MOTM

A properly painted mini-panel (no holes or slots) would do fine for me; I
can drill my own.

Why not just drill or punch a whole at the fabricators? A prefer a hole to
a slot anyway.

--Todd

> I meant to say 0.875". I may opt for 0.825 to be safe. I will
> try to get a "slot" for the screw hole.
> Note that if a tool to punch said slot is not already available,
> I will have to spend $95 for a custom job
> which I may be reluctant to do (or I'd have to raise the panel prices).
> Paul S.

Becaise with a slot, you can slide it side-to-side easier to reduce possible
interference with the end panels .

But, I will *probably* use an over-sized hole, and note that the distance
from the hole center-line to the
nearest MOTM panel must be 0.500, but since the panel width is NOT 1.000"
then one end
must be turned "unside down" wrt the other end.

Paul S.
BTW: Drilling these panels is not for the feint of heart.
BTW2: got those filters humming yet?


-----Original Message-----
From: Tentochi <tentochi@...>
To: motm@onelist.com <motm@onelist.com>
Date: Sunday, July 04, 1999 2:34 PM
Subject: Re: [motm] Rail width errata

>From: "Tentochi" <tentochi@...>
>
>A properly painted mini-panel (no holes or slots) would do fine for me; I
>can drill my own.
>
>Why not just drill or punch a whole at the fabricators? A prefer a hole to
>a slot anyway.
>
>--Todd
>
>> I meant to say 0.875". I may opt for 0.825 to be safe. I will
>> try to get a "slot" for the screw hole.
>> Note that if a tool to punch said slot is not already available,
>> I will have to spend $95 for a custom job
>> which I may be reluctant to do (or I'd have to raise the panel prices).
>> Paul S.
>
>
>--------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------
>
>ONElist: where real people with real interests get connected.
>http://www.onelist.com
>Join a new list today!
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>