The Mellotron Group group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

The Mellotron Group

Archive for newmellotrongroup.v1.

Index last updated: 2026-03-30 01:16 UTC

Thread

Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-18 by Mike Dickson

Someone local to me is selling a minimoog.  I admit I am tempted.  He doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary about.  Yes, we're quite a team.

What are they generally being sold for these days?
What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)

Mike

RE: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-18 by Gary Brumm

Mike,

 

You might want to check eBay under sold items to see if you can get an idea of what they are currently going for. 

The asking price really means nothing…you have to see what they actually sell for.  The same goes for those “boutique”

gear dealers as they ask astronomical prices that do not reflect the real world value.  Also the age of the capacitors is

such that if it hasn’t been rebuilt it will likely be undependable if even operable.  As far as service goes I used to work

on them and would be happy to give you any information I can but it might be a little far for a service call!  The last I

checked a Minimoog in good shape was running around $1800 USD but that was a while ago.  Actually in this economy

you might actually be able to get a better deal these days. 

 

Gary

 

 

From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mike Dickson
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2012 8:50 PM
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

 

 

Someone local to me is selling a minimoog.  I admit I am tempted.  He doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary about.  Yes, we're quite a team.

 

What are they generally being sold for these days?

What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)

 

Mike

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-18 by Kinchmusic

If you decide against it Mike I might be interested, even if it needs work.

Andy

Andy Kinch


On 18 Nov 2012, at 04:50, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@gmail.com> wrote:

 

Someone local to me is selling a minimoog.  I admit I am tempted.  He doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary about.  Yes, we're quite a team.


What are they generally being sold for these days?
What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)

Mike

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-18 by Chris Dale

Mike,

Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending on some variables.


The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this matters a lot to you.

When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990)  people were paying more for the ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I believe).

Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the name mini-moog).

In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.

But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and (some say better) sound.

Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off from the electronics.
Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it to make it look more contemporary.)  What they really did was just damage everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the electronics.

The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues back when I got mine.

I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.

But it is something to be aware of.


You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or new oscillator cards.

There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.

The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave /pitch tuning.
On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.

Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple parts and electronics.  In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.

It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an informed decision before agreeing to a price.


Chris





On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@gmail.com> wrote:
 

Someone local to me is selling a minimoog.  I admit I am tempted.  He doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary about.  Yes, we're quite a team.


What are they generally being sold for these days?
What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)

Mike


Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-18 by Paul Marshall

Hi Mike,
 
 
Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am in the UK like yourself.
 
Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up metal box).
 
I've had 2 issues since then
(1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4 diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
 
(2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I am used to using professionally - sorted.
 
Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which should be around for some time to come.
 
And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape :-o  ?
 
cheers Paul M.
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Chris Dale
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

 


Mike,

Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending on some variables.


The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this matters a lot to you.

When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990)  people were paying more for the ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I believe).

Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the name mini-moog).

In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.

But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and (some say better) sound.

Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off from the electronics.
Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it to make it look more contemporary.)  What they really did was just damage everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the electronics.

The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues back when I got mine.

I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.

But it is something to be aware of.


You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or new oscillator cards.

There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.

The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave /pitch tuning.
On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.

Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple parts and electronics.  In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.

It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an informed decision before agreeing to a price.


Chris





On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@gmail.com> wrote:
 

Someone local to me is selling a minimoog.  I admit I am tempted.  He doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary about.  Yes, we're quite a team.


What are they generally being sold for these days?
What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)

Mike




__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7703 (20121117) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7703 (20121117) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-18 by ClayE

Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one. http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something... The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.

For an instant erection, check out the white ones!

Clay


--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Marshall" <paulm@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
>
> Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am in the UK like yourself.
>
> Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up metal box).
>
> I've had 2 issues since then
> (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4 diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
>
> (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I am used to using professionally - sorted.
>
> Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which should be around for some time to come.
>
> And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape :-o ?
>
> cheers Paul M.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Chris Dale
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
>
>
>
>
> Mike,
>
> Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending on some variables.
>
>
> The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this matters a lot to you.
>
> When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I believe).
>
> Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the name mini-moog).
>
> In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
>
> But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and (some say better) sound.
>
> Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off from the electronics.
> Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the electronics.
>
> The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues back when I got mine.
>
> I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
>
> But it is something to be aware of.
>
>
> You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or new oscillator cards.
>
> There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
>
> The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave /pitch tuning.
> On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
>
> Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
>
> It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an informed decision before agreeing to a price.
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@...> wrote:
>
>
> Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary about. Yes, we're quite a team.
>
>
>
> What are they generally being sold for these days?
> What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
>
>
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-18 by Andy Kinch

And can be bought for half the price!

Andy Kinch
kinchmusic@aol.com


-----Original Message-----
From: ClayE <ecclesreinson@rogers.com>
To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

 
Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one. http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something... The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.

For an instant erection, check out the white ones!

Clay

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Marshall" <paulm@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
>
> Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am in the UK like yourself.
>
> Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up metal box).
>
> I've had 2 issues since then
> (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4 diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
>
> (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I am used to using professionally - sorted.
>
> Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which should be around for some time to come.
>
> And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape :-o ?
>
> cheers Paul M.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Chris Dale
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
>
>
>
>
> Mike,
>
> Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending on some variables.
>
>
> The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this matters a lot to you.
>
> When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I believe).
>
> Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the name mini-moog).
>
> In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
>
> But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and (some say better) sound.
>
> Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off from the electronics.
> Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the electronics.
>
> The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues back when I got mine.
>
> I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
>
> But it is something to be aware of.
>
>
> You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or new oscillator cards.
>
> There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
>
> The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave /pitch tuning.
> On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
>
> Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
>
> It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an informed decision before agreeing to a price.
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@...> wrote:
>
>
> Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary about. Yes, we're quite a team.
>
>
>
> What are they generally being sold for these days?
> What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
>
>
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-18 by gino wong

Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
£ 1250  is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according to quality. If well kept a lot more.

On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch <kinchmusic@aol.com> wrote:
 

And can be bought for half the price!

Andy Kinch
kinchmusic@aol.com


-----Original Message-----
From: ClayE <ecclesreinson@rogers.com>
To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

 
Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one. http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something... The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.

For an instant erection, check out the white ones!

Clay

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Marshall" <paulm@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
>
> Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am in the UK like yourself.
>
> Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up metal box).
>
> I've had 2 issues since then
> (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4 diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
>
> (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I am used to using professionally - sorted.
>
> Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which should be around for some time to come.
>
> And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape :-o ?
>
> cheers Paul M.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Chris Dale
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
>
>
>
>
> Mike,
>
> Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending on some variables.
>
>
> The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this matters a lot to you.
>
> When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I believe).
>
> Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the name mini-moog).
>
> In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
>
> But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and (some say better) sound.
>
> Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off from the electronics.
> Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the electronics.
>
> The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues back when I got mine.
>
> I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
>
> But it is something to be aware of.
>
>
> You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or new oscillator cards.
>
> There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
>
> The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave /pitch tuning.
> On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
>
> Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
>
> It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an informed decision before agreeing to a price.
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@...> wrote:
>
>
> Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary about. Yes, we're quite a team.
>
>
>
> What are they generally being sold for these days?
> What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
>
>
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>




--

Gino Wong Birgelo
BSComm, BSEE,
ReRED Recording, Analog Sound Design
Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics




Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-18 by ClayE

The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog Voyager Old School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little Phatty slim is $849.00. All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod and pitch wheels. If you don't already have a good controller keyboard, the Little Phatty stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.

Clay


--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, gino wong <wonggster@...> wrote:
>
> Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> £ 1250 is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according
> to quality. If well kept a lot more.
>
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch <kinchmusic@...> wrote:
>
> > **
> >
> >
> > **And can be bought for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> >
> > Andy Kinch
> > kinchmusic@...
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ClayE <ecclesreinson@...>
> > To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> >
> >
> > Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many
> > good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one.
> > http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think
> > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...
> > The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the
> > Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> >
> > For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> >
> > Clay
> >
> > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Marshall" <paulm@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Mike,
> > >
> > >
> > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am
> > in the UK like yourself.
> > >
> > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is
> > on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up
> > metal box).
> > >
> > > I've had 2 issues since then
> > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I
> > think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have
> > replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
> > diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > >
> > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which
> > connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean
> > them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I
> > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > >
> > > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound
> > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which
> > should be around for some time to come.
> > >
> > > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape
> > :-o ?
> > >
> > > cheers Paul M.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Chris Dale
> > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Mike,
> > >
> > > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in
> > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending
> > on some variables.
> > >
> > >
> > > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this
> > matters a lot to you.
> > >
> > > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the
> > ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I
> > believe).
> > >
> > > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the
> > name mini-moog).
> > >
> > > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the
> > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > >
> > > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
> > oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and
> > (some say better) sound.
> > >
> > > Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off
> > from the electronics.
> > > Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard
> > and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it
> > to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage
> > everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
> > electronics.
> > >
> > > The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues
> > back when I got mine.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > >
> > > But it is something to be aware of.
> > >
> > >
> > > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or
> > new oscillator cards.
> > >
> > > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> > Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > >
> > > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
> > /pitch tuning.
> > > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> > >
> > > Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple
> > parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a
> > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > >
> > > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an
> > informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > >
> > >
> > > Chris
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
> > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary
> > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are
> > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot
> > even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Mike
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > >
> > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > >
> > > http://www.eset.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > >
> > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > >
> > > http://www.eset.com
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *
> *
> *Gino Wong Birgelo*
> BSComm, BSEE,
> ReRED Recording, *Analog Sound Design*
> *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics*
>
> *Ginowong@...*
> *
> *
>

Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-18 by markpringnz

I was a bit disappointed with the Slim Phatty, it is probably my ears but it didn't sound amazingly different to any other synthesizer and seemed pretty expensive for a monophonic synthesizer. I quite liked the DSI mopho keyboard which also has a great layout. In the end I decided to stick with my Microkorg and VSTs. The Arturia Moog sounds pretty good. One electromechanical nightmare is enough for me!

Mark

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, "ClayE" <ecclesreinson@...> wrote:
>
> Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one. http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something... The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
>
> For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
>
> Clay
>
>
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Marshall" <paulm@> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> >
> > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am in the UK like yourself.
> >
> > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up metal box).
> >
> > I've had 2 issues since then
> > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4 diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> >
> > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I am used to using professionally - sorted.
> >
> > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which should be around for some time to come.
> >
> > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape :-o ?
> >
> > cheers Paul M.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Chris Dale
> > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Mike,
> >
> > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending on some variables.
> >
> >
> > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this matters a lot to you.
> >
> > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I believe).
> >
> > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the name mini-moog).
> >
> > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> >
> > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and (some say better) sound.
> >
> > Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off from the electronics.
> > Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the electronics.
> >
> > The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues back when I got mine.
> >
> > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> >
> > But it is something to be aware of.
> >
> >
> > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or new oscillator cards.
> >
> > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> >
> > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave /pitch tuning.
> > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> >
> > Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> >
> > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> >
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> >
> >
> >
> > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> >
> >
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> >
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> >
> > http://www.eset.com
> >
> >
> >
> > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> >
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> >
> > http://www.eset.com
> >
>

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-18 by Andy Thompson

 
 
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:50 AM
Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
 

 
Mike
 
If you go for it (I recommend, FWIW), I’ve got a good tech guy down south (Bedford). Our Mark Wallis is another Man Who Knows.
 
Andy T.
 

Someone local to me is selling a minimoog.  I admit I am tempted.  He doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary about.  Yes, we're quite a team.
 
What are they generally being sold for these days?
What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
 
Mike

RE: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-18 by John Hammaren

In a general sense, your point is correct (about those keys being overpriced) for 95% of the user population. And the same thing can be said for everything from automobiles to Mellotrons. I have not played the Phatty and have no interest, since I have a Voyager Signature. I do know that no amount to patching on my Dotcom will ever produce the fat sound one can get from the Voyager. Close, but not the same. And Minimoog (classic) aficionados will argue the Voyagers don’t match a finely maintained Minimoog. If I didn’t own a Mellotron, I would probably buy a 4000D from Markus and be quite happy, but I wouldn’t kid myself that this would ever be a real Tron. The last point about the Moog is build quality. Pretty damn good in my opinion. It weighs quite a bit, and has a real steel enclosure. If anyone reads Stereo Review, I ask, would you pay $240,000 for two mono-block amps? Clearly somebody does. (Not I). Happy Thanksgiving.

John

 

From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ClayE
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:25 PM
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

 

 

The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog Voyager Old School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little Phatty slim is $849.00. All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod and pitch wheels. If you don't already have a good controller keyboard, the Little Phatty stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.

