MOTM

I would be interested in the blacet Delay panel and also a blacet Final 
Filtre panel. IMHO, I recommend this filter to all of you who are curious. I 
have had nothing but fun with it and having an envelope on the filtre is a 
really great feature. Fun for modulations and retriggering loops as they go 
through the filtre. Filtre response is different from either of the current 
MOTM filters and is 5-pole in design. I get crazy sounds running my MOTM-420 
into the final filtre. When are we going to see a module with the combined 
talents of Paul and John? What do you say fellas

Thomas White
DJTW

PS. How is a pulse divider typically patched into a system?


>From: "Dave Bradley" <daveb@...>
>Reply-To: motm@egroups.com
>To: <motm@egroups.com>
>Subject: RE: [motm] My MOTM DarkStar - (was Blacet-MOTM adaptor)
>Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 10:11:08 -0500
>
>I don't want to say more before plans firm up, but several of us are 
>talking
>with a goal to setting up a service for MOTM diyers, which provides high
>quality silkscreened front panels. You may be sure that the Time Machine
>will be one of the first available, cause I have one on order myself<g>!
>
>Don't ask me about prices just yet. We have to come up with a fair way of
>recovering the cost of the original screen over time, based on estimating
>how popular a panel might be, etc. Probably would have to set up a web page
>somewhere, showcasing all the available designs.
>
>Please note, just having a nice front panel is NOT going to turn your
>project into a MOTM kit! There will typically be other hurdles in
>construction and/or electronics mods to fit a Blacet or whatever other
>design into the MOTM format.
>
>Dave Bradley
>Principal Software Engineer
>Engineering Animation, Inc.
>daveb@...
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: jwbarlow@... [mailto:jwbarlow@...]
> > Sent: Monday, June 19, 2000 8:31 PM
> > To: motm@egroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [motm] My MOTM DarkStar - (was Blacet-MOTM adaptor)
> >
> >
> > Hey Moe! I think your panel looks great! I'd like to hear more
> > about how this
> > process is going. Will this "service" be available to other MOTM 
>listers?
> > Roughly how much will this be costing you per panel?
> >
> > As for John Blacet's idea of the "panel in a panel," at first I
> > though it was
> > kind of neat, but not the way I'd go. Then I realized that it
> > would still be
> > a good idea.
> >
> > Suppose one was to get a Blacet module which doesn't have (nor
> > will likely
> > ever have) a close MOTM cousin like the Time Machine VC BBD
> > module. It seems
> > to me that both a Blacet kit and a MOTM kit take about the same amount 
>of
> > time to assemble, but if there are no MOTM size front panels
> > available for
> > this module, one needs to diy one of these -- which would take a
> > long time.
> > So as a short term solution to this problem, the Blacet/MOTM
> > adapters would
> > be great -- I'd probably get a couple of them for the temporary 
>solution.
> > MOTM-Blacet Time Machine, hmmm......
> >
> > JB
> >
>

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com

On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, thomas white wrote:

> PS. How is a pulse divider typically patched into a system?

  A source of a pulse or pulses is needed.  Note that this does not have
to be anything in particular: the input is similar to those of an MOTM-120
in that any waveform can be used.

  Here are a few uses I can think of:

  *) Triggering an event on the Nth trigger pulse received.

  *) Generating an interval harmonic of a frequency (e.g., f/1.5)

  *) Synchronzing an oscillator at a rate that is f/N of the "master" osc.

  *) Use an LFO to constantly vary the divisor, N.  Mix some of the dry
input frequency (such as another waveform off an osc) together with the
variable rate output of the pulse divider to obtain a geometric
progression and/or (depends on LFO waveform) recession of the harmonic
structure.

  Of course, a lot more can be tried--these are just things I thought of
off the cuff while replying to the email.

Crow

/**/

Hmmm... here's a brain hiccup:

Audio In -> Pulse Divider In
Pulse Divider Out -> EG Trigger (gate?)
EG Out -> VCA Trigger
Audio In -> VCA Audio In
VCA Audio Out -> Audio Out

I think you'd get a rapid-fire shuttering effect on the audio based on the
frequency (and amplitude?) of the signal.  Play with the envelope settings
and the pulse division to get different shutters.

Thoughts?

--PBr

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	The Old Crow [SMTP:oldcrow@...]
> Sent:	Tuesday, June 20, 2000 9:15 AM
> To:	motm@egroups.com
> Subject:	Re: [motm] (was Blacet-MOTM adaptor) Pulse divider
> 
> 
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, thomas white wrote:
> 
> > PS. How is a pulse divider typically patched into a system?
> 
>   A source of a pulse or pulses is needed.  Note that this does not have
> to be anything in particular: the input is similar to those of an MOTM-120
> in that any waveform can be used.
> 
>   Here are a few uses I can think of:
> 
>   *) Triggering an event on the Nth trigger pulse received.
> 
>   *) Generating an interval harmonic of a frequency (e.g., f/1.5)
> 
>   *) Synchronzing an oscillator at a rate that is f/N of the "master" osc.
> 
>   *) Use an LFO to constantly vary the divisor, N.  Mix some of the dry
> input frequency (such as another waveform off an osc) together with the
> variable rate output of the pulse divider to obtain a geometric
> progression and/or (depends on LFO waveform) recession of the harmonic
> structure.
> 
>   Of course, a lot more can be tried--these are just things I thought of
> off the cuff while replying to the email.
> 
> Crow
> 
> /**/
>