The Mellotron Group group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

The Mellotron Group

Index last updated: 2026-04-03 22:19 UTC

Message

Re: New Digital Mellotron

2010-08-07 by Sean

It seems I can never overcome my chronic bouts of lurking. Let'se if this time is any different!

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, tronbros <tronbros@...> wrote:
>
> Because he didn't like the MKII preamplifier - it's aggressive - but KC loved it!
> 
> M
> 
> mellotronics.co.uk

Any specifics? Does the stock preamp have a telltale response curve? Pinder's a different? Or does it introduce a measure of compression, or distortion?

I'm trying to tease out what info I can to make the most of the M-Tron samples I've got. I'd like to nail both the Crimson sound and the Moodies sound, and switch between the two as I want.
 
> 
> On 25 Jul 2010, at 17:11, djacques@... wrote:
> 
> > True. But were they "satisfied" with what was provided with the production tapes? If so, why so much processing, double tracking, and reverb? Why did Pinder change to a solid state preamp to get a mellower sound (the Moody sound)?
>

Curious. I've been having problems getting some truly fat MkII brass. I can get it with a big bottom, but it's a mud monster no matter what I've tried EQ wise so far. I can get it clear, but anorexically thin. Again, M-Tron samples, and they'll have to make do.

Also, anyone attempt to make a software edit for the VST version of the original M-Tron? I'm looking for a half-speed switch. Should be an easy matter of a functional button that halves the replay sample rate. I've just no programming skills.

Much thanks.
Sean

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.