Absolutely. Just listen to the live recordings and you can really appreciate his work. Even when only playing two parts the orchestrations are beautiful.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-----Original Message-----
From: "Bernie" <kornowicz@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 19:12:14
To:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Second thoughts, an update
I have to agree. While others used only 2 or 3 different sounds,
Pinder used pretty much all that were available to him.
Bernie
--- In newmellotrongroup@ <mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com> yahoogroups.com, "tomdcour" <tomdcour@...>
wrote:
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-----Original Message-----
From: "Bernie" <kornowicz@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 19:12:14
To:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Second thoughts, an update
I have to agree. While others used only 2 or 3 different sounds,
Pinder used pretty much all that were available to him.
Bernie
--- In newmellotrongroup@ <mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com> yahoogroups.com, "tomdcour" <tomdcour@...>
wrote:
>Chamberlin to better use,
> Mike Pinder- In my opinion no one has ever put the Mellotron or
> or used a wider variety of sounds and techniques. Hisorchestrations made the music work
> (which is what orchestrations are supposed to do). The songsare ,more or less, vehicles
> for his beautiful mellotron playing. That is what makes the MoodyBlues worthwhile and
> the only thing that makes them noteworthy in a blog like this. TheMoody's "minimal
> songs allowed him to use a really big canvas of mellotron sounds.He didn't an intricate
> band like Yes or Genesis to try and weave his parts around.Whether you can stomach the
> rest of the Moody Blues or not I've got to give contnual credit toPinder as a master.
><owen@> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In newmellotrongroup@ <mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com> yahoogroups.com, "thinkingalouduk"
> ><djacques@> wrote:
> > --- In newmellotrongroup@ <mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com> yahoogroups.com, "David Jacques"
> > > All I can say is that you had to be there, living and growingup in the 60's
> > > and 70's, to truly appreciate the Moody Blues' music.Sojourn (the last of the 7)
> >
> > Interesting - as I wasn't born until around the time Seventh
> wasmusical diet at that
> > released. My exposure to the MBs came in the early 1980s - my
> pointalong with The
> > was Adam And The Ants, Duran Duran, Depeche Mode and their ilk,
> Mamasparents' era. Then along
> > and the Papas and a few other pop bits and pieces from my
> camemaking those weird string
> > a Moodies compilation and I couldn't work out how they were
> > sounds _without_ a string section (I couldn't do it on my Casio,and this was the 1980s).
> >the bits I _have_ heard
> > I've never really listened to classic prog; to my perception,
> usuallyguess I like songs
> > seem to meander on for too long without getting to the point. I
> ratherabilities of the players
> > than epics, and am not particularly bothered about the technical
> - ifwhether the performer
> > the sound that comes out at the end appeals to me, I don't care
> > can do six chromatic octaves in 10 seconds or whether it wascreated by a flock of
> geeseBlues, others don't. I can live
> > pecking at landmines.
> >
> > It's all just down to personal preference. I like the Moody
> > with that.
> >
> > Owen
> >
>
