The Mellotron Group group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

The Mellotron Group

Index last updated: 2026-03-31 23:34 UTC

Thread

How 6 track tapes work!

How 6 track tapes work!

2009-04-12 by tronbros@aol.com

How 6 track tapes work!

The idea behind 6 track tapes is to provide 5 unique blends. Here’s how……………………..

You have the possibility of positioning your headblock in 5 positions:

A / A+B / B / B+C / C.

When you choose your 6 tracks, say Flute/Violins/Brass/String Section/Eight Choir/Church Organ, they will be allocated as follows:

A = Flute / Violins

A+B = Violins / Brass

B = Brass / SS

B+C = SS / Eight

C = Eight / Church Org.

You can create 5 unique blends depending on how wild you want to make your choices.

By necessity, these tapes will be tuned up to avoid hazardous clashings of pitch which exists to some extent in all Mellotron recordings.

Streetly Electronics - All Things Mellotronic
www.mellotronics.com
US Sales East: Jimmy Moore JMoore6397@aol.com
US Sales West: Paul Cox pjc56@earthlink

Re: How 6 track tapes work!

2009-04-12 by ceccles_ca

Thanks for explaining this. It's like I tell my know it all wife:
" You think you know everything, but you don't know shit ! "

Sorry about that. I'll shut up now.

Clay

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Birotron on ebay

2009-04-13 by Huff Talbot

Road trip to Italy anyone?

--- On Mon, 4/13/09, Mark Wallis <markstuartwallis@hotmail.com> wrote:
From: Mark Wallis <markstuartwallis@hotmail.com>
Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Birotron on ebay
To: "new trongroup" <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Monday, April 13, 2009, 12:31 AM


Dig this:


ebay item no 290309681450



Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Give Back
Yahoo! for Good

Get inspired

by a good cause.

Y! Toolbar
Get it Free!

easy 1-click access

to your groups.

Yahoo! Groups
Start a group

in 3 easy steps.

Connect with others.

.


" Upgrade to Internet Explorer 8 Optimised for MSN. " Download Now

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Birotron on ebay

2009-04-13 by NormLeete@aol.com

In a message dated 13/04/2009 10:27:30 GMT Standard Time, tronbros@aol.com writes:
It's the one we restored about 7 years ago!
I remember it. The noisiest thing I've ever seen, not electrically but mechanically as all those 8 track cartridges whirred there little hearts out. That was the new ones!
Norm

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Birotron on ebay

2009-04-13 by Mike Dickson

Played it, hated it.

The keyboard is heavier than a direct action pipe organ, thanks to the
keys being sprung with something that could have been used to catapult
boulders over a castle wall 600 years ago. Worse than that is the noise
from the mechanics of the machine. Dear god...all those little 8 track
cartridges clattering away constantly. I never thought much of the
fidelity either, although that may have had something to do with the
state of the recordings.

Even worse though is that it all works on tape loops, thereby losing
that characteristic attack that actually signals what a sound is.Without
it (say) a solo cello and a solo voice sound amazingly similar, although
with the reproduction problems the Birotron had it's amazing it sounded
like anything at all. It's better than the Orchestron (which seems to
have a library of sine waves, clicks and white noise) but not by much.


tronbros@aol.com wrote:
>
>
> It's the one we restored about 7 years ago!
>
> M
>
> *Streetly Electronics - All Things Mellotronic
> www.mellotronics.com <http://www.mellotronics.com/>*
> US Sales East: Jimmy Moore JMoore6397@aol.com <http://JMoore6397@aol.com/>
> US Sales West: Paul Cox pjc56@earthlink <mailto:pjc56@earthlink>
>
>

--
Mike Dickson, Edinburgh

Free Music Project: http://www.last.fm/music/Mike+Dickson
Or http://www.mikedickson.org.uk/

Re: How 6 track tapes work!

2009-04-13 by lilainjil

Okay, thanks for the clarification.

I'm going to have to think very hard about this. The variety of tones is potentially very cool. Though at the expense of any solo instrument.

Especially tricky as there is no way to audition any possible combinations before ordering. You have to imagine it.

Back to my short list of sounds...

