Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Archive for motm.

Index last updated: 2026-03-30 01:13 UTC

Thread

LED

LED

1999-03-31 by Paul Schreiber

I agree that CLIP is NOT the right label.

LEVEL is more correct.

But I'm worried about all that wiring again. I could sacrifice 1 CV input
and just have 2: 1V/O and the fancy
- to + large sweep one. I think 3 audio inputs are groovy.

Paul S.

Re: LED

1999-03-31 by Paul Schreiber

Me, too.

Also note this kit will have newer Bourns pots (the blue type in the ADSR)
that have
lugs to solder to as opposed to pins, for pots on the "left column". Pots on
the pcb are Spectrol
as usual.

I must say this is a wicked mama of a filter. I'm not going to push it as a
******KORG MS-20 CLONE ********
so Japan won't nuke me. Rather, as Larry and other owners will say, the
crappy VCA with the funky
bass-boost is also part of the MS-20 "sound". But I think the MOTM version
will keep you folks up late.

Paul S.

-----Original Message-----
From: J. Larry Hendry <jlarryh@...>
To: motm@onelist.com <motm@onelist.com>
Date: Tuesday, March 30, 1999 10:28 PM
Subject: [motm] Re: LED


>From: "J. Larry Hendry" <jlarryh@...>
>
>I don't see a lot of value myself in a "level" LED. Certainly not worth
>sacraficing other useful features.
>
>As always, opinions will differ and mileage will vary.
>Larry
>----------
>>
>> From: "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...>
>>
>> I agree that CLIP is NOT the right label.
>>
>> LEVEL is more correct.
>>
>> But I'm worried about all that wiring again. I could sacrifice 1 CV input
>> and just have 2: 1V/O and the fancy
>> - to + large sweep one. I think 3 audio inputs are groovy.
>>
>> Paul S.
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>We have a new web site!
>http://www.onelist.com
>Onelist: The leading provider of free email community services
>

Re: LED

1999-03-31 by J. Larry Hendry

I don't see a lot of value myself in a "level" LED. Certainly not worth
sacraficing other useful features.

As always, opinions will differ and mileage will vary.
Larry
----------
>
> From: "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...>
>
> I agree that CLIP is NOT the right label.
>
> LEVEL is more correct.
>
> But I'm worried about all that wiring again. I could sacrifice 1 CV input
> and just have 2: 1V/O and the fancy
> - to + large sweep one. I think 3 audio inputs are groovy.
>
> Paul S.

Re: LED

1999-03-31 by Dave Bradley

No! Nein! Nyet! I love blinky lights, and am perfectly willing to do the
extra wiring, but NEVER sacrifice an additional attenuated CV input as the
price of the LED. I'll have velocity and an envelope hooked up most of the
time, and both need to be attenuated!

3 attenuated audio inputs are indeed groovy! The standard Emu only has 2
attenuated and 1 full level. Way to go!

Dave Bradley
Principal Software Engineer
Engineering Animation, Inc.
daveb@...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Schreiber [mailto:synth1@...]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 1999 10:24 PM
> To: motm@onelist.com
> Subject: [motm] LED
>
>
> From: "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...>
>
> I agree that CLIP is NOT the right label.
>
> LEVEL is more correct.
>
> But I'm worried about all that wiring again. I could sacrifice 1 CV input
> and just have 2: 1V/O and the fancy
> - to + large sweep one. I think 3 audio inputs are groovy.
>
> Paul S.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Is ONElist important to you? Has it changed your life?
> http://www.onelist.com
> Come visit our new web site and share with us your stories
>

Re: LED

1999-04-01 by JWBarlow@xxx.xxx

Hi Paul, everybody,

It seems there is general agreement on the idea of not losing either an input
or an attenuator for the LED. But in case you do put it in ALA Dave's pic,
maybe you can tell us if the filter sounds good when overdriven (use a
continuous level indicator), or bad (use a clip blinking LED).

JB

Re: LED

1999-04-01 by Paul Schreiber

OK OK I'll keep it. Don't complain about:

a) price too high
b) lots of wires

CLIP is not the right word, it's really LEVEL.

Paul S.

-----Original Message-----
From: JWBarlow@... <JWBarlow@...>
To: motm@onelist.com <motm@onelist.com>
Date: Wednesday, March 31, 1999 7:43 PM
Subject: [motm] Re: LED


>From: JWBarlow@...
>
>Hi Paul, everybody,
>
>It seems there is general agreement on the idea of not losing either an
input
>or an attenuator for the LED. But in case you do put it in ALA Dave's pic,
>maybe you can tell us if the filter sounds good when overdriven (use a
>continuous level indicator), or bad (use a clip blinking LED).
>
>JB
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>New hobbies? New curiosities? New enthusiasms?
>http://www.onelist.com
>Sign up for a new email list today
>