East Coast, West Coast, Middle Coast.... As far as I can see, the caveat about the current state of the art of offering eleventy million modules and having each customer choose is there is no pedigological developement because everyone's instrument is different. Discussions about patches are more like Bob Villas' home improvement show - which is really designed to sell tools. Why develop skill when you simply add a few more modules? I think that this utopian philosophy of providing choices for a customer minus the bias of a system design is like offering people parts to a guitar, expecting the average person or new comer to know what to buy and how to put it together. What made a Buchla, a Moog, a Wavemaker, Electrocomp 100, Korg MS20, or a 2600 isn't what biases the designer pandered to in module design - it was that they were created by people who were trying to design a complete music system - not simply providing a comprehensive catalog of modules. What makes a 2600 or a Music Easel great is not the module-for-module comparisons with other synths - it is the subsystems that exist in these instruments - the patch potential of the factory designed system. The genius was the systems, not the modules. Minimoogs are not just a ladder filter - they are also the choices Bob made on the patch and keyboard retriggering of the filter, and the choices of keyboard tracking, the cv response of the vca... The same idiosyncratic design elements are found all of the classic systems. Modular systems reflected similar biases - Buchlas had quad VCA and Envelope modules, insuring that most Buchla systems had many more of these than found on Moogs and Arps. Why? Because there aren't any LFOs on a Buchla. This doesn't mean that you can't make normal sounds - it means that you have to think differently. (Imagine that). Additional modules were offered as additional complement, but, by and large, many of us spent our first experiences in front of a factory designed system. Can you make West Coast Music on an East Coast synth? Who came up with these terms? Is the music of Columbia Princeton in the 60s any less far out than that of "West Coast?" Many "bug music" pieces have been made on Moog and Arp systems. You might say that Buchlas and Wiards are the Macs in a world dominated by Windows. Most pros have both kinds - discussing which is better is a moot point. How dare any of us to presume the potential of any of these instruments? As if the human playing these devices have no bearing on what we hear - it is predetermined by the circuit design - bullshit! Are they over valued? They are what they are. 7 years ago, I bought a Buchla Music Easel for $8,000. 5 years later, I sold it for $8,000. You might say that I borrowed it for five years, leaving an $8k security deposit, which was returned to me when I passed it on. Gary P.S. The Wiard systems doesn't need more midcoast modules. That is easily provided by a little bit of Midcoast thinking from the one standing before it with the patchcords.
Message
Re: Please support Original Design
2004-06-25 by Gary Chang
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.