Ack! I meant 35 notes.....maybe Markus added a few tuned up and down to the female Voice set but i don't think so. > My Female Voices have 25 notes...but the highest half octve or so doesn't > quite sound natural and the lowest notes sound like they have to shave > daily. The middle ground is beautiful though-just like the "Ambrosia > Singers"! The Male Voices on my original set were also 25 notes. > > >> I don't have access to my Chamberlins right now to check, but I know >> that >> the male voice does not go all the way up the keyboard and the female >> voice >> does not go all the way down. >> >> They mix in the middle though which is quite nice. >> >> Someone else with Male Voice on switch "A" and Female Voice on switch >> "B" >> would be able to help. >> >> Tom are you there? >> >> >> >> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 6:11 AM, tron400 <tron400@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> A question about the Solo Female Voice: is it really 17 notes or 25 >>> notes >>> as on the Pinder CD? Maybe the highest 8 notes have been tuned up for >>> the >>> CD? >>> >>> Bernie >>> >>> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, Bruce Daily <pocotron@...> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > \ufffd \ufffd \ufffd It is also interesting that the last\ufffd two Chamberlin M1's on >>> eBay >>> had sequential serial numbers (86103 and 86104). >>> > \ufffd >>> > \ufffd -Bruce D. >>> > >>> > >>> > --- On Tue, 5/24/11, Chris Dale <unobtainiumkeys@...> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > From: Chris Dale <unobtainiumkeys@...> >>> >>> > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Chamberlin sounds >>> > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com >>> > Date: Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 1:08 AM >>> > >>> > >>> > \ufffd >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > I did studio work for Sylvia Massy (the owner of this Chamberlin) >>> many >>> years ago. >>> > >>> > I guess with most of them being located in the greater Los Angeles >>> area, >>> she didn't feel the need to keep it if she could rent one from >>> somebody. >>> > >>> > I don't think the Rhythmate will sell for anywhere near the $4500 >>> listing >>> price. There just isn't the demand for them like there is for M1 >>> models. >>> > >>> > I doubt this was the last M1 made (the pilot light is a much older >>> style >>> and the switches are not chrome) but should that actually be the case >>> it's >>> build year would be early 1981, and there might be some alternate or >>> unreleased sounds in it. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:30 AM, markpringnz <markpringnz@...> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > \ufffd >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > I see it went for $9000, buy now price. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, "Charles" <charel196@> >>> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > another one on Ebay >>> > > >>> > > >>> http://cgi.ebay.com/RARE-Vintage-Chamberlin-M1-M-1-Optigan-Mellotron-/330567982620?pt=Keyboards_MIDI&hash=item4cf7631e1c >>> > > >>> > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, "Thomas C. Doncourt" >>> <tomdcour@> wrote: >>> > > > >>> > > > Mark, I can post note to note samples I made from the same >>> amplifier >>> and >>> > > > recording sytems if you like.. It might be better if I actually >>> played the >>> > > > same musical passages on the two instuments but I am away from >>> them >>> for >>> > > > the next week >>> > > > >>> > > > > Any chance of posting a recording? >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Mark >>> > > > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, "Thomas C. Doncourt" >>> > > > > <tomdcour@> wrote: >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> I can compare form an M1 and an M400 on the cello and 3 >>> violins. I >>> can't >>> > > > >> say which I like better though... the M1 is brighter in both >>> cases >>> but >>> > > > >> the >>> > > > >> M400 seems fuller. Two slightly different sounding instruments >>> but >>> each >>> > > > >> with its purpose. The M1 sounds better to me with the tone >>> control >>> > > > >> nearly >>> > > > >> all the way up - the M400 I have the tone at less than half. >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> > I would be interested to hear I direct comparison of the 3 >>> violins >>> > > > >> played >>> > > > >> > on an M400 and a Chamberlin, has anybody on the list got a >>> working >>> > > > >> > Chamberlin, did Mattias sort his out? >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > Mark >>> > > > >> > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, tronbros >>> <tronbros@> >>> wrote: >>> > > > >> >> >>> > > > >> >> Maybe different but not better. The M400 is capable of hifi >>> quality >>> > > > >> if >>> > > > >> >> given good source material. It is not the muffled lofi >>> beast >>> > > > >> everyone >>> > > > >> >> assumes. We have put excellent commercial recordings >>> through >>> them >>> > > > >> and >>> > > > >> >> they handle up to 16k, clear and precisely. Never >>> underestimate >>> the >>> > > > >> >> potential of a mellotron. >>> > > > >> >> >>> > > > >> >> Best, >>> > > > >> >> >>> > > > >> >> M >>> > > > >> >> >>> > > > >> >> mellotronics.co.uk >>> > > > >> >> >>> > > > >> >> >>> > > > >> >> >>> > > > >> >> On 22 May 2011, at 00:32, "markpringnz" <markpringnz@> >>> wrote: >>> > > > >> >> >>> > > > >> >> > Would these sound a lot different played through a >>> chamberlin? I >>> > > > >> would >>> > > > >> >> guess that they would. >>> > > > >> >> >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >> > > >
Message
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Chamberlin sounds
2011-05-25 by Thomas C. Doncourt
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.
