DOC PUTS TONGUE IN CHEEK SO FAR THAT IT LOOKS LIKE HE HAS THE MUMPS (again)... ooooooo! OOOOOOO! this is arbitrary as all get-out! and it's even cheaper (if you already own a 2600).... step 1a -on an Arp 2600, hook the reverb output, with nothing connected to the reverb input, to the envelope follower input then the E.F output to a CV-in (ie VCO pitch)...set the E.F. for it's fastest response. or step 1b hook the reverb out to the sample input of the sample/hold and set the S/H trigger rate to the high end, and the S/H output to a CV-in then... step 2 hit the back of the 2600 with your fist, or maybe a rubber mallet! repeatability????? sure! just hit it again! (and make sure you hit it exactly the same way) no fancy computers required at all! ...just limber reverb springs and a little bit of gravity plus, as a byproduct, you'll shake-out any badly seated components in your 2600! ;'> (takes tongue out of cheek) another factor to consider in any comparisons (and comparisons are ALWAYS subjective and controversial) is that , based on his track record, an arbitrary function generator from Wiard is 90% likely to be delivered within the window in which delivery was quoted and it is 99% likely to function per spec when it is delivered. IMHO, makers like Grant & John Blacet don't get enough credit for delivering more modules than excuses. Viva los Wiardos! -doc -- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, "Gary Chang" <gchang@...> wrote: > > Another 'Arbitrary Function Generator' would be the Haken Continuum > Fingerboard with the CVC cv output box. When matched with a typical > MIDI sequencer, the Fingerboard/CVC will accurately record me spilling > my drink on the keypad, and allow me to do the typical MIDI sequencer > ediiting thing (transpose, change speed, store, or discard), then > replay the performance in 16 bit resolution, providing smooth > portamenti over a 7 octave range (or a really smooth pan, or > modulation, depending on the patch. Each CVC box will output 12 > individual cv voltages (and x,y, and z voltage for each of four > voices). Of course, the glutton for exotica that I am, I am planning > on 2 CVC boxes for my Wiard system (8 voices - 24 voltage sources). > > Like the old Subotnick electronic pieces of the 70's, where he snorted > like a 'Wild Beast' into a microphone, recording his 'gestures,' then > transformed them into pulses and control voltages via Buchla Envelope > Detectors, I intend to start accumulating a library of my > drink-spilling events, which I will use for multichannel panning, mood > lighting and other long-term lfo-type functions whose periods are in > the minutes. The more movement, the better.... 8^> > > gary > > > > > "wiardmodular" <wiardmodular@> wrote: > > > > > I have no doubt that the Envelooper is going to be an awesome piece > > of kit and you can sign me up for one now Grant but I have to take > > issue with this comparison. > > > > It seems to me that a 250e on which one can immediately edit the 16 > > steps per channel on is quite a different beast than editing a > > waveform on the pc, burning an PROM, turning off your rig, removing > > an envelooper from its rack to get access to the prom slot, > > replacing the prom, and then powering up the rig again. > > > > Also I'd suggest that the Modcan cv-recorder and a joystick could be > > considered another arbitrary function generator on the market. >
Message
Re: Status of the Envelooper MARF
2007-01-17 by drmabuce
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.