To hell with it, I'm not going to take on all three of you..... john ceccles_ca wrote: > > I'm with Fritz and Mike on this one..... > > Clay > > > I'm with Mike on this one..... > > > > fritz > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@...> > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com> > > Sent: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:05 pm > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Mellotrons Live vs Studio > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The reason why Mellotron samples don't (usually) sound like a Mellotron > > > > is because people making the samples come up with their own judgements > > > > regarding eq, volume, pitching and the rest of it that makes it veer > > > > well away from the original sound. Some samplers interpolate the sounds > > > > (only recording every third note or so) whereas others take sounds they > > > > feel are 'ugly' (like the top D or second F on the flute) and > replace it > > > > with the note below it pitched up by a semi tone. > > > > > > > > I /have/ sampled my Mellotron strings, choir and brass faithfully > > > > without making any adjustments whatsoever and I would happily defy > > > > anyone to tell the real instrument from the samples. My problem is not > > > > with the samples, it's with the samplers. > > > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > Jon wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I would imagine that the multiple overdubs that the studio albums > have > > > > > really dilute the raw sound of the live instrument, as do > > > > > the musical sensibilities of the producer. Hearing that > > > > > realtime audio of tape moving across heads and passing through amps > > > > > and speakers has an immediacy that doesn't seem to translate to > > > > > recording. That's why Mellotron samples don't sound like a > > > > > Mellotron. They sound like samples of a Mellotron. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > *From:* Mark Pring <mailto:markpringnz@...> > > > > > *To:* newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com> > > > > > <mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>> > > > > > *Sent:* Thursday, February 05, 2009 12:53 AM > > > > > *Subject:* [newmellotrongroup] Mellotrons Live vs Studio > > > > > > > > > > Just listening to some live Moody Blues track on Last FM, well > > > > > actually Melancholy Man. Just got me thinking of the difference > > > > > between the live and studio sound of the mellotron. I much prefer > > > > > the live sound, not knowing much about recording, what do they do > > > > > them in the recording studio to take most of the life out of them? > > > > > > > > > > Mark >
Message
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Mellotrons Live vs Studio
2009-02-05 by john barrick
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.
