I believe that when they did they original sampling, they did a little investigating and came to the conclusion that the bandwidth of the original tape recordings didn't merit a higher sampling rate (i.e there was basically nothing on the mellotron master tapes higher than 11 kHz. To be honest I find this a little hard to believe, but that's what they said...indeed the blurb about it may still be on www.mellotron.com for all the world to read...) --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, john barrick <barrickjohn262@...> wrote: > > It's surprising that it's that low - I worked in television for about 20 > years and we were doing most of our audio at 44 K. > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:23 PM, tron400 <tron400@...> wrote: > > > ** > > > > > > But does batch-converting 16 bit to 24 bit improve the sound? I would think > > that resampling would be necessary. Also the Pinder samples were sampled at > > 22,050 Hz. There's lots of room for improvement there. > > > > Bernie > > > > -- > john barrick > > *Leo got it right the first time* > *then he added a second pickup and got it righter* >
Message
Re: M4000 D
2011-09-03 by feline1973
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.