Clay

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, gino wong <wonggster@...> wrote:
>
> Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> £ 1250 is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according
> to quality. If well kept a lot more.
>
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch <kinchmusic@...> wrote:
>
> > **
> >
> >
> > **And can be bought for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> >
> > Andy Kinch
> > kinchmusic@...
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ClayE <ecclesreinson@...>
> > To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> >
> >
> > Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many
> > good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one.
> > http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think
> > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...
> > The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the
> > Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> >
> > For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> >
> > Clay
> >
> > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Marshall" <paulm@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Mike,
> > >
> > >
> > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am
> > in the UK like yourself.
> > >
> > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is
> > on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up
> > metal box).
> > >
> > > I've had 2 issues since then
> > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I
> > think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have
> > replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
> > diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > >
> > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which
> > connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean
> > them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I
> > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > >
> > > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound
> > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which
> > should be around for some time to come.
> > >
> > > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape
> > :-o ?
> > >
> > > cheers Paul M.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Chris Dale
> > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Mike,
> > >
> > > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in
> > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending
> > on some variables.
> > >
> > >
> > > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this
> > matters a lot to you.
> > >
> > > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the
> > ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I
> > believe).
> > >
> > > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the
> > name mini-moog).
> > >
> > > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the
> > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > >
> > > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
> > oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and
> > (some say better) sound.
> > >
> > > Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off
> > from the electronics.
> > > Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard
> > and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it
> > to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage
> > everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
> > electronics.
> > >
> > > The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues
> > back when I got mine.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > >
> > > But it is something to be aware of.
> > >
> > >
> > > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or
> > new oscillator cards.
> > >
> > > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> > Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > >
> > > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
> > /pitch tuning.
> > > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> > >
> > > Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple
> > parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a
> > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > >
> > > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an
> > informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > >
> > >
> > > Chris
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
> > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary
> > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are
> > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot
> > even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Mike
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > >
> > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > >
> > > http://www.eset.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > >
> > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > >
> > > http://www.eset.com
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *
> *
> *Gino Wong Birgelo*
> BSComm, BSEE,
> ReRED Recording, *Analog Sound Design*
> *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics*
>
> *Ginowong@...*
> *
> *
>

Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-19 by tron400

John,

Do you have a Q150 filter in your Dotcom? I don't have a Minimoog to compare it to, but my Q150 does a pretty convincing job of imitating the Moog filters I've heard on recordings. There are also 3rd party filters that some people claim do an even better job than the Q150.

An interesting trick I've found with the Q106 is to put the range selector half-way between the Low and the 32' markings to drop an octave lower than the oscillator is normally capable of.

Bernie

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, John Hammaren <hammaren@...> wrote:
>
> In a general sense, your point is correct (about those keys being overpriced) for 95% of the user population. And the same thing can be said for everything from automobiles to Mellotrons. I have not played the Phatty and have no interest, since I have a Voyager Signature. I do know that no amount to patching on my Dotcom will ever produce the fat sound one can get from the Voyager. Close, but not the same. And Minimoog (classic) aficionados will argue the Voyagers don't match a finely maintained Minimoog. If I didn't own a Mellotron, I would probably buy a 4000D from Markus and be quite happy, but I wouldn't kid myself that this would ever be a real Tron. The last point about the Moog is build quality. Pretty damn good in my opinion. It weighs quite a bit, and has a real steel enclosure. If anyone reads Stereo Review, I ask, would you pay $240,000 for two mono-block amps? Clearly somebody does. (Not I). Happy Thanksgiving.
> John
>
> From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ClayE
> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:25 PM
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
>
>
>
> The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog Voyager Old School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little Phatty slim is $849.00. All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod and pitch wheels. If you don't already have a good controller keyboard, the Little Phatty stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.
>
> Clay
>
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, gino wong <wonggster@<mailto:wonggster@>> wrote:
> >
> > Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> > £ 1250 is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according
> > to quality. If well kept a lot more.
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch <kinchmusic@<mailto:kinchmusic@>> wrote:
> >
> > > **
> > >
> > >
> > > **And can be bought for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> > >
> > > Andy Kinch
> > > kinchmusic@
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ClayE <ecclesreinson@<mailto:ecclesreinson@>>
> > > To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > >
> > >
> > > Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many
> > > good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one.
> > > http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think
> > > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...
> > > The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the
> > > Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> > >
> > > For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> > >
> > > Clay
> > >
> > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, "Paul Marshall" <paulm@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Mike,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am
> > > in the UK like yourself.
> > > >
> > > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is
> > > on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up
> > > metal box).
> > > >
> > > > I've had 2 issues since then
> > > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I
> > > think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have
> > > replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
> > > diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > > >
> > > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which
> > > connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean
> > > them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I
> > > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > > >
> > > > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound
> > > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which
> > > should be around for some time to come.
> > > >
> > > > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape
> > > :-o ?
> > > >
> > > > cheers Paul M.
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Chris Dale
> > > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike,
> > > >
> > > > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in
> > > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending
> > > on some variables.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this
> > > matters a lot to you.
> > > >
> > > > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the
> > > ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I
> > > believe).
> > > >
> > > > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the
> > > name mini-moog).
> > > >
> > > > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the
> > > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > > >
> > > > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
> > > oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and
> > > (some say better) sound.
> > > >
> > > > Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off
> > > from the electronics.
> > > > Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard
> > > and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it
> > > to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage
> > > everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
> > > electronics.
> > > >
> > > > The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues
> > > back when I got mine.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > > >
> > > > But it is something to be aware of.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or
> > > new oscillator cards.
> > > >
> > > > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> > > Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > > >
> > > > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
> > > /pitch tuning.
> > > > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> > > >
> > > > Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple
> > > parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a
> > > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > > >
> > > > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an
> > > informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Chris
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
> > > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary
> > > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are
> > > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot
> > > even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *
> > *
> > *Gino Wong Birgelo*
> > BSComm, BSEE,
> > ReRED Recording, *Analog Sound Design*
> > *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics*
> >
> > *Ginowong@*<mailto:*Ginowong@*>
> > *
> > *
> >
>

RE: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-19 by Mark Wallis


Mike-

  If it's affordable, bite the guy's hand off even if it's not working perfectly. Old Minimoogs are eminently fixable and it doesn't have to cost a fortune. They're only going to get more expensive.

Andy T-

Thank you sir! :-)

Best Whooshes,

MSWx
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
From: tron400@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:33:29 +0000
Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

 
John,

Do you have a Q150 filter in your Dotcom? I don't have a Minimoog to compare it to, but my Q150 does a pretty convincing job of imitating the Moog filters I've heard on recordings. There are also 3rd party filters that some people claim do an even better job than the Q150.

An interesting trick I've found with the Q106 is to put the range selector half-way between the Low and the 32' markings to drop an octave lower than the oscillator is normally capable of.

Bernie

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, John Hammaren <hammaren@...> wrote:
>
> In a general sense, your point is correct (about those keys being overpriced) for 95% of the user population. And the same thing can be said for everything from automobiles to Mellotrons. I have not played the Phatty and have no interest, since I have a Voyager Signature. I do know that no amount to patching on my Dotcom will ever produce the fat sound one can get from the Voyager. Close, but not the same. And Minimoog (classic) aficionados will argue the Voyagers don't match a finely maintained Minimoog. If I didn't own a Mellotron, I would probably buy a 4000D from Markus and be quite happy, but I wouldn't kid myself that this would ever be a real Tron. The last point about the Moog is build quality. Pretty damn good in my opinion. It weighs quite a bit, and has a real steel enclosure. If anyone reads Stereo Review, I ask, would you pay $240,000 for two mono-block amps? Clearly somebody does. (Not I). Happy Thanksgiving.
> John
>
> From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ClayE
> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:25 PM
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
>
>
>
> The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog Voyager Old School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little Phatty slim is $849.00. All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod and pitch wheels. If you don't already have a good controller keyboard, the Little Phatty stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.
>
> Clay
>
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, gino wong <wonggster@<mailto:wonggster@>> wrote:
> >
> > Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> > £ 1250 is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according
> > to quality. If well kept a lot more.
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch <kinchmusic@<mailto:kinchmusic@>> wrote:
> >
> > > **
> > >
> > >
> > > **And can be bought for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> > >
> > > Andy Kinch
> > > kinchmusic@
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ClayE <ecclesreinson@<mailto:ecclesreinson@>>
> > > To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > >
> > >
> > > Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many
> > > good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one.
> > > http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think
> > > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...
> > > The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the
> > > Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> > >
> > > For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> > >
> > > Clay
> > >
> > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, "Paul Marshall" <paulm@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Mike,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am
> > > in the UK like yourself.
> > > >
> > > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is
> > > on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up
> > > metal box).
> > > >
> > > > I've had 2 issues since then
> > > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I
> > > think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have
> > > replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
> > > diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > > >
> > > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which
> > > connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean
> > > them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I
> > > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > > >
> > > > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound
> > > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which
> > > should be around for some time to come.
> > > >
> > > > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape
> > > :-o ?
> > > >
> > > > cheers Paul M.
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Chris Dale
> > > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike,
> > > >
> > > > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in
> > > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending
> > > on some variables.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this
> > > matters a lot to you.
> > > >
> > > > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the
> > > ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I
> > > believe).
> > > >
> > > > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the
> > > name mini-moog).
> > > >
> > > > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the
> > > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > > >
> > > > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
> > > oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and
> > > (some say better) sound.
> > > >
> > > > Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off
> > > from the electronics.
> > > > Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard
> > > and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it
> > > to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage
> > > everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
> > > electronics.
> > > >
> > > > The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues
> > > back when I got mine.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > > >
> > > > But it is something to be aware of.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or
> > > new oscillator cards.
> > > >
> > > > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> > > Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > > >
> > > > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
> > > /pitch tuning.
> > > > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> > > >
> > > > Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple
> > > parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a
> > > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > > >
> > > > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an
> > > informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Chris
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
> > > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary
> > > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are
> > > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot
> > > even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *
> > *
> > *Gino Wong Birgelo*
> > BSComm, BSEE,
> > ReRED Recording, *Analog Sound Design*
> > *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics*
> >
> > *Ginowong@*<mailto:*Ginowong@*>
> > *
> > *
> >
>


RE: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-20 by John Hammaren

Hi Bernie,

 

Yup, more than a few Q150s. It’s good, not just not that good. I’ve never heard Roger Arrick proclaim otherwise. The MOTM oscillator,  MOTM-300 – now that’s an oscillator. I repaired one for a friend and had to admit, it did sound better than the Q-150. Fatter, but still not in the Voyager class. Build quality is lacking compared to the Q-150, and therefore will probably never be under my Christmas tree for the price.

Of course, I don’t proclaim myself to hold a candle compared to some other Dotcommies, and thus is my point about the 5%. It’s like reading a discussion about Arturia’s MinimoogV. I don’t have time to take out the scope, but some do and you get the whole magilla in a detail beyond my needs, with phasing nuances and all that. Our ears are each unique and what sounds great to me may sound like crap to others. I’ve heard stories that some people with perfect pitch cannot listen to well-tempered music – it is perceived to be so out of tune. Fascinating, and sad for them. Thanks for the tip – I’ll check it out. Come to think of it, I wonder how the Tron would sound to that perfect-pitched individual? (I had to the Tron in to stay on topic.) J

Regards, John

 

From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of tron400
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 8:33 AM
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

 

 

John,

Do you have a Q150 filter in your Dotcom? I don't have a Minimoog to compare it to, but my Q150 does a pretty convincing job of imitating the Moog filters I've heard on recordings. There are also 3rd party filters that some people claim do an even better job than the Q150.

An interesting trick I've found with the Q106 is to put the range selector half-way between the Low and the 32' markings to drop an octave lower than the oscillator is normally capable of.

