MOTM

> From: "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...>
>
> Things I missed:
>
> a) the TRI out is unaffected by SHAPE, it's always a TRI. The RAMP at 50%
> *is* a TRI as well.
> On either side, it approaches SAWtooth.

OK, that makes sense to even me.

> b) I don't think a dual VCLFO makes sense because how could it differ

from 2

> of the 1Us? The cost
> IS THE SAME.

I agree. I would rather have two separate units (whether 1 or 2 space)
than a dual LFO if the cost is close to the same.

Larry Hendry

Things I missed:

a) the TRI out is unaffected by SHAPE, it's always a TRI. The RAMP at 50%
*is* a TRI as well.
On either side, it approaches SAWtooth.

b) I don't think a dual VCLFO makes sense because how could it differ from 2
of the 1Us? The cost
IS THE SAME.

c) This is a fairly complicated kit: there is a tempco in there and has as
many parts as a '110. There are NO trims
in this kit. You get to use more heat-sink 'goop' to make a
transistor/tempco/transistor sandwich. Yummy!

Even though the panel is 1U wide, the pc board will more than likely be
"full-sized".

Other comments/complaints welcome.

Paul S.