Andy

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, tronbros@... wrote:
>
>
> How 6 track tapes work!
> The idea behind 6 track tapes is to provide 5 unique blends. Here’s how
> ……………………..
> You have the possibility of positioning your headblock in 5 positions:
> A / A+B / B / B+C / C.
> When you choose your 6 tracks, say Flute/Violins/Brass/String Section/Eight
> Choir/Church Organ, they will be allocated as follows:
> A = Flute / Violins
> A+B = Violins / Brass
> B = Brass / SS
> B+C = SS / Eight
> C = Eight / Church Org.
> You can create 5 unique blends depending on how wild you want to make your
> choices.
> By necessity, these tapes will be tuned up to avoid hazardous clashings of
> pitch which exists to some extent in all Mellotron recordings.
>
>
> Streetly Electronics - All Things Mellotronic
> _www.mellotronics.com_ (http://www.mellotronics.com/)
>
> US Sales East: Jimmy Moore_ JMoore6397@..._
> (http://JMoore6397@.../)
> US Sales West: Paul Cox_ pjc56@earthlink_ (mailto:pjc56@earthlink)
>

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Birotron on ebay

2009-04-13 by will davis

Mike....I have played a pipe organ and I have played a Birotron and I can safely say that you obviously never actually played a Birotron.....why are you lying about it ? The key action was lightning fast; it was made by Pratt and Reade, the same company that made keyboards for Moog and many others. If you did indeed play one and maybe you are just prejudiced for some reason, Id be curious to know exactly when, where and who owned it ! dave
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 5:42 AM
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Birotron on ebay

Played it, hated it.

The keyboard is heavier than a direct action pipe organ, thanks to the
keys being sprung with something that could have been used to catapult
boulders over a castle wall 600 years ago. Worse than that is the noise
from the mechanics of the machine. Dear god...all those little 8 track
cartridges clattering away constantly. I never thought much of the
fidelity either, although that may have had something to do with the
state of the recordings.

Even worse though is that it all works on tape loops, thereby losing
that characteristic attack that actually signals what a sound is.Without
it (say) a solo cello and a solo voice sound amazingly similar, although
with the reproduction problems the Birotron had it's amazing it sounded
like anything at all. It's better than the Orchestron (which seems to
have a library of sine waves, clicks and white noise) but not by much.

tronbros@aol. com wrote:
>
>
> It's the one we restored about 7 years ago!
>
> M
>
> *Streetly Electronics - All Things Mellotronic
> www.mellotronics. com <http://www.mellotro nics.com/>*
> US Sales East: Jimmy Moore JMoore6397@aol. com <http://JMoore6397@ aol.com/>
> US Sales West: Paul Cox pjc56@earthlink <mailto:pjc56@ earthlink>
>
>

--
Mike Dickson, Edinburgh

Free Music Project: http://www.last. fm/music/ Mike+Dickson
Or http://www.mikedick son.org.uk/

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Birotron on ebay

2009-04-13 by Mike Dickson

Dave -

You're quite right. It was all a figment of my imagination. Playing a
Birotron was the highlight of my entire life and was an experience so
intense I'd happily give up food and oxygen for a week just to re-live.
Indeed, I'd happily crawl for 100 miles over broken glass just to wank
over the shadow of a Birotron, dreaming of its lightning fast Pratt and
Reade keyboard action. I will further add that all the clattering from
the arse end of the Birotron doesn't happen and that in fact the
mechanism is so silent it stilled the myriad chattering voices in my
head that made me think I was playing the thing when it's obvious that I
was not.

Thanks for clearing all this up.