Bernie

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, John Hammaren <hammaren@...> wrote:
>
> In a general sense, your point is correct (about those keys being overpriced) for 95% of the user population. And the same thing can be said for everything from automobiles to Mellotrons. I have not played the Phatty and have no interest, since I have a Voyager Signature. I do know that no amount to patching on my Dotcom will ever produce the fat sound one can get from the Voyager. Close, but not the same. And Minimoog (classic) aficionados will argue the Voyagers don't match a finely maintained Minimoog. If I didn't own a Mellotron, I would probably buy a 4000D from Markus and be quite happy, but I wouldn't kid myself that this would ever be a real Tron. The last point about the Moog is build quality. Pretty damn good in my opinion. It weighs quite a bit, and has a real steel enclosure. If anyone reads Stereo Review, I ask, would you pay $240,000 for two mono-block amps? Clearly somebody does. (Not I). Happy Thanksgiving.
> John
>
> From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ClayE
> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:25 PM
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
>
>
>
> The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog Voyager Old School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little Phatty slim is $849.00. All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod and pitch wheels. If you don't already have a good controller keyboard, the Little Phatty stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.
>
> Clay
>
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, gino wong <wonggster@<mailto:wonggster@>> wrote:
> >
> > Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> > £ 1250 is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according
> > to quality. If well kept a lot more.
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch <kinchmusic@<mailto:kinchmusic@>> wrote:
> >
> > > **
> > >
> > >
> > > **And can be bought for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> > >
> > > Andy Kinch
> > > kinchmusic@
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ClayE <ecclesreinson@<mailto:ecclesreinson@>>
> > > To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > >
> > >
> > > Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many
> > > good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one.
> > > http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think
> > > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...
> > > The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the
> > > Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> > >
> > > For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> > >
> > > Clay
> > >
> > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, "Paul Marshall" <paulm@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Mike,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am
> > > in the UK like yourself.
> > > >
> > > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is
> > > on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up
> > > metal box).
> > > >
> > > > I've had 2 issues since then
> > > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I
> > > think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have
> > > replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
> > > diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > > >
> > > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which
> > > connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean
> > > them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I
> > > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > > >
> > > > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound
> > > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which
> > > should be around for some time to come.
> > > >
> > > > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape
> > > :-o ?
> > > >
> > > > cheers Paul M.
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Chris Dale
> > > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike,
> > > >
> > > > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in
> > > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending
> > > on some variables.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this
> > > matters a lot to you.
> > > >
> > > > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the
> > > ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I
> > > believe).
> > > >
> > > > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the
> > > name mini-moog).
> > > >
> > > > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the
> > > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > > >
> > > > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
> > > oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and
> > > (some say better) sound.
> > > >
> > > > Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off
> > > from the electronics.
> > > > Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard
> > > and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it
> > > to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage
> > > everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
> > > electronics.
> > > >
> > > > The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues
> > > back when I got mine.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > > >
> > > > But it is something to be aware of.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or
> > > new oscillator cards.
> > > >
> > > > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> > > Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > > >
> > > > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
> > > /pitch tuning.
> > > > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> > > >
> > > > Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple
> > > parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a
> > > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > > >
> > > > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an
> > > informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Chris
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
> > > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary
> > > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are
> > > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot
> > > even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *
> > *
> > *Gino Wong Birgelo*
> > BSComm, BSEE,
> > ReRED Recording, *Analog Sound Design*
> > *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics*
> >
> > *Ginowong@*<mailto:*Ginowong@*>
> > *
> > *
> >
>

RE: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-20 by John Hammaren

Bernie,

 

Forgive my seeming confusion. I have no idea how that tangent started. The result of just getting over the flu. In any case, the Q106 is a fine filter, it’s just not a Moog, IMHO. I do feel the oscillator Q-150 vs Moog or MOTM does its own part in the fatness equation, since I did run the MOTM through a 106 as well as the Q150 and the MOTM won that contest. So, anyway, in case you wondered what I was smoking – it was just my bad read of your note.

 

From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of tron400
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 8:33 AM
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

 

 

John,

Do you have a Q150 filter in your Dotcom? I don't have a Minimoog to compare it to, but my Q150 does a pretty convincing job of imitating the Moog filters I've heard on recordings. There are also 3rd party filters that some people claim do an even better job than the Q150.

An interesting trick I've found with the Q106 is to put the range selector half-way between the Low and the 32' markings to drop an octave lower than the oscillator is normally capable of.

Bernie

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, John Hammaren <hammaren@...> wrote:
>
> In a general sense, your point is correct (about those keys being overpriced) for 95% of the user population. And the same thing can be said for everything from automobiles to Mellotrons. I have not played the Phatty and have no interest, since I have a Voyager Signature. I do know that no amount to patching on my Dotcom will ever produce the fat sound one can get from the Voyager. Close, but not the same. And Minimoog (classic) aficionados will argue the Voyagers don't match a finely maintained Minimoog. If I didn't own a Mellotron, I would probably buy a 4000D from Markus and be quite happy, but I wouldn't kid myself that this would ever be a real Tron. The last point about the Moog is build quality. Pretty damn good in my opinion. It weighs quite a bit, and has a real steel enclosure. If anyone reads Stereo Review, I ask, would you pay $240,000 for two mono-block amps? Clearly somebody does. (Not I). Happy Thanksgiving.
> John
>
> From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ClayE
> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:25 PM
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
>
>
>
> The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog Voyager Old School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little Phatty slim is $849.00. All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod and pitch wheels. If you don't already have a good controller keyboard, the Little Phatty stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.
>
> Clay
>
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, gino wong <wonggster@<mailto:wonggster@>> wrote:
> >
> > Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> > £ 1250 is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according
> > to quality. If well kept a lot more.
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch <kinchmusic@<mailto:kinchmusic@>> wrote:
> >
> > > **
> > >
> > >
> > > **And can be bought for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> > >
> > > Andy Kinch
> > > kinchmusic@
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ClayE <ecclesreinson@<mailto:ecclesreinson@>>
> > > To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > >
> > >
> > > Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many
> > > good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one.
> > > http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think
> > > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...
> > > The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the
> > > Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> > >
> > > For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> > >
> > > Clay
> > >
> > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, "Paul Marshall" <paulm@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Mike,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am
> > > in the UK like yourself.
> > > >
> > > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is
> > > on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up
> > > metal box).
> > > >
> > > > I've had 2 issues since then
> > > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I
> > > think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have
> > > replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
> > > diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > > >
> > > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which
> > > connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean
> > > them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I
> > > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > > >
> > > > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound
> > > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which
> > > should be around for some time to come.
> > > >
> > > > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape
> > > :-o ?
> > > >
> > > > cheers Paul M.
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Chris Dale
> > > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike,
> > > >
> > > > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in
> > > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending
> > > on some variables.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this
> > > matters a lot to you.
> > > >
> > > > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the
> > > ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I
> > > believe).
> > > >
> > > > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the
> > > name mini-moog).
> > > >
> > > > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the
> > > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > > >
> > > > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
> > > oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and
> > > (some say better) sound.
> > > >
> > > > Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off
> > > from the electronics.
> > > > Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard
> > > and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it
> > > to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage
> > > everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
> > > electronics.
> > > >
> > > > The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues
> > > back when I got mine.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > > >
> > > > But it is something to be aware of.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or
> > > new oscillator cards.
> > > >
> > > > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> > > Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > > >
> > > > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
> > > /pitch tuning.
> > > > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> > > >
> > > > Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple
> > > parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a
> > > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > > >
> > > > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an
> > > informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Chris
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
> > > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary
> > > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are
> > > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot
> > > even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *
> > *
> > *Gino Wong Birgelo*
> > BSComm, BSEE,
> > ReRED Recording, *Analog Sound Design*
> > *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics*
> >
> > *Ginowong@*<mailto:*Ginowong@*>
> > *
> > *
> >
>

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-20 by gino wong

If I may add to the discussion  

For me  a Minimoog is something I need to own before I die, just like the Mellotron underneath it.

gino wong


On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Mark Wallis <markstuartwallis@hotmail.com> wrote:
 


Mike-

  If it's affordable, bite the guy's hand off even if it's not working perfectly. Old Minimoogs are eminently fixable and it doesn't have to cost a fortune. They're only going to get more expensive.

Andy T-

Thank you sir! :-)

Best Whooshes,

MSWx
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
From: tron400@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:33:29 +0000

Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

 
John,

Do you have a Q150 filter in your Dotcom? I don't have a Minimoog to compare it to, but my Q150 does a pretty convincing job of imitating the Moog filters I've heard on recordings. There are also 3rd party filters that some people claim do an even better job than the Q150.

An interesting trick I've found with the Q106 is to put the range selector half-way between the Low and the 32' markings to drop an octave lower than the oscillator is normally capable of.

Bernie

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, John Hammaren <hammaren@...> wrote:
>
> In a general sense, your point is correct (about those keys being overpriced) for 95% of the user population. And the same thing can be said for everything from automobiles to Mellotrons. I have not played the Phatty and have no interest, since I have a Voyager Signature. I do know that no amount to patching on my Dotcom will ever produce the fat sound one can get from the Voyager. Close, but not the same. And Minimoog (classic) aficionados will argue the Voyagers don't match a finely maintained Minimoog. If I didn't own a Mellotron, I would probably buy a 4000D from Markus and be quite happy, but I wouldn't kid myself that this would ever be a real Tron. The last point about the Moog is build quality. Pretty damn good in my opinion. It weighs quite a bit, and has a real steel enclosure. If anyone reads Stereo Review, I ask, would you pay $240,000 for two mono-block amps? Clearly somebody does. (Not I). Happy Thanksgiving.
> John
>
> From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ClayE
> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:25 PM
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
>
>
>
> The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog Voyager Old School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little Phatty slim is $849.00. All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod and pitch wheels. If you don't already have a good controller keyboard, the Little Phatty stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.
>
> Clay
>
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, gino wong <wonggster@<mailto:wonggster@>> wrote:
> >
> > Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> > £ 1250 is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according
> > to quality. If well kept a lot more.
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch <kinchmusic@<mailto:kinchmusic@>> wrote:
> >
> > > **
> > >
> > >
> > > **And can be bought for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> > >
> > > Andy Kinch
> > > kinchmusic@
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ClayE <ecclesreinson@<mailto:ecclesreinson@>>
> > > To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > >
> > >
> > > Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many
> > > good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one.
> > > http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think
> > > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...
> > > The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the
> > > Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> > >
> > > For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> > >
> > > Clay
> > >
> > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, "Paul Marshall" <paulm@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Mike,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am
> > > in the UK like yourself.
> > > >
> > > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is
> > > on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up
> > > metal box).
> > > >
> > > > I've had 2 issues since then
> > > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I
> > > think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have
> > > replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
> > > diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > > >
> > > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which
> > > connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean
> > > them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I
> > > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > > >
> > > > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound
> > > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which
> > > should be around for some time to come.
> > > >
> > > > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape
> > > :-o ?
> > > >
> > > > cheers Paul M.
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Chris Dale
> > > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike,
> > > >
> > > > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in
> > > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending
> > > on some variables.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this
> > > matters a lot to you.
> > > >
> > > > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the
> > > ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I
> > > believe).
> > > >
> > > > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the
> > > name mini-moog).
> > > >
> > > > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the
> > > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > > >
> > > > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
> > > oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and
> > > (some say better) sound.
> > > >
> > > > Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off
> > > from the electronics.
> > > > Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard
> > > and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it
> > > to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage
> > > everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
> > > electronics.
> > > >
> > > > The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues
> > > back when I got mine.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > > >
> > > > But it is something to be aware of.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or
> > > new oscillator cards.
> > > >
> > > > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> > > Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > > >
> > > > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
> > > /pitch tuning.
> > > > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> > > >
> > > > Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple
> > > parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a
> > > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > > >
> > > > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an
> > > informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Chris
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
> > > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary
> > > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are
> > > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot
> > > even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *
> > *
> > *Gino Wong Birgelo*
> > BSComm, BSEE,
> > ReRED Recording, *Analog Sound Design*
> > *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics*
> >
> > *Ginowong@*<mailto:*Ginowong@*>
> > *
> > *
> >
>





--

Gino Wong Birgelo
BSComm, BSEE,
ReRED Recording, Analog Sound Design
Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics




RE: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-20 by Mark Wallis


Same here. It doesn't do everything but what it does do is beautiful..

To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
From: wonggster@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 19:38:26 -0500
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

 

If I may add to the discussion  

For me  a Minimoog is something I need to own before I die, just like the Mellotron underneath it.

gino wong


On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Mark Wallis <markstuartwallis@hotmail.com> wrote:
 


Mike-

  If it's affordable, bite the guy's hand off even if it's not working perfectly. Old Minimoogs are eminently fixable and it doesn't have to cost a fortune. They're only going to get more expensive.

Andy T-

Thank you sir! :-)

Best Whooshes,

MSWx
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
From: tron400@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:33:29 +0000

Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

 
John,

Do you have a Q150 filter in your Dotcom? I don't have a Minimoog to compare it to, but my Q150 does a pretty convincing job of imitating the Moog filters I've heard on recordings. There are also 3rd party filters that some people claim do an even better job than the Q150.

An interesting trick I've found with the Q106 is to put the range selector half-way between the Low and the 32' markings to drop an octave lower than the oscillator is normally capable of.

