Mike (and group)
My personal opinion is to decline. Stock credit statement or not, in my eperience your work will be associated with the cause (ironically it may have been better if the music was used with NO credit).
As to limiting what can be used based on context and message I would say an emphatic yes - control (as best you can) what your work is associated with.
I talk from experience of having material (photographic, not musical) used trhis way
Just my 2d's worth.
Nic
At 04:12 23/02/2014, Mike Dickson wrote:
My personal opinion is to decline. Stock credit statement or not, in my eperience your work will be associated with the cause (ironically it may have been better if the music was used with NO credit).
As to limiting what can be used based on context and message I would say an emphatic yes - control (as best you can) what your work is associated with.
I talk from experience of having material (photographic, not musical) used trhis way
Just my 2d's worth.
Nic
At 04:12 23/02/2014, Mike Dickson wrote:
I've been contacted by someone who wants to use my music on one of his YouTube videos. Normally I say 'fair enough' and only ask that I am credited, but this thing there is a slight difference.
The guy is an advocate of views I find ethically repugnant. His stock credit does say that others whose work is credited in his videos do not necessarily agree with his views, etc, but somehow that doesn't seem enough.
Do you think I ought to limit who can use what I produce on the basis of what they are saying?
--
Mike Dickson
Edinburgh