Mike

will davis wrote:
>
>
> Mike....I have played a pipe organ and I have played a Birotron and I
> can safely say that you obviously never actually played a
> Birotron.....why are you lying about it ? The key action was
> lightning fast; it was made by Pratt and Reade, the same company that
> made keyboards for Moog and many others. If you did indeed play one
> and maybe you are just prejudiced for some reason, Id be curious to
> know exactly when, where and who owned it ! dave
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Mike Dickson <mailto:mike.dickson@gmail.com>
> *To:* newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, April 13, 2009 5:42 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [newmellotrongroup] Birotron on ebay
>
> Played it, hated it.
>
> The keyboard is heavier than a direct action pipe organ, thanks to
> the
> keys being sprung with something that could have been used to
> catapult
> boulders over a castle wall 600 years ago. Worse than that is the
> noise
> from the mechanics of the machine. Dear god...all those little 8
> track
> cartridges clattering away constantly. I never thought much of the
> fidelity either, although that may have had something to do with the
> state of the recordings.
>
> Even worse though is that it all works on tape loops, thereby losing
> that characteristic attack that actually signals what a sound
> is.Without
> it (say) a solo cello and a solo voice sound amazingly similar,
> although
> with the reproduction problems the Birotron had it's amazing it
> sounded
> like anything at all. It's better than the Orchestron (which seems to
> have a library of sine waves, clicks and white noise) but not by much.
>
> tronbros@aol.com <mailto:tronbros%40aol.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > It's the one we restored about 7 years ago!
> >
> > M
> >
> > *Streetly Electronics - All Things Mellotronic
> > www.mellotronics.com <http://www.mellotronics.com/
> <http://www.mellotronics.com/>>*
> > US Sales East: Jimmy Moore JMoore6397@aol.com
> <mailto:JMoore6397%40aol.com> <http://JMoore6397@aol.com/
> <http://JMoore6397@aol.com/>>
> > US Sales West: Paul Cox pjc56@earthlink <mailto:pjc56@earthlink>
> >
> >
>
> --
> Mike Dickson, Edinburgh
>
> Free Music Project: http://www.last.fm/music/Mike+Dickson
> <http://www.last.fm/music/Mike+Dickson>
> Or http://www.mikedickson.org.uk/ <http://www.mikedickson.org.uk/>
>
>

--
Mike Dickson, Edinburgh

Free Music Project: http://www.last.fm/music/Mike+Dickson
Or http://www.mikedickson.org.uk/

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Birotron on ebay

2009-04-14 by lsf5275@aol.com

Mike, you're avoiding the questions. When and where did you play one, and who did it belong to. Your first email was pointed and filled with opinions. Fair enough. But in his rebuttal, Dave asked fair questions. Your retort was silly. Support the reasons for your opinion. I think that's reasonable. There isn't one credible word in the statement below.
Frank
In a message dated 4/13/2009 8:47:05 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, mike.dickson@gmail.com writes:
Dave -

You're quite right. It was all a figment of my imagination. Playing a
Birotron was the highlight of my entire life and was an experience so
intense I'd happily give up food and oxygen for a week just to re-live.
Indeed, I'd happily crawl for 100 miles over broken glass just to wank
over the shadow of a Birotron, dreaming of its lightning fast Pratt and
Reade keyboard action. I will further add that all the clattering from
the arse end of the Birotron doesn't happen and that in fact the
mechanism is so silent it stilled the myriad chattering voices in my
head that made me think I was playing the thing when it's obvious that I
was not.

Thanks for clearing all this up.

Why pay full price? Check out this month's deals on the new AOL Shopping.

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Birotron on ebay

2009-04-14 by Rick Blechta


On Apr 13, 2009, at 9:30 PM, lsf5275@aol.com wrote:

Mike, you're avoiding the questions. When and where did you play one, and who did it belong to. Your first email was pointed and filled with opinions. Fair enough. But in his rebuttal, Dave asked fair questions. Your retort was silly. Support the reasons for your opinion. I think that's reasonable. There isn't one credible word in the statement below.
Frank

No, Frank. Dave's response was rude. He called Mike a liar, did he not? I don't think you'd be too happy if someone you didn't know called you a liar. If Dave wanted questions answered, he should have asked them in a civilized manner. It's lucky that Mike is just so damn nice about these kinds of things.

Or not.

Rick

RE: [newmellotrongroup] Birotron on ebay

2009-04-14 by Pomeroy Ranch

On Apr 13, 2009, at 9:30 PM, lsf5275@aol. com wrote:



Mike, you're avoiding the questions. When and where did you play one, and who did it belong to. Your first email was pointed and filled with opinions. Fair enough. But in his rebuttal, Dave asked fair questions. Your retort was silly. Support the reasons for your opinion. I think that's reasonable. There isn't one credible word in the statement below.

Frank

No, Frank. Dave's response was rude. He called Mike a liar, did he not? I don't think you'd be too happy if someone you didn't know called you a liar. If Dave wanted questions answered, he should have asked them in a civilized manner. It's lucky that Mike is just so damn nice about these kinds of things.

Or not.