Bernie

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, John Hammaren <hammaren@...> wrote:
>
> In a general sense, your point is correct (about those keys being overpriced) for 95% of the user population. And the same thing can be said for everything from automobiles to Mellotrons. I have not played the Phatty and have no interest, since I have a Voyager Signature. I do know that no amount to patching on my Dotcom will ever produce the fat sound one can get from the Voyager. Close, but not the same. And Minimoog (classic) aficionados will argue the Voyagers don't match a finely maintained Minimoog. If I didn't own a Mellotron, I would probably buy a 4000D from Markus and be quite happy, but I wouldn't kid myself that this would ever be a real Tron. The last point about the Moog is build quality. Pretty damn good in my opinion. It weighs quite a bit, and has a real steel enclosure. If anyone reads Stereo Review, I ask, would you pay $240,000 for two mono-block amps? Clearly somebody does. (Not I). Happy Thanksgiving.
> John
>
> From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ClayE
> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:25 PM
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
>
>
>
> The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog Voyager Old School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little Phatty slim is $849.00. All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod and pitch wheels. If you don't already have a good controller keyboard, the Little Phatty stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.
>
> Clay
>
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, gino wong <wonggster@<mailto:wonggster@>> wrote:
> >
> > Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> > £ 1250 is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according
> > to quality. If well kept a lot more.
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch <kinchmusic@<mailto:kinchmusic@>> wrote:
> >
> > > **
> > >
> > >
> > > **And can be bought for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> > >
> > > Andy Kinch
> > > kinchmusic@
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ClayE <ecclesreinson@<mailto:ecclesreinson@>>
> > > To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > >
> > >
> > > Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many
> > > good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one.
> > > http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think
> > > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...
> > > The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the
> > > Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> > >
> > > For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> > >
> > > Clay
> > >
> > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, "Paul Marshall" <paulm@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Mike,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am
> > > in the UK like yourself.
> > > >
> > > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is
> > > on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up
> > > metal box).
> > > >
> > > > I've had 2 issues since then
> > > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I
> > > think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have
> > > replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
> > > diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > > >
> > > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which
> > > connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean
> > > them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I
> > > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > > >
> > > > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound
> > > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which
> > > should be around for some time to come.
> > > >
> > > > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape
> > > :-o ?
> > > >
> > > > cheers Paul M.
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Chris Dale
> > > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike,
> > > >
> > > > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in
> > > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending
> > > on some variables.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this
> > > matters a lot to you.
> > > >
> > > > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the
> > > ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I
> > > believe).
> > > >
> > > > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the
> > > name mini-moog).
> > > >
> > > > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the
> > > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > > >
> > > > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
> > > oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and
> > > (some say better) sound.
> > > >
> > > > Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off
> > > from the electronics.
> > > > Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard
> > > and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it
> > > to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage
> > > everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
> > > electronics.
> > > >
> > > > The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues
> > > back when I got mine.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > > >
> > > > But it is something to be aware of.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or
> > > new oscillator cards.
> > > >
> > > > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> > > Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > > >
> > > > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
> > > /pitch tuning.
> > > > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> > > >
> > > > Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple
> > > parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a
> > > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > > >
> > > > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an
> > > informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Chris
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
> > > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary
> > > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are
> > > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot
> > > even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *
> > *
> > *Gino Wong Birgelo*
> > BSComm, BSEE,
> > ReRED Recording, *Analog Sound Design*
> > *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics*
> >
> > *Ginowong@*<mailto:*Ginowong@*>
> > *
> > *
> >
>






--

Gino Wong Birgelo
BSComm, BSEE,
ReRED Recording, Analog Sound Design
Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics





Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-20 by gino wong

I was going to run down this whole long list of Moog stuff I got recently for the same money but if somebody had dangled a life list item in front of me, discussion would have ensued.

Aside from the Minimoog do you have any other items on your bucket list Mike ?



On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Mark Wallis <markstuartwallis@hotmail.com> wrote:
 


Same here. It doesn't do everything but what it does do is beautiful..

To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
From: wonggster@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 19:38:26 -0500
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

 

If I may add to the discussion  

For me  a Minimoog is something I need to own before I die, just like the Mellotron underneath it.

gino wong


On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Mark Wallis <markstuartwallis@hotmail.com> wrote:
 


Mike-

  If it's affordable, bite the guy's hand off even if it's not working perfectly. Old Minimoogs are eminently fixable and it doesn't have to cost a fortune. They're only going to get more expensive.

Andy T-

Thank you sir! :-)

Best Whooshes,

MSWx
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
From: tron400@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:33:29 +0000

Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

 
John,

Do you have a Q150 filter in your Dotcom? I don't have a Minimoog to compare it to, but my Q150 does a pretty convincing job of imitating the Moog filters I've heard on recordings. There are also 3rd party filters that some people claim do an even better job than the Q150.

An interesting trick I've found with the Q106 is to put the range selector half-way between the Low and the 32' markings to drop an octave lower than the oscillator is normally capable of.

Bernie

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, John Hammaren <hammaren@...> wrote:
>
> In a general sense, your point is correct (about those keys being overpriced) for 95% of the user population. And the same thing can be said for everything from automobiles to Mellotrons. I have not played the Phatty and have no interest, since I have a Voyager Signature. I do know that no amount to patching on my Dotcom will ever produce the fat sound one can get from the Voyager. Close, but not the same. And Minimoog (classic) aficionados will argue the Voyagers don't match a finely maintained Minimoog. If I didn't own a Mellotron, I would probably buy a 4000D from Markus and be quite happy, but I wouldn't kid myself that this would ever be a real Tron. The last point about the Moog is build quality. Pretty damn good in my opinion. It weighs quite a bit, and has a real steel enclosure. If anyone reads Stereo Review, I ask, would you pay $240,000 for two mono-block amps? Clearly somebody does. (Not I). Happy Thanksgiving.
> John
>
> From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ClayE
> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:25 PM
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
>
>
>
> The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog Voyager Old School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little Phatty slim is $849.00. All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod and pitch wheels. If you don't already have a good controller keyboard, the Little Phatty stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.
>
> Clay
>
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, gino wong <wonggster@<mailto:wonggster@>> wrote:
> >
> > Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> > £ 1250 is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according
> > to quality. If well kept a lot more.
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch <kinchmusic@<mailto:kinchmusic@>> wrote:
> >
> > > **
> > >
> > >
> > > **And can be bought for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> > >
> > > Andy Kinch
> > > kinchmusic@
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ClayE <ecclesreinson@<mailto:ecclesreinson@>>
> > > To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > >
> > >
> > > Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many
> > > good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one.
> > > http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think
> > > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...
> > > The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the
> > > Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> > >
> > > For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> > >
> > > Clay
> > >
> > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, "Paul Marshall" <paulm@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Mike,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am
> > > in the UK like yourself.
> > > >
> > > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is
> > > on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up
> > > metal box).
> > > >
> > > > I've had 2 issues since then
> > > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I
> > > think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have
> > > replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
> > > diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > > >
> > > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which
> > > connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean
> > > them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I
> > > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > > >
> > > > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound
> > > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which
> > > should be around for some time to come.
> > > >
> > > > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape
> > > :-o ?
> > > >
> > > > cheers Paul M.
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Chris Dale
> > > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike,
> > > >
> > > > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in
> > > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending
> > > on some variables.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this
> > > matters a lot to you.
> > > >
> > > > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the
> > > ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I
> > > believe).
> > > >
> > > > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the
> > > name mini-moog).
> > > >
> > > > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the
> > > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > > >
> > > > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
> > > oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and
> > > (some say better) sound.
> > > >
> > > > Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off
> > > from the electronics.
> > > > Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard
> > > and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it
> > > to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage
> > > everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
> > > electronics.
> > > >
> > > > The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues
> > > back when I got mine.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > > >
> > > > But it is something to be aware of.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or
> > > new oscillator cards.
> > > >
> > > > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> > > Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > > >
> > > > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
> > > /pitch tuning.
> > > > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> > > >
> > > > Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple
> > > parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a
> > > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > > >
> > > > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an
> > > informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Chris
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
> > > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary
> > > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are
> > > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot
> > > even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *
> > *
> > *Gino Wong Birgelo*
> > BSComm, BSEE,
> > ReRED Recording, *Analog Sound Design*
> > *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics*
> >
> > *Ginowong@*<mailto:*Ginowong@*>
> > *
> > *
> >
>






--

Gino Wong Birgelo
BSComm, BSEE,
ReRED Recording, Analog Sound Design
Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics








--

Gino Wong Birgelo
BSComm, BSEE,
ReRED Recording, Analog Sound Design
Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics




Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-20 by lsf5275@aol.com

If you get one, after you die, can I have it?
 
Frank  (just wondering)
 
In a message dated 11/19/2012 7:39:08 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, wonggster@gmail.com writes:
 

If I may add to the discussion  

For me  a Minimoog is something I need to own before I die, just like the Mellotron underneath it.

gino wong


On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Mark Wallis <markstuartwallis@hotmail.com> wrote:
 


Mike-

  If it's affordable, bite the guy's hand off even if it's not working perfectly. Old Minimoogs are eminently fixable and it doesn't have to cost a fortune. They're only going to get more expensive.

Andy T-

Thank you sir! :-)

Best Whooshes,

MSWx
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
From: tron400@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:33:29 +0000

Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

 
John,

Do you have a Q150 filter in your Dotcom? I don't have a Minimoog to compare it to, but my Q150 does a pretty convincing job of imitating the Moog filters I've heard on recordings. There are also 3rd party filters that some people claim do an even better job than the Q150.

An interesting trick I've found with the Q106 is to put the range selector half-way between the Low and the 32' markings to drop an octave lower than the oscillator is normally capable of.

Bernie

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, John Hammaren <hammaren@...> wrote:
>
> In a general sense, your point is correct (about those keys being overpriced) for 95% of the user population. And the same thing can be said for everything from automobiles to Mellotrons. I have not played the Phatty and have no interest, since I have a Voyager Signature. I do know that no amount to patching on my Dotcom will ever produce the fat sound one can get from the Voyager. Close, but not the same. And Minimoog (classic) aficionados will argue the Voyagers don't match a finely maintained Minimoog. If I didn't own a Mellotron, I would probably buy a 4000D from Markus and be quite happy, but I wouldn't kid myself that this would ever be a real Tron. The last point about the Moog is build quality. Pretty damn good in my opinion. It weighs quite a bit, and has a real steel enclosure. If anyone reads Stereo Review, I ask, would you pay $240,000 for two mono-block amps? Clearly somebody does. (Not I). Happy Thanksgiving.
> John
>
> From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ClayE
> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:25 PM
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
>
>
>
> The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog Voyager Old School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little Phatty slim is $849.00. All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod and pitch wheels. If you don't already have a good controller keyboard, the Little Phatty stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.
>
> Clay
>
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, gino wong <wonggster@<mailto:wonggster@>> wrote:
> >
> > Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> > £ 1250 is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according
> > to quality. If well kept a lot more.
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch <kinchmusic@<mailto:kinchmusic@>> wrote:
> >
> > > **
> > >
> > >
> > > **And can be bought for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> > >
> > > Andy Kinch
> > > kinchmusic@
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ClayE <ecclesreinson@<mailto:ecclesreinson@>>
> > > To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > >
> > >
> > > Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many
> > > good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one.
> > > http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think
> > > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...
> > > The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the
> > > Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> > >
> > > For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> > >
> > > Clay
> > >
> > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, "Paul Marshall" <paulm@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Mike,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am
> > > in the UK like yourself.
> > > >
> > > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is
> > > on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up
> > > metal box).
> > > >
> > > > I've had 2 issues since then
> > > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I
> > > think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have
> > > replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
> > > diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > > >
> > > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which
> > > connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean
> > > them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I
> > > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > > >
> > > > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound
> > > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which
> > > should be around for some time to come.
> > > >
> > > > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape
> > > :-o ?
> > > >
> > > > cheers Paul M.
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Chris Dale
> > > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike,
> > > >
> > > > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in
> > > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending
> > > on some variables.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this
> > > matters a lot to you.
> > > >
> > > > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the
> > > ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I
> > > believe).
> > > >
> > > > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the
> > > name mini-moog).
> > > >
> > > > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the
> > > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > > >
> > > > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
> > > oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and
> > > (some say better) sound.
> > > >
> > > > Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off
> > > from the electronics.
> > > > Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard
> > > and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it
> > > to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage
> > > everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
> > > electronics.
> > > >
> > > > The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues
> > > back when I got mine.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > > >
> > > > But it is something to be aware of.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or
> > > new oscillator cards.
> > > >
> > > > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> > > Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > > >
> > > > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
> > > /pitch tuning.
> > > > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> > > >
> > > > Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple
> > > parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a
> > > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > > >
> > > > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an
> > > informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Chris
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
> > > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary
> > > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are
> > > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot
> > > even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *
> > *
> > *Gino Wong Birgelo*
> > BSComm, BSEE,
> > ReRED Recording, *Analog Sound Design*
> > *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics*
> >
> > *Ginowong@*<mailto:*Ginowong@*>
> > *
> > *
> >
>





--

Gino Wong Birgelo
BSComm, BSEE,
ReRED Recording, Analog Sound Design
Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics




Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-20 by tron400

John,

If you have more than a few Q150's, your system must be pretty large. I have one Q150, a Q107 and a couple of third party filters in a 55 space system (2 portable cabinets and a Box-11 frame). I've considered replacing the Q107 with another Q150 because I really like the sound, but the Q107 is a different animal. The MOTM needs a different power supply, doesn't it? Since I have no intention of expanding my system, I don't think I want to go that route. I had considered trading the whole thing in on a Voyager, but I like the patching freedom I have.

