The Mellotron Group

I won't. It's the best of the lot. I'd love to have one just to have. It's  
not a Mellotron, but it has cool sounds in it, and lots of them. It has  
Mellotron sounds and Chamberlin sounds. It had friendly software  and it does 
cool stuff. It isn't a Mellotron but it does as good an imitation of  one as 
you're likely to find anywhere.
 
If you have both you're all the better for it. I was thinking of buying one 
 and sometime soon I might. I am fortunate because I have a real M4000 
Mellotron  and I love playing it and having others play and record it. I also 
have  acquired a real Chamberlin M1.
 
Frank
 
 
In a message dated 9/1/2011 12:13:33 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
gabru@comsec.net writes:

 
 
 
 
In a live or  studio mix you would never hear the difference especially 
after the reverb and   
other  processing that is commonly used on Mellotron tracks.  It will 
almost  certainly out  
sell the tape  machines but most on this list will hate it no matter what 
it sounds  like.   
Fire away….  J 
 
 
From:  newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com]  On Behalf Of mellotronmadness
Sent: Wednesday, August 31,  2011 8:56 PM
To:  newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [newmellotrongroup] M4000  D

 
 
 
 
I hadn't seen this before, I think I can just tell the  difference between 
the M4000D and the Mark VI. I don't suppose anybody on the  list has been 
tempted?
 

 

 
_http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYKe7a7lc-E&feature=related_ 
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYKe7a7lc-E&feature=related) <  /div>  
 

 
Mark