Rick

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Birotron on ebay

2009-04-14 by lsf5275@aol.com

I guess I missed that. But at the same time, even though I imagine that the Birotron was a piece of shit, I would like a little substance. I'm not looking for an argument or to create ill will.
Frank
In a message dated 4/13/2009 9:38:12 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, rick@rickblechta.com writes:
No, Frank. Dave's response was rude. He called Mike a liar, did he not? I don't think you'd be too happy if someone you didn't know called you a liar. If Dave wanted questions answered, he should have asked them in a civilized manner. It's lucky that Mike is just so damn nice about these kinds of things.

Why pay full price? Check out this month's deals on the new AOL Shopping.

RE: [newmellotrongroup] Birotron on ebay

2009-04-14 by Nic Lewis

I have just read the recent exchanges regarding Birotrons.

Some years ago I ventured onto this list because I was employed
building the Birotrons in the mid seventies. I thought at the time I
joined the list that the members may be interested in this slightly
off topic diversion and indeed I was welcomed wholeheartedly by some
members of the list, but berated quite rudely by others. My only
crime: to have worked for Wakeman making these things and quoting the
rationale behind the design *as seen at the time*. I was a little
disappointed, but as this is a list that is primarily about another
machine I understood why some would hold those attitudes. I make no
judgement about this. It is what it is.

Now this debate has been re-ignited I feel I must make some comments
based on actual experience and knowledge. I have no intention of
commenting on the discussion as to the politeness or otherwise in the
recent list exchanges, and I would not rush to make value judgements
about things which have an amount of subjective value.

In response to specifics, I would also be very interested to know
which Birotron Mike played, if I know this I may well be able to shed
some light on it's history which may assist in understanding Mike's opinions.

I did not experience anyone at the time of construction criticising
the action of the keyboard. I am not including those obvious
supporters such as Wakeman (naturally) or any Birotronics staff, but
a number of musicians passing through. Now this was a long time ago
and these may not have been high calibre artists but nonetheless that
is how it was. I have, however, seen criticism elsewhere more
recently. I cannot lay my hands on it right now and cannot speak for
it's veracity, which is why it would be interesting to explore Mike's
experiences in more detail.

The noise of the tapes and the question of fidelity where largely an
attribute of the way an engineer working for Wakeman decided to
reduce the size of the instrument, the original having discrete
players housed in the cabinet base. It was decided to put them
vertically in the back of the machine with a common drive. It was
some time before a new engineer checked the specification of 8 track
cartridges and it was discovered that playing them vertically is not
recommended. The inventor, Dave Biro, was not involved in this design
change and should not be held responsible for the inadequacies
pertaining. That being said, when properly set up and with the tape
sets recorded specially for the machine, the fidelity would be good.
Again, it would be interesting to know the details of the machine
Mike played, and when - that may help in ascertaining as to whether
it was in a good condition when played.

Frank has a disinterest in the machine and I'm sorry if my posting is
boring for him or others who share that valid viewpoint. I would
however question the comment regarding the failure of the Birotron.
There where a number of reasons for its failure, and they where not
limited to the quality of the machine, indeed this was not a major
issue at the time. I will not tire the audience with the whole sad
affair here but I can say that at the time there ware pledges and
pre-orders for hundreds of machines. I, and the rest of the small
team working on it, where quite surprised when work was halted
and it was many years before my interest re-emerged.

With regard to the number built, I can say with a high degree of
confidence that with the exception of Dave Biro's own prototypes
there where 15 built, two of which where further prototypes. Of the
13 remaining the whereabouts of 5 is known. One is in my possession
and being restored, a second is with a friend of mine who is also an
ex-Birotrionics employee and is almost fully restored. A third is the
one being sold on ebay. I know the history of these machines and the
remaining 2. 1 further machine is known to have been scrapped and
parts used to restore the 2 mentioned previously, it unlikely that
any others exist.

I hope this helps to put things into perspective. I have tried to be
as objective as possible and should anyone wish to discuss further
you may. of course, email me off list.


Regards,

Nic Lewis

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Birotron on ebay

2009-04-14 by Tom Doncourt

Now, THAT’S interesting.. As for the action. I had a fender rhodes that had horrible action but I don’t judge the keyboard as a whole by it.
My hats off to any one who can engineer a thing like the Birotron, to take a weird idea like that to it’s completion. My respect to you.
As Indiana Jones would say “it belongs in a Museum”.




I have just read the recent exchanges regarding Birotrons.