Bernie

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, John Hammaren <hammaren@...> wrote:
>
> Bernie,
>
> Forgive my seeming confusion. I have no idea how that tangent started. The result of just getting over the flu. In any case, the Q106 is a fine filter, it's just not a Moog, IMHO. I do feel the oscillator Q-150 vs Moog or MOTM does its own part in the fatness equation, since I did run the MOTM through a 106 as well as the Q150 and the MOTM won that contest. So, anyway, in case you wondered what I was smoking - it was just my bad read of your note.
>
> From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of tron400
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 8:33 AM
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
>
>
>
> John,
>
> Do you have a Q150 filter in your Dotcom? I don't have a Minimoog to compare it to, but my Q150 does a pretty convincing job of imitating the Moog filters I've heard on recordings. There are also 3rd party filters that some people claim do an even better job than the Q150.
>
> An interesting trick I've found with the Q106 is to put the range selector half-way between the Low and the 32' markings to drop an octave lower than the oscillator is normally capable of.
>
> Bernie
>
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, John Hammaren <hammaren@<mailto:hammaren@>> wrote:
> >
> > In a general sense, your point is correct (about those keys being overpriced) for 95% of the user population. And the same thing can be said for everything from automobiles to Mellotrons. I have not played the Phatty and have no interest, since I have a Voyager Signature. I do know that no amount to patching on my Dotcom will ever produce the fat sound one can get from the Voyager. Close, but not the same. And Minimoog (classic) aficionados will argue the Voyagers don't match a finely maintained Minimoog. If I didn't own a Mellotron, I would probably buy a 4000D from Markus and be quite happy, but I wouldn't kid myself that this would ever be a real Tron. The last point about the Moog is build quality. Pretty damn good in my opinion. It weighs quite a bit, and has a real steel enclosure. If anyone reads Stereo Review, I ask, would you pay $240,000 for two mono-block amps? Clearly somebody does. (Not I). Happy Thanksgiving.
> > John
> >
> > From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of ClayE
> > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:25 PM
> > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> >
> >
> >
> > The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog Voyager Old School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little Phatty slim is $849.00. All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod and pitch wheels. If you don't already have a good controller keyboard, the Little Phatty stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.
> >
> > Clay
> >
> > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, gino wong <wonggster@<mailto:wonggster@>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> > > £ 1250 is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according
> > > to quality. If well kept a lot more.
> > >
> > > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch <kinchmusic@<mailto:kinchmusic@>> wrote:
> > >
> > > > **
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > **And can be bought for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> > > >
> > > > Andy Kinch
> > > > kinchmusic@
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: ClayE <ecclesreinson@<mailto:ecclesreinson@>>
> > > > To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > > > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many
> > > > good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one.
> > > > http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think
> > > > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...
> > > > The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the
> > > > Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> > > >
> > > > For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> > > >
> > > > Clay
> > > >
> > > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, "Paul Marshall" <paulm@>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Mike,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am
> > > > in the UK like yourself.
> > > > >
> > > > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is
> > > > on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up
> > > > metal box).
> > > > >
> > > > > I've had 2 issues since then
> > > > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I
> > > > think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have
> > > > replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
> > > > diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which
> > > > connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean
> > > > them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I
> > > > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > > > >
> > > > > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound
> > > > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which
> > > > should be around for some time to come.
> > > > >
> > > > > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape
> > > > :-o ?
> > > > >
> > > > > cheers Paul M.
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: Chris Dale
> > > > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Mike,
> > > > >
> > > > > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in
> > > > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending
> > > > on some variables.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this
> > > > matters a lot to you.
> > > > >
> > > > > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the
> > > > ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I
> > > > believe).
> > > > >
> > > > > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the
> > > > name mini-moog).
> > > > >
> > > > > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the
> > > > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > > > >
> > > > > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
> > > > oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and
> > > > (some say better) sound.
> > > > >
> > > > > Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off
> > > > from the electronics.
> > > > > Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard
> > > > and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it
> > > > to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage
> > > > everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
> > > > electronics.
> > > > >
> > > > > The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues
> > > > back when I got mine.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > > > >
> > > > > But it is something to be aware of.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or
> > > > new oscillator cards.
> > > > >
> > > > > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> > > > Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > > > >
> > > > > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
> > > > /pitch tuning.
> > > > > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> > > > >
> > > > > Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple
> > > > parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a
> > > > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > > > >
> > > > > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an
> > > > informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Chris
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
> > > > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary
> > > > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > > > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are
> > > > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot
> > > > even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Mike
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > > >
> > > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > > >
> > > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *Gino Wong Birgelo*
> > > BSComm, BSEE,
> > > ReRED Recording, *Analog Sound Design*
> > > *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics*
> > >
> > > *Ginowong@*<mailto:*Ginowong@*>
> > > *
> > > *
> > >
> >
>

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-20 by gino wong

Yeah,  I actually have a list. Don't want my stuff to go to those who can't use it or those who don't deserve it.  EWhy burden your family with stuff they often consider , "his shit"




On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 8:41 PM, <lsf5275@aol.com> wrote:
 

If you get one, after you die, can I have it?
 
Frank  (just wondering)
 
In a message dated 11/19/2012 7:39:08 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, wonggster@gmail.com writes:
 

If I may add to the discussion  

For me  a Minimoog is something I need to own before I die, just like the Mellotron underneath it.

gino wong


On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Mark Wallis <markstuartwallis@hotmail.com> wrote:
 


Mike-

  If it's affordable, bite the guy's hand off even if it's not working perfectly. Old Minimoogs are eminently fixable and it doesn't have to cost a fortune. They're only going to get more expensive.

Andy T-

Thank you sir! :-)

Best Whooshes,

MSWx
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
From: tron400@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:33:29 +0000

Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

 
John,

Do you have a Q150 filter in your Dotcom? I don't have a Minimoog to compare it to, but my Q150 does a pretty convincing job of imitating the Moog filters I've heard on recordings. There are also 3rd party filters that some people claim do an even better job than the Q150.

An interesting trick I've found with the Q106 is to put the range selector half-way between the Low and the 32' markings to drop an octave lower than the oscillator is normally capable of.

Bernie

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, John Hammaren <hammaren@...> wrote:
>
> In a general sense, your point is correct (about those keys being overpriced) for 95% of the user population. And the same thing can be said for everything from automobiles to Mellotrons. I have not played the Phatty and have no interest, since I have a Voyager Signature. I do know that no amount to patching on my Dotcom will ever produce the fat sound one can get from the Voyager. Close, but not the same. And Minimoog (classic) aficionados will argue the Voyagers don't match a finely maintained Minimoog. If I didn't own a Mellotron, I would probably buy a 4000D from Markus and be quite happy, but I wouldn't kid myself that this would ever be a real Tron. The last point about the Moog is build quality. Pretty damn good in my opinion. It weighs quite a bit, and has a real steel enclosure. If anyone reads Stereo Review, I ask, would you pay $240,000 for two mono-block amps? Clearly somebody does. (Not I). Happy Thanksgiving.
> John
>
> From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ClayE
> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:25 PM
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
>
>
>
> The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog Voyager Old School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little Phatty slim is $849.00. All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod and pitch wheels. If you don't already have a good controller keyboard, the Little Phatty stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.
>
> Clay
>
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, gino wong <wonggster@<mailto:wonggster@>> wrote:
> >
> > Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> > £ 1250 is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according
> > to quality. If well kept a lot more.
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch <kinchmusic@<mailto:kinchmusic@>> wrote:
> >
> > > **
> > >
> > >
> > > **And can be bought for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> > >
> > > Andy Kinch
> > > kinchmusic@
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ClayE <ecclesreinson@<mailto:ecclesreinson@>>
> > > To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > >
> > >
> > > Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many
> > > good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one.
> > > http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think
> > > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...
> > > The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the
> > > Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> > >
> > > For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> > >
> > > Clay
> > >
> > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, "Paul Marshall" <paulm@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Mike,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am
> > > in the UK like yourself.
> > > >
> > > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is
> > > on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up
> > > metal box).
> > > >
> > > > I've had 2 issues since then
> > > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I
> > > think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have
> > > replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
> > > diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > > >
> > > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which
> > > connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean
> > > them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I
> > > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > > >
> > > > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound
> > > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which
> > > should be around for some time to come.
> > > >
> > > > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape
> > > :-o ?
> > > >
> > > > cheers Paul M.
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Chris Dale
> > > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike,
> > > >
> > > > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in
> > > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending
> > > on some variables.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this
> > > matters a lot to you.
> > > >
> > > > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the
> > > ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I
> > > believe).
> > > >
> > > > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the
> > > name mini-moog).
> > > >
> > > > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the
> > > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > > >
> > > > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
> > > oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and
> > > (some say better) sound.
> > > >
> > > > Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off
> > > from the electronics.
> > > > Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard
> > > and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it
> > > to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage
> > > everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
> > > electronics.
> > > >
> > > > The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues
> > > back when I got mine.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > > >
> > > > But it is something to be aware of.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or
> > > new oscillator cards.
> > > >
> > > > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> > > Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > > >
> > > > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
> > > /pitch tuning.
> > > > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> > > >
> > > > Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple
> > > parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a
> > > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > > >
> > > > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an
> > > informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Chris
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
> > > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary
> > > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are
> > > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot
> > > even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *
> > *
> > *Gino Wong Birgelo*
> > BSComm, BSEE,
> > ReRED Recording, *Analog Sound Design*
> > *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics*
> >
> > *Ginowong@*<mailto:*Ginowong@*>
> > *
> > *
> >
>





--

Gino Wong Birgelo
BSComm, BSEE,
ReRED Recording, Analog Sound Design
Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics







--

Gino Wong Birgelo
BSComm, BSEE,
ReRED Recording, Analog Sound Design
Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics




Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-20 by Jay Shirley

You're right, Gino.  I need to start working on my list, too.  A different take on the 'bucket list'.

I've got a lot of cool gear.

RnR
js

On Nov 19, 2012, at 9:30 PM, gino wong wrote:

 

Yeah,  I actually have a list. Don't want my stuff to go to those who can't use it or those who don't deserve it.  EWhy burden your family with stuff they often consider , "his shit"





On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 8:41 PM, <lsf5275@aol.com> wrote:
 

If you get one, after you die, can I have it?
 
Frank  (just wondering)
 
In a message dated 11/19/2012 7:39:08 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, wonggster@gmail.com writes:
 

If I may add to the discussion  

For me  a Minimoog is something I need to own before I die, just like the Mellotron underneath it.

gino wong


On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Mark Wallis <markstuartwallis@hotmail.com> wrote:
 


Mike-

  If it's affordable, bite the guy's hand off even if it's not working perfectly. Old Minimoogs are eminently fixable and it doesn't have to cost a fortune. They're only going to get more expensive.

Andy T-

Thank you sir! :-)

Best Whooshes,

MSWx
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
From: tron400@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:33:29 +0000

Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

 
John,

Do you have a Q150 filter in your Dotcom? I don't have a Minimoog to compare it to, but my Q150 does a pretty convincing job of imitating the Moog filters I've heard on recordings. There are also 3rd party filters that some people claim do an even better job than the Q150.

An interesting trick I've found with the Q106 is to put the range selector half-way between the Low and the 32' markings to drop an octave lower than the oscillator is normally capable of.

