The Mellotron Group group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

The Mellotron Group

Archive for newmellotrongroup.v1.

Index last updated: 2026-03-30 01:16 UTC

Thread

Delay explained

Delay explained

2008-01-28 by ceccles_ca

You may have noticed a delay in the arrival of messages. Some
messages get routed to a Yahoo spam folder. For some unknown reason,
emails go there occasionally. I have to approve or reject the stuff
in the spam folder. That's the reason for the delay. Posts from
Mattias and Martin often end up in the spam folder.

Should I shut off the spam filter? We haven't had any real spam.

Clay

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Delay explained

2008-01-28 by lsf5275@aol.com

In a message dated 1/28/2008 8:02:27 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, ecclesreinson@rogers.com writes:
That's the reason for the delay. Posts from
Mattias and Martin often end up in the spam folder.
 
And properly so...



Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape in the new year.

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Delay explained

2008-01-28 by Mike Dickson

Not if it keeps Martin and Mattias out.

Mike (not spam)

ceccles_ca wrote:
>
> You may have noticed a delay in the arrival of messages. Some
> messages get routed to a Yahoo spam folder. For some unknown reason,
> emails go there occasionally. I have to approve or reject the stuff
> in the spam folder. That's the reason for the delay. Posts from
> Mattias and Martin often end up in the spam folder.
>
> Should I shut off the spam filter? We haven't had any real spam.
>
> Clay
>
>

--
Mike Dickson, Edinburgh

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Delay explained

2008-01-28 by jeffc@netaxs.com

On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, ceccles_ca wrote:

> You may have noticed a delay in the arrival of messages. Some
> messages get routed to a Yahoo spam folder. For some unknown reason,
> emails go there occasionally. I have to approve or reject the stuff
> in the spam folder. That's the reason for the delay. Posts from
> Mattias and Martin often end up in the spam folder.


i wonder if this is happening due to links being in their 'sigs'?
[which would be a likely spam characteristic...]

there should be a way for you to 'whitelist' or approve them as
senders once and for all, but 'should' is the keyword...


> Should I shut off the spam filter? We haven't had any real spam.


we will, i can assure you.
the 'group' is probably just too new to be noticed, but the clock ticks
on... and it will happen...


> Clay


...jeff

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Delay explained

2008-01-28 by Rick Blechta


On Jan 28, 2008, at 8:02 AM, ceccles_ca wrote:

We haven't had any real spam.

Do you mean all we can afford at this point is fake spam??