Re: [motm] MOTM-820 VC Lag - Preview
2000-04-04 by J. Larry Hendry
> From: Dave Bradley <daveb@...> > > I'll take a red led and $149 anytime! > > Moe Yes, but "nasty red?" LH
Thread
Re: [motm] MOTM-820 VC Lag - Preview
Re: [motm] MOTM-820 VC Lag - Preview
2000-04-04 by Paul Schreiber
That's the *only* thing in the world she's not complaining about. Paul S. trying not to think about it ----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Tkacs, Ken <ken.tkacs@...> To: <motm@egroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2000 9:36 AM Subject: RE: [motm] MOTM-820 VC Lag - Preview > > What did your daughter do? Is she complaining about the LED too? > > :) > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Schreiber [mailto:synth1@...] > Sent: Tuesday, 04 April, 2000 10:42 AM > To: motm@egroups.com > Subject: Re: [motm] MOTM-820 VC Lag - Preview > > > Paul S. > 14yr old daughter makes me crazy > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > DON'T HATE YOUR RATE! > Get a NextCard Visa, in 30 seconds! Get rates as low as > 0.0% Intro or 9.9% Fixed APR and no hidden fees. > Apply NOW! > http://click.egroups.com/1/2120/3/_/529958/_/954859466/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >
Re: [motm] MOTM-820 VC Lag - Preview
2000-04-05 by Paul Schreiber
> I know this is supposed to be simple, so I'll try to keep it that way. If > I understand, the lag is bypassed when the switch contact is made up. So, > if a guy wanted to have "LAG" only when remote switch is depressed, he > would wire to his switches N.O. contact. Someone wanting to "tap on" and > "tap off" would need a push-on / push-off switch. The bypass is only > bypassed when the tip is actually shorted to ground. Do I have that right? Correct.