Bernie

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, John Hammaren <hammaren@...> wrote:
>
> In a general sense, your point is correct (about those keys being overpriced) for 95% of the user population. And the same thing can be said for everything from automobiles to Mellotrons. I have not played the Phatty and have no interest, since I have a Voyager Signature. I do know that no amount to patching on my Dotcom will ever produce the fat sound one can get from the Voyager. Close, but not the same. And Minimoog (classic) aficionados will argue the Voyagers don't match a finely maintained Minimoog. If I didn't own a Mellotron, I would probably buy a 4000D from Markus and be quite happy, but I wouldn't kid myself that this would ever be a real Tron. The last point about the Moog is build quality. Pretty damn good in my opinion. It weighs quite a bit, and has a real steel enclosure. If anyone reads Stereo Review, I ask, would you pay $240,000 for two mono-block amps? Clearly somebody does. (Not I). Happy Thanksgiving.
> John
>
> From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ClayE
> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:25 PM
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
>
>
>
> The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog Voyager Old School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little Phatty slim is $849.00. All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod and pitch wheels. If you don't already have a good controller keyboard, the Little Phatty stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.
>
> Clay
>
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, gino wong <wonggster@<mailto:wonggster@>> wrote:
> >
> > Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> > £ 1250 is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according
> > to quality. If well kept a lot more.
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch <kinchmusic@<mailto:kinchmusic@>> wrote:
> >
> > > **
> > >
> > >
> > > **And can be bought for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> > >
> > > Andy Kinch
> > > kinchmusic@
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ClayE <ecclesreinson@<mailto:ecclesreinson@>>
> > > To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > >
> > >
> > > Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many
> > > good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one.
> > > http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think
> > > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...
> > > The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the
> > > Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> > >
> > > For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> > >
> > > Clay
> > >
> > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, "Paul Marshall" <paulm@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Mike,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am
> > > in the UK like yourself.
> > > >
> > > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is
> > > on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up
> > > metal box).
> > > >
> > > > I've had 2 issues since then
> > > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I
> > > think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have
> > > replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
> > > diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > > >
> > > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which
> > > connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean
> > > them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I
> > > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > > >
> > > > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound
> > > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which
> > > should be around for some time to come.
> > > >
> > > > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape
> > > :-o ?
> > > >
> > > > cheers Paul M.
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Chris Dale
> > > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike,
> > > >
> > > > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in
> > > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending
> > > on some variables.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this
> > > matters a lot to you.
> > > >
> > > > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the
> > > ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I
> > > believe).
> > > >
> > > > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the
> > > name mini-moog).
> > > >
> > > > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the
> > > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > > >
> > > > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
> > > oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and
> > > (some say better) sound.
> > > >
> > > > Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off
> > > from the electronics.
> > > > Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard
> > > and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it
> > > to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage
> > > everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
> > > electronics.
> > > >
> > > > The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues
> > > back when I got mine.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > > >
> > > > But it is something to be aware of.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or
> > > new oscillator cards.
> > > >
> > > > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> > > Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > > >
> > > > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
> > > /pitch tuning.
> > > > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> > > >
> > > > Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple
> > > parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a
> > > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > > >
> > > > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an
> > > informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Chris
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
> > > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary
> > > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are
> > > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot
> > > even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *
> > *
> > *Gino Wong Birgelo*
> > BSComm, BSEE,
> > ReRED Recording, *Analog Sound Design*
> > *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics*
> >
> > *Ginowong@*<mailto:*Ginowong@*>
> > *
> > *
> >
>






--

Gino Wong Birgelo
BSComm, BSEE,
ReRED Recording, Analog Sound Design
Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics










--

Gino Wong Birgelo
BSComm, BSEE,
ReRED Recording, Analog Sound Design
Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics






RE: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-20 by John Hammaren

Okay, I think my Dotcom dyslexia is fixed following my re-read of my previous posts. A senior moment indeed for anyone who actually read and understood the backwards references to Q-dom. In any case (I went and looked – (3) Q-150s, (5)Q107s – they started cropping up used a few years back and I got this idea for a formant filter. A 142 space example of Dotcom addiction that abated finally a few years ago. I actually like the Q107 on its own. The MOTM modules will work quite nicely in the Dotcom with a little gizmo SynthTech sells (actually Bridechamber now sells their stuff now). Nothing more than a regulator on a postage stamp board. Easy peezy, ‘cept for the module widths messing up the screw holes. I totally  agree with you – keep the Dotcom. To be totally candid, my Voyager has been back to the factory twice in its 7 year life – the only two times it has left my house. Not exactly an endorsement of reliability. The Dotcom? A bad keyboard (a dead key). As us Dotcommers all know from others who have had any problems, Roger took care of it – no questions asked. He is one of a kind. I do like the Box-11 – what a great idea. Sorry for off-topic in case some grow bored with this. Hmm, back on topic – this has given me thought to plugging the Tron through the Q150 and EG. Hmm, one last thing – have you seen the 500-series Moog filter announced not long ago? Outrageous price, but I’ll bet it cranks.

 

From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of tron400
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 9:12 PM
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

 

 

John,

If you have more than a few Q150's, your system must be pretty large. I have one Q150, a Q107 and a couple of third party filters in a 55 space system (2 portable cabinets and a Box-11 frame). I've considered replacing the Q107 with another Q150 because I really like the sound, but the Q107 is a different animal. The MOTM needs a different power supply, doesn't it? Since I have no intention of expanding my system, I don't think I want to go that route. I had considered trading the whole thing in on a Voyager, but I like the patching freedom I have.

Bernie

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, John Hammaren <hammaren@...> wrote:
>
> Bernie,
>
> Forgive my seeming confusion. I have no idea how that tangent started. The result of just getting over the flu. In any case, the Q106 is a fine filter, it's just not a Moog, IMHO. I do feel the oscillator Q-150 vs Moog or MOTM does its own part in the fatness equation, since I did run the MOTM through a 106 as well as the Q150 and the MOTM won that contest. So, anyway, in case you wondered what I was smoking - it was just my bad read of your note.
>
> From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of tron400
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 8:33 AM
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
>
>
>
> John,
>
> Do you have a Q150 filter in your Dotcom? I don't have a Minimoog to compare it to, but my Q150 does a pretty convincing job of imitating the Moog filters I've heard on recordings. There are also 3rd party filters that some people claim do an even better job than the Q150.
>
> An interesting trick I've found with the Q106 is to put the range selector half-way between the Low and the 32' markings to drop an octave lower than the oscillator is normally capable of.
>
> Bernie
>
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, John Hammaren <hammaren@<mailto:hammaren@>> wrote:
> >
> > In a general sense, your point is correct (about those keys being overpriced) for 95% of the user population. And the same thing can be said for everything from automobiles to Mellotrons. I have not played the Phatty and have no interest, since I have a Voyager Signature. I do know that no amount to patching on my Dotcom will ever produce the fat sound one can get from the Voyager. Close, but not the same. And Minimoog (classic) aficionados will argue the Voyagers don't match a finely maintained Minimoog. If I didn't own a Mellotron, I would probably buy a 4000D from Markus and be quite happy, but I wouldn't kid myself that this would ever be a real Tron. The last point about the Moog is build quality. Pretty damn good in my opinion. It weighs quite a bit, and has a real steel enclosure. If anyone reads Stereo Review, I ask, would you pay $240,000 for two mono-block amps? Clearly somebody does. (Not I). Happy Thanksgiving.
> > John
> >
> > From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of ClayE
> > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:25 PM
> > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> >
> >
> >
> > The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog Voyager Old School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little Phatty slim is $849.00. All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod and pitch wheels. If you don't already have a good controller keyboard, the Little Phatty stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.
> >
> > Clay
> >
> > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, gino wong <wonggster@<mailto:wonggster@>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> > > £ 1250 is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according
> > > to quality. If well kept a lot more.
> > >
> > > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch <kinchmusic@<mailto:kinchmusic@>> wrote:
> > >
> > > > **
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > **And can be bought for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> > > >
> > > > Andy Kinch
> > > > kinchmusic@
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: ClayE <ecclesreinson@<mailto:ecclesreinson@>>
> > > > To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > > > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many
> > > > good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one.
> > > > http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think
> > > > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...
> > > > The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the
> > > > Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> > > >
> > > > For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> > > >
> > > > Clay
> > > >
> > > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, "Paul Marshall" <paulm@>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Mike,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am
> > > > in the UK like yourself.
> > > > >
> > > > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is
> > > > on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up
> > > > metal box).
> > > > >
> > > > > I've had 2 issues since then
> > > > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I
> > > > think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have
> > > > replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
> > > > diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which
> > > > connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean
> > > > them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I
> > > > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > > > >
> > > > > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound
> > > > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which
> > > > should be around for some time to come.
> > > > >
> > > > > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape
> > > > :-o ?
> > > > >
> > > > > cheers Paul M.
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: Chris Dale
> > > > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Mike,
> > > > >
> > > > > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in
> > > > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending
> > > > on some variables.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this
> > > > matters a lot to you.
> > > > >
> > > > > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the
> > > > ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I
> > > > believe).
> > > > >
> > > > > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the
> > > > name mini-moog).
> > > > >
> > > > > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the
> > > > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > > > >
> > > > > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
> > > > oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and
> > > > (some say better) sound.
> > > > >
> > > > > Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off
> > > > from the electronics.
> > > > > Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard
> > > > and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it
> > > > to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage
> > > > everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
> > > > electronics.
> > > > >
> > > > > The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues
> > > > back when I got mine.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > > > >
> > > > > But it is something to be aware of.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or
> > > > new oscillator cards.
> > > > >
> > > > > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> > > > Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > > > >
> > > > > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
> > > > /pitch tuning.
> > > > > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> > > > >
> > > > > Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple
> > > > parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a
> > > > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > > > >
> > > > > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an
> > > > informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Chris
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
> > > > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary
> > > > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > > > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are
> > > > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot
> > > > even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Mike
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > > >
> > > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > > >
> > > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *Gino Wong Birgelo*
> > > BSComm, BSEE,
> > > ReRED Recording, *Analog Sound Design*
> > > *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics*
> > >
> > > *Ginowong@*<mailto:*Ginowong@*>
> > > *
> > > *
> > >
> >
>

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-20 by Mike Dickson

On 20 November 2012 01:11, gino wong <wonggster@gmail.com> wrote:
 

I was going to run down this whole long list of Moog stuff I got recently for the same money but if somebody had dangled a life list item in front of me, discussion would have ensued.


Aside from the Minimoog do you have any other items on your bucket list Mike ?


I had to Google 'bucket list' to be sure what you meant.  :-)

I don't really - at least nothing I'd say the innocent to get to.  A decent Hammond might be okay, but I'm not in any great hurry for it.  the minimoog just came up unexpectedly.  

Mike

Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-20 by tron400

I would get lost in a 142 space modular. My modular knowledge pales in comparison to others on the Yahoo Dotcom forum. Wish I could grasp what they're talking about most of the time. If it was in musical terms instead of technical terms, I might have a chance.

My Dotcom was up to 88 spaces at one time and for me, it was unmanageable. It eventually went down to 22 spaces so I could give my stepdaughter some money for college, but has recently grown a little. I've had to go with some 3rd party modules just to fit the space I have. For instance, a STG Signal Amp is taking the place of 3 Q108's.

The Moog 500 series is really tempting, but I can't justify spending 3 or 4 times what it costs for any other brand. I'm sure they're really nice, but they are taking advantage of the Moog name to jack up the prices.

