Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Thread

Re: OT Miniwave update ?/ was arpegiate

Re: OT Miniwave update ?/ was arpegiate

2001-01-03 by bigd@buffalo.com

Is John still re doing the miniwave still, anyone hear anything ?
Jim

Dave Bradley wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Har! Glad I bought a Wiard MiniWave when I did. It has a quantizer
> bank that has semitone, major and minor scales, etc. that you step
> through with an input cv.
>
> Moe
>
> --- In motm@egroups.com, jwbarlow@a... wrote:
> >
> > reasonable alternative which would cover at least a basic sequencer
> and the
> > arpeggiator desires might be a very simple digital (there! I said
> it!)
> > sequencer which would take a voltage in, allow it to be quantized
> (to
> > semitones, quarter tones or even less), and store that voltage in
> memory to a
> > length of N steps. An external clock could then be applied (to a
> clock input
> > of course) so the module would have all the stored voltages appear
> in
> > sequence at the output for all N cycles and then recycle. You could
> probably
> > add hold, up/down, reset inputs without any trouble.

Re: OT Miniwave update ?/ was arpegiate

2001-01-04 by Dave Bradley

--- In motm@egroups.com, bigd@b... wrote:
> Is John still re doing the miniwave still, anyone hear anything ?
> Jim

Haven't heard a word.

Moe

Re: [motm] Re: OT Miniwave update ?/ was arpegiate

2001-01-04 by bigd@buffalo.com

Is this good or bad news ?

John Blacet wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Still in the works....
>
> --
> ___________________
> John Blacet
> Blacet Research
> http://www.blacet.com

Re: [motm] Re: OT Miniwave update ?/ was arpegiate

2001-01-05 by davevosh@aol.com

In a message dated 01-01-04 11:30:57 EST, you write:

<< 
 Is this good or bad news ?
 
 John Blacet wrote:
 
 > Still in the works....
 > >>



good news, i hope !!!!
best,
dave v.

Re: [motm] Re: OT Miniwave update ?/ was arpegiate

2001-01-05 by davevosh@aol.com

In a message dated 01-01-04 11:47:55 EST, you write:

<< 
 It is certainly better than 'forgitaboutit"....
  >>


john,
that is certainly true !!! i hope that you and grant can work out a mutually 
beneficial arrangement to bring this interesting module back into production 
!!!!
best,
dave v.

Re: [motm] Re: OT Miniwave update ?/ was arpegiate

2001-01-05 by bigd@buffalo.com

davevosh@... wrote:

> john,
> that is certainly true !!! i hope that you and grant can work out a mutually
> beneficial arrangement to bring this interesting module back into production
> !!!!
> best,

yes, me too!Jim

Re: [motm] Re: OT Miniwave update ?/ was arpegiate

2001-01-05 by ixqy@aol.com

John Blacet writes of the possible Blacet MiniWave:

>   It is certainly better than 'forgitaboutit"....

 Dave V. writes:

>  john,
>  that is certainly true !!! i hope that you and grant can work out a 
mutually 
>  beneficial arrangement to bring this interesting module back into 
production 
>   !!!!

 I would like to add that along with the MinWave, I'd like to see Blacet 
release the Joyrider filter as well. My next filter purchase will be the MOTM 
440, but after that, I'd love to hear what the Joyrider sounds like.

 Still dreaming of a MOTM style tracking generator...  ; )
 Andrew Sanchez

Re: OT Miniwave update ?/ was arpegiate

2001-01-05 by ceres@sirius.com

--- In motm@egroups.com, ixqy@a... wrote:
>  I would like to add that along with the MinWave, I'd like to see 
Blacet 
> release the Joyrider filter as well. My next filter purchase will 
be the MOTM 
> 440, but after that, I'd love to hear what the Joyrider sounds like.

It's the same filter as the large-size 'Borg Filter' module (minus 
the two oscillators), which is inspired by Buchla filters.  I'm not 
quite sure how to describe it, but it sounds very different from any 
of the MOTM filters or the Blacet Final Filtre (which, itself, sounds 
quite different from any other filter I've heard).  It's good for 
getting somewhat "woody" or "natural" sounds, like simulating a 
marimba "boink" or a flute "chiff".

    -Doug
     ceres@...

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.