After a little further reflection, it strikes me that perhaps the whole
topic of conversation would more correctly be thought of "beloved keyboards
vs. hated keyboards" rather than "good keyboards vs. bad keyboards." That
would clarify the subjective nature of the conversation and define it as
opinion rather than empiricism. It's Frank's fault.
topic of conversation would more correctly be thought of "beloved keyboards
vs. hated keyboards" rather than "good keyboards vs. bad keyboards." That
would clarify the subjective nature of the conversation and define it as
opinion rather than empiricism. It's Frank's fault.
> Point taken, I was tired.