Bernie

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, John Hammaren <hammaren@...> wrote:
>
> Okay, I think my Dotcom dyslexia is fixed following my re-read of my previous posts. A senior moment indeed for anyone who actually read and understood the backwards references to Q-dom. In any case (I went and looked - (3) Q-150s, (5)Q107s - they started cropping up used a few years back and I got this idea for a formant filter. A 142 space example of Dotcom addiction that abated finally a few years ago. I actually like the Q107 on its own. The MOTM modules will work quite nicely in the Dotcom with a little gizmo SynthTech sells (actually Bridechamber now sells their stuff now). Nothing more than a regulator on a postage stamp board. Easy peezy, 'cept for the module widths messing up the screw holes. I totally agree with you - keep the Dotcom. To be totally candid, my Voyager has been back to the factory twice in its 7 year life - the only two times it has left my house. Not exactly an endorsement of reliability. The Dotcom? A bad keyboard (a dead key). As us Dotcommers all know from others who have had any problems, Roger took care of it - no questions asked. He is one of a kind. I do like the Box-11 - what a great idea. Sorry for off-topic in case some grow bored with this. Hmm, back on topic - this has given me thought to plugging the Tron through the Q150 and EG. Hmm, one last thing - have you seen the 500-series Moog filter announced not long ago? Outrageous price, but I'll bet it cranks.
>
> From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of tron400
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 9:12 PM
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
>
>
>
> John,
>
> If you have more than a few Q150's, your system must be pretty large. I have one Q150, a Q107 and a couple of third party filters in a 55 space system (2 portable cabinets and a Box-11 frame). I've considered replacing the Q107 with another Q150 because I really like the sound, but the Q107 is a different animal. The MOTM needs a different power supply, doesn't it? Since I have no intention of expanding my system, I don't think I want to go that route. I had considered trading the whole thing in on a Voyager, but I like the patching freedom I have.
>
> Bernie
>
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, John Hammaren <hammaren@<mailto:hammaren@>> wrote:
> >
> > Bernie,
> >
> > Forgive my seeming confusion. I have no idea how that tangent started. The result of just getting over the flu. In any case, the Q106 is a fine filter, it's just not a Moog, IMHO. I do feel the oscillator Q-150 vs Moog or MOTM does its own part in the fatness equation, since I did run the MOTM through a 106 as well as the Q150 and the MOTM won that contest. So, anyway, in case you wondered what I was smoking - it was just my bad read of your note.
> >
> > From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of tron400
> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 8:33 AM
> > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> >
> >
> >
> > John,
> >
> > Do you have a Q150 filter in your Dotcom? I don't have a Minimoog to compare it to, but my Q150 does a pretty convincing job of imitating the Moog filters I've heard on recordings. There are also 3rd party filters that some people claim do an even better job than the Q150.
> >
> > An interesting trick I've found with the Q106 is to put the range selector half-way between the Low and the 32' markings to drop an octave lower than the oscillator is normally capable of.
> >
> > Bernie
> >
> > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, John Hammaren <hammaren@<mailto:hammaren@>> wrote:
> > >
> > > In a general sense, your point is correct (about those keys being overpriced) for 95% of the user population. And the same thing can be said for everything from automobiles to Mellotrons. I have not played the Phatty and have no interest, since I have a Voyager Signature. I do know that no amount to patching on my Dotcom will ever produce the fat sound one can get from the Voyager. Close, but not the same. And Minimoog (classic) aficionados will argue the Voyagers don't match a finely maintained Minimoog. If I didn't own a Mellotron, I would probably buy a 4000D from Markus and be quite happy, but I wouldn't kid myself that this would ever be a real Tron. The last point about the Moog is build quality. Pretty damn good in my opinion. It weighs quite a bit, and has a real steel enclosure. If anyone reads Stereo Review, I ask, would you pay $240,000 for two mono-block amps? Clearly somebody does. (Not I). Happy Thanksgiving.
> > > John
> > >
> > > From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of ClayE
> > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:25 PM
> > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog Voyager Old School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little Phatty slim is $849.00. All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod and pitch wheels. If you don't already have a good controller keyboard, the Little Phatty stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.
> > >
> > > Clay
> > >
> > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, gino wong <wonggster@<mailto:wonggster@>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> > > > £ 1250 is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according
> > > > to quality. If well kept a lot more.
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch <kinchmusic@<mailto:kinchmusic@>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > **
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > **And can be bought for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> > > > >
> > > > > Andy Kinch
> > > > > kinchmusic@
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: ClayE <ecclesreinson@<mailto:ecclesreinson@>>
> > > > > To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > > > > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > > > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many
> > > > > good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one.
> > > > > http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think
> > > > > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...
> > > > > The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the
> > > > > Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> > > > >
> > > > > For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> > > > >
> > > > > Clay
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, "Paul Marshall" <paulm@>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Mike,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am
> > > > > in the UK like yourself.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is
> > > > > on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up
> > > > > metal box).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've had 2 issues since then
> > > > > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I
> > > > > think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have
> > > > > replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
> > > > > diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which
> > > > > connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean
> > > > > them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I
> > > > > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound
> > > > > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which
> > > > > should be around for some time to come.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape
> > > > > :-o ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > cheers Paul M.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > From: Chris Dale
> > > > > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mike,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in
> > > > > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending
> > > > > on some variables.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this
> > > > > matters a lot to you.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the
> > > > > ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I
> > > > > believe).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the
> > > > > name mini-moog).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the
> > > > > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
> > > > > oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and
> > > > > (some say better) sound.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off
> > > > > from the electronics.
> > > > > > Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard
> > > > > and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it
> > > > > to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage
> > > > > everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
> > > > > electronics.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues
> > > > > back when I got mine.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But it is something to be aware of.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or
> > > > > new oscillator cards.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> > > > > Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
> > > > > /pitch tuning.
> > > > > > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple
> > > > > parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a
> > > > > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an
> > > > > informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Chris
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
> > > > > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary
> > > > > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > > > > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are
> > > > > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot
> > > > > even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mike
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > *
> > > > *
> > > > *Gino Wong Birgelo*
> > > > BSComm, BSEE,
> > > > ReRED Recording, *Analog Sound Design*
> > > > *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics*
> > > >
> > > > *Ginowong@*<mailto:*Ginowong@*>
> > > > *
> > > > *
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-20 by fdoddy@aol.com

Yes you do Gino!  For me, the thing about the Mini is not the low end, but the detail and energy in the low  mids.  I love building similar patches on a Mini and either another analog or modeled synth and demonstarting this to my music friends who think the Mini is all about the low end.  There are synths that are certainly stronger  at the bottom, my Phil Cirocco hot-rodded 2600 for one, but there's something about that low mid snarl that makes it....for me.


and yes, it does look pretty on top of my Streetly tron. It does have some scratchy pots and a selector switch that should be replaced, but other than that, it has been playing great for me for at least 12 years now.  I use a MIDI -CV converter as the keyboard is worthless.


fritz



-----Original Message-----
From: gino wong <wonggster@gmail.com>
To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Mon, Nov 19, 2012 7:39 pm
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

 
If I may add to the discussion  

For me  a Minimoog is something I need to own before I die, just like the Mellotron underneath it.

gino wong


On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Mark Wallis <markstuartwallis@hotmail.com> wrote:
 

Mike-

  If it's affordable, bite the guy's hand off even if it's not working perfectly. Old Minimoogs are eminently fixable and it doesn't have to cost a fortune. They're only going to get more expensive.

Andy T-

Thank you sir! :-)

Best Whooshes,

MSWx
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
From: tron400@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:33:29 +0000

Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

 
John,

Do you have a Q150 filter in your Dotcom? I don't have a Minimoog to compare it to, but my Q150 does a pretty convincing job of imitating the Moog filters I've heard on recordings. There are also 3rd party filters that some people claim do an even better job than the Q150.

An interesting trick I've found with the Q106 is to put the range selector half-way between the Low and the 32' markings to drop an octave lower than the oscillator is normally capable of.

Bernie

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, John Hammaren <hammaren@...> wrote:
>
> In a general sense, your point is correct (about those keys being overpriced) for 95% of the user population. And the same thing can be said for everything from automobiles to Mellotrons. I have not played the Phatty and have no interest, since I have a Voyager Signature. I do know that no amount to patching on my Dotcom will ever produce the fat sound one can get from the Voyager. Close, but not the same. And Minimoog (classic) aficionados will argue the Voyagers don't match a finely maintained Minimoog. If I didn't own a Mellotron, I would probably buy a 4000D from Markus and be quite happy, but I wouldn't kid myself that this would ever be a real Tron. The last point about the Moog is build quality. Pretty damn good in my opinion. It weighs quite a bit, and has a real steel enclosure. If anyone reads Stereo Review, I ask, would you pay $240,000 for two mono-block amps? Clearly somebody does. (Not I). Happy Thanksgiving.
> John
>
> From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ClayE
> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:25 PM
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
>
>
>
> The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog Voyager Old School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little Phatty slim is $849.00. All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod and pitch wheels. If you don't already have a good controller keyboard, the Little Phatty stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.
>
> Clay
>
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, gino wong <wonggster@<mailto:wonggster@>> wrote:
> >
> > Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> > £ 1250 is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according
> > to quality. If well kept a lot more.
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch <kinchmusic@<mailto:kinchmusic@>> wrote:
> >
> > > **
> > >
> > >
> > > **And can be bought for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> > >
> > > Andy Kinch
> > > kinchmusic@
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ClayE <ecclesreinson@<mailto:ecclesreinson@>>
> > > To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > >
> > >
> > > Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many
> > > good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one.
> > > http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think
> > > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...
> > > The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the
> > > Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> > >
> > > For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> > >
> > > Clay
> > >
> > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, "Paul Marshall" <paulm@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Mike,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am
> > > in the UK like yourself.
> > > >
> > > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is
> > > on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up
> > > metal box).
> > > >
> > > > I've had 2 issues since then
> > > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I
> > > think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have
> > > replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
> > > diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > > >
> > > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which
> > > connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean
> > > them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I
> > > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > > >
> > > > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound
> > > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which
> > > should be around for some time to come.
> > > >
> > > > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape
> > > :-o ?
> > > >
> > > > cheers Paul M.
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Chris Dale
> > > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike,
> > > >
> > > > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in
> > > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending
> > > on some variables.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this
> > > matters a lot to you.
> > > >
> > > > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the
> > > ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I
> > > believe).
> > > >
> > > > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the
> > > name mini-moog).
> > > >
> > > > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the
> > > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > > >
> > > > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
> > > oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and
> > > (some say better) sound.
> > > >
> > > > Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off
> > > from the electronics.
> > > > Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard
> > > and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it
> > > to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage
> > > everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
> > > electronics.
> > > >
> > > > The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues
> > > back when I got mine.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > > >
> > > > But it is something to be aware of.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or
> > > new oscillator cards.
> > > >
> > > > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> > > Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > > >
> > > > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
> > > /pitch tuning.
> > > > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> > > >
> > > > Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple
> > > parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a
> > > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > > >
> > > > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an
> > > informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Chris
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
> > > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary
> > > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are
> > > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot
> > > even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *
> > *
> > *Gino Wong Birgelo*
> > BSComm, BSEE,
> > ReRED Recording, *Analog Sound Design*
> > *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics*
> >
> > *Ginowong@*<mailto:*Ginowong@*>;
> > *
> > *
> >
>





--

Gino Wong Birgelo
BSComm, BSEE,
ReRED Recording, Analog Sound Design
Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics




RE: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-20 by John Hammaren

Bernie ,

And so do I get lost. Never enough cables. As I said, addiction, although it was something I’ve thought about since I was a young’un and first listened to Carlos. And I must say for me it defies the old adage ‘wanting is better than having’. I know it sounds perhaps trite, but I can stare at the thing with the sequencers rolling for hours. Still satisfying even after 7 years of owning the original 66. BTW, Will does good stuff from STG, and I have a few things, including the Mankato. I know he appears to be a PITA to some in the Dotcom world – another reason to like him. In lieu of the 500 series, the Fooger Lowpass might be interesting and low cost enough to consider breaking out the soldering iron.

John

 

From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of tron400
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 8:25 AM
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

 

 

I would get lost in a 142 space modular. My modular knowledge pales in comparison to others on the Yahoo Dotcom forum. Wish I could grasp what they're talking about most of the time. If it was in musical terms instead of technical terms, I might have a chance.

My Dotcom was up to 88 spaces at one time and for me, it was unmanageable. It eventually went down to 22 spaces so I could give my stepdaughter some money for college, but has recently grown a little. I've had to go with some 3rd party modules just to fit the space I have. For instance, a STG Signal Amp is taking the place of 3 Q108's.

The Moog 500 series is really tempting, but I can't justify spending 3 or 4 times what it costs for any other brand. I'm sure they're really nice, but they are taking advantage of the Moog name to jack up the prices.

