RE: [motm] Delay Module
2000-04-20 by Brousseau, Paul E (Paul)
I think it sounds like a real alternative. I don't know about the mysterious workings of DIMMs, but for the one real electrical engineering project I worked on in college, we used DRAM for (very slow) video capture. More like a freeze frame, really. At any rate, we used a fixed crystal to clock the memory (and cpu). Now, I don't know the mechanics / output of a crystal, but I think it just outputs a pulse... which is similar to a square wave at a small duty cycle. So you get a simple square-wave-only oscillator, use that to clock a A/D, D/A, a large counter, and memory, and you're set...? Most digital delays, I imagine, would mix the signals digitally (so you get a really clean infinite repeat), but I think this model would mix analog signals for simplicity's sake... no real cpu, after all. As a neat bonus, you could have the typical de-aliasing LP filter switch between before and after feedback (always after the D/A, of course). Before feedback mode would produce the well-known damped-feedback sound. After feedback mode would produced ever-more-aliased feedback, for a possibly weird sound-munging effect. (Or maybe you would just turn off anti-alising all together?) The problem here, I think, would be getting those really-short delay times that digital delays can easily handle. Digital delays can easily control which memory location they start and stop reading from. This hybrid delay would always run its course through the entire memory; shorter delay times would read the memory faster. Or would that just produce a pitch bend effect...? --PBr, early-morning blabber, half-asleep and confused in general
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tkacs, Ken [SMTP:ken.tkacs@...] > Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2000 6:00 AM > To: 'MOTM Forum All' > Subject: [motm] Delay Module > > > How feasible is this idea of creating an 'analog delay' using digital RAM? > Is that an oxymoron, or is this a legitimate concept? > > The good points of course are that you don't need bucket-brigade device > chips that will go out of production, and extensibility. It sure would be > cool if such a module could be based on, say, PC EDO RAM DIMMs or > something, > with lots of extra sockets so that DIMMs could be added later. > > Think about it-a few years from now when your Pentium III is a boat > anchor, > you can throw the PC out and move the RAM into the delay module to get > some > real use out of it! >