That's a good argument, but you don't see DX7 piano on a basic Nord
Lead sound set. Or look at the Electro series, Expensive, high end pro
oriented gear built wih Roms with the original sounds. Crappy is
relative: Rhodes have heavy action, Vakos have no action, clavs break
strings, electrolytics fail often in Arps. Great is relative: Do
people still want, nay, crave the sound 10, 20 years later.
I used to have this discussion with keyboard players a lot around the
time of the DX7.
gw
Lead sound set. Or look at the Electro series, Expensive, high end pro
oriented gear built wih Roms with the original sounds. Crappy is
relative: Rhodes have heavy action, Vakos have no action, clavs break
strings, electrolytics fail often in Arps. Great is relative: Do
people still want, nay, crave the sound 10, 20 years later.
I used to have this discussion with keyboard players a lot around the
time of the DX7.
gw
On 12/2/07, mellotronist <mellotronist@cox.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> A lot of crappy keyboards have served many artists very well. It's because
> even though they were crappy keyboards, they were the only ones they had to
> use and they had to make them work for them. I'd be quite willing to bet
> that most of the artists who used them bitched about how crappy they were
> while they were using them, and wished that there was something less crappy
> available. Just because some great music managed to be created using them
> doesn't make them any less crappy.
>
> >I thought those Hohner keyboards (Pianet, Clavinet) were some of the
> > best ever. They had service issues but they had that expressive
> > potential that some truly bad ones did not have. They served Van Der
> > Graaf, Stevie Wonder (on the the 3 good lps) and Gentle Giant very
> > well. They are standard sound set items.
>
>