Bernie

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, John Hammaren <hammaren@...> wrote:
>
> Okay, I think my Dotcom dyslexia is fixed following my re-read of my previous posts. A senior moment indeed for anyone who actually read and understood the backwards references to Q-dom. In any case (I went and looked - (3) Q-150s, (5)Q107s - they started cropping up used a few years back and I got this idea for a formant filter. A 142 space example of Dotcom addiction that abated finally a few years ago. I actually like the Q107 on its own. The MOTM modules will work quite nicely in the Dotcom with a little gizmo SynthTech sells (actually Bridechamber now sells their stuff now). Nothing more than a regulator on a postage stamp board. Easy peezy, 'cept for the module widths messing up the screw holes. I totally agree with you - keep the Dotcom. To be totally candid, my Voyager has been back to the factory twice in its 7 year life - the only two times it has left my house. Not exactly an endorsement of reliability. The Dotcom? A bad keyboard (a dead key). As us Dotcommers all know from others who have had any problems, Roger took care of it - no questions asked. He is one of a kind. I do like the Box-11 - what a great idea. Sorry for off-topic in case some grow bored with this. Hmm, back on topic - this has given me thought to plugging the Tron through the Q150 and EG. Hmm, one last thing - have you seen the 500-series Moog filter announced not long ago? Outrageous price, but I'll bet it cranks.
>
> From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of tron400
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 9:12 PM
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
>
>
>
> John,
>
> If you have more than a few Q150's, your system must be pretty large. I have one Q150, a Q107 and a couple of third party filters in a 55 space system (2 portable cabinets and a Box-11 frame). I've considered replacing the Q107 with another Q150 because I really like the sound, but the Q107 is a different animal. The MOTM needs a different power supply, doesn't it? Since I have no intention of expanding my system, I don't think I want to go that route. I had considered trading the whole thing in on a Voyager, but I like the patching freedom I have.
>
> Bernie
>
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, John Hammaren <hammaren@<mailto:hammaren@>> wrote:
> >
> > Bernie,
> >
> > Forgive my seeming confusion. I have no idea how that tangent started. The result of just getting over the flu. In any case, the Q106 is a fine filter, it's just not a Moog, IMHO. I do feel the oscillator Q-150 vs Moog or MOTM does its own part in the fatness equation, since I did run the MOTM through a 106 as well as the Q150 and the MOTM won that contest. So, anyway, in case you wondered what I was smoking - it was just my bad read of your note.
> >
> > From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of tron400
> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 8:33 AM
> > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> >
> >
> >
> > John,
> >
> > Do you have a Q150 filter in your Dotcom? I don't have a Minimoog to compare it to, but my Q150 does a pretty convincing job of imitating the Moog filters I've heard on recordings. There are also 3rd party filters that some people claim do an even better job than the Q150.
> >
> > An interesting trick I've found with the Q106 is to put the range selector half-way between the Low and the 32' markings to drop an octave lower than the oscillator is normally capable of.
> >
> > Bernie
> >
> > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, John Hammaren <hammaren@<mailto:hammaren@>> wrote:
> > >
> > > In a general sense, your point is correct (about those keys being overpriced) for 95% of the user population. And the same thing can be said for everything from automobiles to Mellotrons. I have not played the Phatty and have no interest, since I have a Voyager Signature. I do know that no amount to patching on my Dotcom will ever produce the fat sound one can get from the Voyager. Close, but not the same. And Minimoog (classic) aficionados will argue the Voyagers don't match a finely maintained Minimoog. If I didn't own a Mellotron, I would probably buy a 4000D from Markus and be quite happy, but I wouldn't kid myself that this would ever be a real Tron. The last point about the Moog is build quality. Pretty damn good in my opinion. It weighs quite a bit, and has a real steel enclosure. If anyone reads Stereo Review, I ask, would you pay $240,000 for two mono-block amps? Clearly somebody does. (Not I). Happy Thanksgiving.
> > > John
> > >
> > > From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of ClayE
> > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:25 PM
> > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog Voyager Old School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little Phatty slim is $849.00. All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod and pitch wheels. If you don't already have a good controller keyboard, the Little Phatty stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.
> > >
> > > Clay
> > >
> > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, gino wong <wonggster@<mailto:wonggster@>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> > > > £ 1250 is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according
> > > > to quality. If well kept a lot more.
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch <kinchmusic@<mailto:kinchmusic@>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > **
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > **And can be bought for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> > > > >
> > > > > Andy Kinch
> > > > > kinchmusic@
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: ClayE <ecclesreinson@<mailto:ecclesreinson@>>
> > > > > To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > > > > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > > > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many
> > > > > good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one.
> > > > > http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think
> > > > > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...
> > > > > The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the
> > > > > Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> > > > >
> > > > > For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> > > > >
> > > > > Clay
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, "Paul Marshall" <paulm@>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Mike,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am
> > > > > in the UK like yourself.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is
> > > > > on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up
> > > > > metal box).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've had 2 issues since then
> > > > > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I
> > > > > think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have
> > > > > replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
> > > > > diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which
> > > > > connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean
> > > > > them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I
> > > > > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound
> > > > > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which
> > > > > should be around for some time to come.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape
> > > > > :-o ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > cheers Paul M.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > From: Chris Dale
> > > > > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mike,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in
> > > > > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending
> > > > > on some variables.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this
> > > > > matters a lot to you.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the
> > > > > ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I
> > > > > believe).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the
> > > > > name mini-moog).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the
> > > > > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
> > > > > oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and
> > > > > (some say better) sound.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off
> > > > > from the electronics.
> > > > > > Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard
> > > > > and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it
> > > > > to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage
> > > > > everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
> > > > > electronics.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues
> > > > > back when I got mine.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But it is something to be aware of.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or
> > > > > new oscillator cards.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> > > > > Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
> > > > > /pitch tuning.
> > > > > > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple
> > > > > parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a
> > > > > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an
> > > > > informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Chris
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
> > > > > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary
> > > > > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > > > > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are
> > > > > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot
> > > > > even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mike
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > *
> > > > *
> > > > *Gino Wong Birgelo*
> > > > BSComm, BSEE,
> > > > ReRED Recording, *Analog Sound Design*
> > > > *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics*
> > > >
> > > > *Ginowong@*<mailto:*Ginowong@*>
> > > > *
> > > > *
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-21 by tron400

John,

I've started making some of my own cables in odd lengths because sometimes a two footer is too long or too short, so now I have some 1.5 footers (white heat-shrink) and some 2.5 footers (black heat-shrink).

At one time, I had a Q960 (with helper modules), a Q119 and the STG Time Modules (which I really miss). Now I only have a Q960 with 2 Q962's and 2 Q963's. If Will ever finishes the new Time Modules, I may replace my Q960; less space and more functionality.

I'm not much for DIY, but if someone could put a Fooger behind a Dotcom panel, I would definitely be interested :-)

Bernie

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, John Hammaren <hammaren@...> wrote:
>
> Bernie ,
> And so do I get lost. Never enough cables. As I said, addiction, although it was something I've thought about since I was a young'un and first listened to Carlos. And I must say for me it defies the old adage 'wanting is better than having'. I know it sounds perhaps trite, but I can stare at the thing with the sequencers rolling for hours. Still satisfying even after 7 years of owning the original 66. BTW, Will does good stuff from STG, and I have a few things, including the Mankato. I know he appears to be a PITA to some in the Dotcom world - another reason to like him. In lieu of the 500 series, the Fooger Lowpass might be interesting and low cost enough to consider breaking out the soldering iron.
> John
>
> From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of tron400
> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 8:25 AM
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
>
>
>
> I would get lost in a 142 space modular. My modular knowledge pales in comparison to others on the Yahoo Dotcom forum. Wish I could grasp what they're talking about most of the time. If it was in musical terms instead of technical terms, I might have a chance.
>
> My Dotcom was up to 88 spaces at one time and for me, it was unmanageable. It eventually went down to 22 spaces so I could give my stepdaughter some money for college, but has recently grown a little. I've had to go with some 3rd party modules just to fit the space I have. For instance, a STG Signal Amp is taking the place of 3 Q108's.
>
> The Moog 500 series is really tempting, but I can't justify spending 3 or 4 times what it costs for any other brand. I'm sure they're really nice, but they are taking advantage of the Moog name to jack up the prices.
>
> Bernie
>
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, John Hammaren <hammaren@<mailto:hammaren@>> wrote:
> >
> > Okay, I think my Dotcom dyslexia is fixed following my re-read of my previous posts. A senior moment indeed for anyone who actually read and understood the backwards references to Q-dom. In any case (I went and looked - (3) Q-150s, (5)Q107s - they started cropping up used a few years back and I got this idea for a formant filter. A 142 space example of Dotcom addiction that abated finally a few years ago. I actually like the Q107 on its own. The MOTM modules will work quite nicely in the Dotcom with a little gizmo SynthTech sells (actually Bridechamber now sells their stuff now). Nothing more than a regulator on a postage stamp board. Easy peezy, 'cept for the module widths messing up the screw holes. I totally agree with you - keep the Dotcom. To be totally candid, my Voyager has been back to the factory twice in its 7 year life - the only two times it has left my house. Not exactly an endorsement of reliability. The Dotcom? A bad keyboard (a dead key). As us Dotcommers all know from others who have had any problems, Roger took care of it - no questions asked. He is one of a kind. I do like the Box-11 - what a great idea. Sorry for off-topic in case some grow bored with this. Hmm, back on topic - this has given me thought to plugging the Tron through the Q150 and EG. Hmm, one last thing - have you seen the 500-series Moog filter announced not long ago? Outrageous price, but I'll bet it cranks.
> >
> > From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of tron400
> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 9:12 PM
> > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> >
> >
> >
> > John,
> >
> > If you have more than a few Q150's, your system must be pretty large. I have one Q150, a Q107 and a couple of third party filters in a 55 space system (2 portable cabinets and a Box-11 frame). I've considered replacing the Q107 with another Q150 because I really like the sound, but the Q107 is a different animal. The MOTM needs a different power supply, doesn't it? Since I have no intention of expanding my system, I don't think I want to go that route. I had considered trading the whole thing in on a Voyager, but I like the patching freedom I have.
> >
> > Bernie
> >
> > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, John Hammaren <hammaren@<mailto:hammaren@>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Bernie,
> > >
> > > Forgive my seeming confusion. I have no idea how that tangent started. The result of just getting over the flu. In any case, the Q106 is a fine filter, it's just not a Moog, IMHO. I do feel the oscillator Q-150 vs Moog or MOTM does its own part in the fatness equation, since I did run the MOTM through a 106 as well as the Q150 and the MOTM won that contest. So, anyway, in case you wondered what I was smoking - it was just my bad read of your note.
> > >
> > > From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of tron400
> > > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 8:33 AM
> > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > John,
> > >
> > > Do you have a Q150 filter in your Dotcom? I don't have a Minimoog to compare it to, but my Q150 does a pretty convincing job of imitating the Moog filters I've heard on recordings. There are also 3rd party filters that some people claim do an even better job than the Q150.
> > >
> > > An interesting trick I've found with the Q106 is to put the range selector half-way between the Low and the 32' markings to drop an octave lower than the oscillator is normally capable of.
> > >
> > > Bernie
> > >
> > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, John Hammaren <hammaren@<mailto:hammaren@>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > In a general sense, your point is correct (about those keys being overpriced) for 95% of the user population. And the same thing can be said for everything from automobiles to Mellotrons. I have not played the Phatty and have no interest, since I have a Voyager Signature. I do know that no amount to patching on my Dotcom will ever produce the fat sound one can get from the Voyager. Close, but not the same. And Minimoog (classic) aficionados will argue the Voyagers don't match a finely maintained Minimoog. If I didn't own a Mellotron, I would probably buy a 4000D from Markus and be quite happy, but I wouldn't kid myself that this would ever be a real Tron. The last point about the Moog is build quality. Pretty damn good in my opinion. It weighs quite a bit, and has a real steel enclosure. If anyone reads Stereo Review, I ask, would you pay $240,000 for two mono-block amps? Clearly somebody does. (Not I). Happy Thanksgiving.
> > > > John
> > > >
> > > > From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of ClayE
> > > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:25 PM
> > > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog Voyager Old School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little Phatty slim is $849.00. All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod and pitch wheels. If you don't already have a good controller keyboard, the Little Phatty stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.
> > > >
> > > > Clay
> > > >
> > > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, gino wong <wonggster@<mailto:wonggster@>> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> > > > > £ 1250 is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according
> > > > > to quality. If well kept a lot more.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch <kinchmusic@<mailto:kinchmusic@>> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > **
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > **And can be bought for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Andy Kinch
> > > > > > kinchmusic@
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: ClayE <ecclesreinson@<mailto:ecclesreinson@>>
> > > > > > To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > > > > > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > > > > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many
> > > > > > good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one.
> > > > > > http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think
> > > > > > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...
> > > > > > The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the
> > > > > > Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Clay
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, "Paul Marshall" <paulm@>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Mike,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am
> > > > > > in the UK like yourself.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is
> > > > > > on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up
> > > > > > metal box).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I've had 2 issues since then
> > > > > > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I
> > > > > > think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have
> > > > > > replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
> > > > > > diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which
> > > > > > connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean
> > > > > > them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I
> > > > > > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound
> > > > > > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which
> > > > > > should be around for some time to come.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape
> > > > > > :-o ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > cheers Paul M.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > From: Chris Dale
> > > > > > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Mike,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in
> > > > > > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending
> > > > > > on some variables.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this
> > > > > > matters a lot to you.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the
> > > > > > ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I
> > > > > > believe).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the
> > > > > > name mini-moog).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the
> > > > > > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
> > > > > > oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and
> > > > > > (some say better) sound.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off
> > > > > > from the electronics.
> > > > > > > Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard
> > > > > > and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it
> > > > > > to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage
> > > > > > everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
> > > > > > electronics.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues
> > > > > > back when I got mine.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But it is something to be aware of.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or
> > > > > > new oscillator cards.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> > > > > > Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
> > > > > > /pitch tuning.
> > > > > > > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple
> > > > > > parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a
> > > > > > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an
> > > > > > informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Chris
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
> > > > > > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary
> > > > > > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > > > > > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are
> > > > > > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot
> > > > > > even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Mike
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > > > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > > > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > *
> > > > > *
> > > > > *Gino Wong Birgelo*
> > > > > BSComm, BSEE,
> > > > > ReRED Recording, *Analog Sound Design*
> > > > > *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics*
> > > > >
> > > > > *Ginowong@*<mailto:*Ginowong@*>
> > > > > *
> > > > > *
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>