Some years ago I ventured onto this list because I was employed
building the Birotrons in the mid seventies. I thought at the time I
joined the list that the members may be interested in this slightly
off topic diversion and indeed I was welcomed wholeheartedly by some
members of the list, but berated quite rudely by others. My only
crime: to have worked for Wakeman making these things and quoting the
rationale behind the design *as seen at the time*. I was a little
disappointed, but as this is a list that is primarily about another
machine I understood why some would hold those attitudes. I make no
judgement about this. It is what it is.

Now this debate has been re-ignited I feel I must make some comments
based on actual experience and knowledge. I have no intention of
commenting on the discussion as to the politeness or otherwise in the
recent list exchanges, and I would not rush to make value judgements
about things which have an amount of subjective value.

In response to specifics, I would also be very interested to know
which Birotron Mike played, if I know this I may well be able to shed
some light on it's history which may assist in understanding Mike's opinions.

I did not experience anyone at the time of construction criticising
the action of the keyboard. I am not including those obvious
supporters such as Wakeman (naturally) or any Birotronics staff, but
a number of musicians passing through. Now this was a long time ago
and these may not have been high calibre artists but nonetheless that
is how it was. I have, however, seen criticism elsewhere more
recently. I cannot lay my hands on it right now and cannot speak for
it's veracity, which is why it would be interesting to explore Mike's
experiences in more detail.

The noise of the tapes and the question of fidelity where largely an
attribute of the way an engineer working for Wakeman decided to
reduce the size of the instrument, the original having discrete
players housed in the cabinet base. It was decided to put them
vertically in the back of the machine with a common drive. It was
some time before a new engineer checked the specification of 8 track
cartridges and it was discovered that playing them vertically is not
recommended. The inventor, Dave Biro, was not involved in this design
change and should not be held responsible for the inadequacies
pertaining. That being said, when properly set up and with the tape
sets recorded specially for the machine, the fidelity would be good.
Again, it would be interesting to know the details of the machine
Mike played, and when - that may help in ascertaining as to whether
it was in a good condition when played.

Frank has a disinterest in the machine and I'm sorry if my posting is
boring for him or others who share that valid viewpoint. I would
however question the comment regarding the failure of the Birotron.
There where a number of reasons for its failure, and they where not
limited to the quality of the machine, indeed this was not a major
issue at the time. I will not tire the audience with the whole sad
affair here but I can say that at the time there ware pledges and
pre-orders for hundreds of machines. I, and the rest of the small
team working on it, where quite surprised when work was halted
and it was many years before my interest re-emerged.

With regard to the number built, I can say with a high degree of
confidence that with the exception of Dave Biro's own prototypes
there where 15 built, two of which where further prototypes. Of the
13 remaining the whereabouts of 5 is known. One is in my possession
and being restored, a second is with a friend of mine who is also an
ex-Birotrionics employee and is almost fully restored. A third is the
one being sold on ebay. I know the history of these machines and the
remaining 2. 1 further machine is known to have been scrapped and
parts used to restore the 2 mentioned previously, it unlikely that
any others exist.

I hope this helps to put things into perspective. I have tried to be
as objective as possible and should anyone wish to discuss further
you may. of course, email me off list.

Regards,

Nic Lewis






Re: [newmellotrongroup] Birotron on ebay

2009-04-14 by lsf5275@aol.com

Nic,
I think I have a photo of a pile of Birotrons that you sent me years back. I believe there were three in the photo. Two restorable and one parts machine. I wondered whatever happened. Thanks for the post.
No hard feelings, I hope. By the way, Chris Dale has one of Dave's prototypes with the horizontal cassette arrangement you described. He is currently restoring it. As for the rest of them, the production machines, though well engineered, were flawed. They went the way of the Optigan and the Orchestron.
Mellotrons survived because the concept worked and enough were produced and used to mark their place in history, and like neckties, the have come back into vogue. (although the do sound better than neckties)
Frank
In a message dated 4/14/2009 5:14:51 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, nic@thepub.org.uk writes:
I hope this helps to put things into perspective. I have tried to be
as objective as possible and should anyone wish to discuss further
you may. of course, email me off list.

Regards,

Nic Lewis

Why pay full price? Check out this month's deals on the new AOL Shopping.

