Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Archive for motm.

Index last updated: 2026-03-30 01:13 UTC

Thread

148 vs 248J pots

148 vs 248J pots

2013-02-14 by gooboworks

I am assembling a 440 kit I got a long time ago. The instructions call for 3 Spectrol 248J 100K pots. In my parts bag, I don't have 248J pots, I have 3 148 pots.

I think I may have a parts mixup, I assume I cannot use the 148's in place of the 248J's? Is that correct?

Thanks
Andy

RE: [motm] 148 vs 248J pots

2013-02-14 by John L Rice

I "think" you are probably OK. The 248 series is just a less expensive
version of the 149

http://modularsynthesis.com/modules/parts/parts.htm

John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
> gooboworks
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 9:30 PM
> To: motm@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [motm] 148 vs 248J pots
>
> I am assembling a 440 kit I got a long time ago. The instructions call
for 3
> Spectrol 248J 100K pots. In my parts bag, I don't have 248J pots, I have
3
> 148 pots.
>
> I think I may have a parts mixup, I assume I cannot use the 148's in place
of
> the 248J's? Is that correct?
>
> Thanks
> Andy
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

Re: [motm] 148 vs 248J pots

2013-02-14 by groovyshaman

Those will work fine, and they'll last longer.

George


----- Original Message ----
From: gooboworks <andy.miller@...>
To: motm@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, February 14, 2013 12:30:28 AM
Subject: [motm] 148 vs 248J pots

I am assembling a 440 kit I got a long time ago.  The instructions call for 3
Spectrol 248J 100K pots.  In my parts bag, I don't have 248J pots, I have 3 148
pots.

I think I may have a parts mixup, I assume I cannot use the 148's in place of
the 248J's?    Is that correct?


Thanks
Andy



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links