Vance
On 1/3/2011 7:36 PM, Chris Dale wrote:
\ufffd
Having a two manual machine sounds a bit richer than one because you have two of everything.
Visually it's striking as well, because two manuals one above the other is not as surprising.
The tapes though in any two manual machine, must be in tune with each other - this is something that gets overlooked when swapping out tape sets.
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Gary Brumm <gabru@comsec.net> wrote:
\ufffdObviously the original ~had~ to be built that way (mechanical logistics) but why you would want to connect 2 manuals
side by side in ~modern~ times is beyond me\ufffd..
From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of lsf5275@aol.com
Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2011 8:30 PM
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: just throwing this out there too\ufffd
\ufffd
That would be kinda like putting a Ferrari engine in a Ford Cortina with all of the original Cortina Instruments and controls. That would be something, wouldn't it?
\ufffd
In a message dated 1/2/2011 9:39:19 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, charel196@yahoo.com writes:
I personally would love a dual manual M4000D (Markus' digital unit) in a replica MKII wooden cabinet with authentic controls, an accessible hard drive with the entire library, and digital reverb/efx with some nice JBL speakers in the cabinet:)