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Birotron on ebay

2009-04-15 by jeffrey coulter

mr dickson, now you should use some sort of secretly coded insult to our list moderator or some other such thing to get yourself booted from the group - we can all relive the childish drama that killed the last list!

i kid of course.

you were specifically and deliberately called a liar without instigation, other than stating your opinion, one which many here know that, while snarky at times [in a good and humourous way IMHO], is at the very least well informed.


jeez.
i go away for a couple days and all hell breaks loose.

peace boys and girls.
please?

...jeff


--- On Mon, 4/13/09, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Birotron on ebay
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Monday, April 13, 2009, 7:25 PM
> Dave -
>
> You're quite right. It was all a figment of my
> imagination. Playing a
> Birotron was the highlight of my entire life and was an
> experience so
> intense I'd happily give up food and oxygen for a week
> just to re-live.
> Indeed, I'd happily crawl for 100 miles over broken
> glass just to wank
> over the shadow of a Birotron, dreaming of its lightning
> fast Pratt and
> Reade keyboard action. I will further add that all the
> clattering from
> the arse end of the Birotron doesn't happen and that in
> fact the
> mechanism is so silent it stilled the myriad chattering
> voices in my
> head that made me think I was playing the thing when
> it's obvious that I
> was not.
>
> Thanks for clearing all this up.
>
> Mike
>
> will davis wrote:
> >
> >
> > Mike....I have played a pipe organ and I have played a
> Birotron and I
> > can safely say that you obviously never actually
> played a
> > Birotron.....why are you lying about it ? The key
> action was
> > lightning fast; it was made by Pratt and Reade, the
> same company that
> > made keyboards for Moog and many others. If you did
> indeed play one
> > and maybe you are just prejudiced for some reason, Id
> be curious to
> > know exactly when, where and who owned it ! dave
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > *From:* Mike Dickson
> <mailto:mike.dickson@gmail.com>
> > *To:* newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> > <mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com>
> > *Sent:* Monday, April 13, 2009 5:42 AM
> > *Subject:* Re: [newmellotrongroup] Birotron on
> ebay
> >
> > Played it, hated it.
> >
> > The keyboard is heavier than a direct action pipe
> organ, thanks to
> > the
> > keys being sprung with something that could have
> been used to
> > catapult
> > boulders over a castle wall 600 years ago. Worse
> than that is the
> > noise
> > from the mechanics of the machine. Dear god...all
> those little 8
> > track
> > cartridges clattering away constantly. I never
> thought much of the
> > fidelity either, although that may have had
> something to do with the
> > state of the recordings.
> >
> > Even worse though is that it all works on tape
> loops, thereby losing
> > that characteristic attack that actually signals
> what a sound
> > is.Without
> > it (say) a solo cello and a solo voice sound
> amazingly similar,
> > although
> > with the reproduction problems the Birotron had
> it's amazing it
> > sounded
> > like anything at all. It's better than the
> Orchestron (which seems to
> > have a library of sine waves, clicks and white
> noise) but not by much.
> >
> > tronbros@aol.com <mailto:tronbros%40aol.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > It's the one we restored about 7 years
> ago!
> > >
> > > M
> > >
> > > *Streetly Electronics - All Things
> Mellotronic
> > > www.mellotronics.com
> <http://www.mellotronics.com/
> > <http://www.mellotronics.com/>>*
> > > US Sales East: Jimmy Moore JMoore6397@aol.com
> > <mailto:JMoore6397%40aol.com>
> <http://JMoore6397@aol.com/
> > <http://JMoore6397@aol.com/>>
> > > US Sales West: Paul Cox pjc56@earthlink
> <mailto:pjc56@earthlink>
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Mike Dickson, Edinburgh
> >
> > Free Music Project:
> http://www.last.fm/music/Mike+Dickson
> > <http://www.last.fm/music/Mike+Dickson>
> > Or http://www.mikedickson.org.uk/
> <http://www.mikedickson.org.uk/>
> >
> >
>
> --
> Mike Dickson, Edinburgh
>
> Free Music Project: http://www.last.fm/music/Mike+Dickson
> Or http://www.mikedickson.org.uk/
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

Re: Birotron on ebay

2009-04-15 by James Bailey

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, lsf5275@... wrote:
>
> Mellotrons survived because the concept worked and enough were produced and
> used to mark their place in history, and like neckties, the have come back
> into vogue. (although the do sound better than neckties)

That depends on who's being strangled by it - uh, the necktie.

Jim Bailey