OK...so what WILL you buy assembled?
2010-04-26 by Paul Schreiber
Yahoo Groups archive
Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC
Thread
2010-04-26 by Paul Schreiber
So, here is you chance to tell me what *exactly* you would buy, fully assembled in SMT glory. I'm all ears. Analog, digital, optical, whatever. Paul S.
2010-04-26 by Thomas White
CG with Expansion Module Morphing Terrarium Stereo Chorus/flanger module (you know you could do thus one proper too!) CV Digital Delay Triple Pre Amp CV controlled sampler (4 samples with trig in's to play, and looping mode controlled by analog clock input... Hey, no harm in hoping) High quality CV controlled Software Reverb Thomas White Natural Rhythm Music www.naturalrhythmmusic.com On Apr 26, 2010, at 8:16 AM, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@airmail.net> wrote: So, here is you chance to tell me what *exactly* you would buy, fully assembled in SMT glory. I'm all ears. Analog, digital, optical, whatever. Paul S.
2010-04-26 by Matthew Hiscock
CG with Expansion ModuleMorphing TerrariumStereo Chorus/flanger module (you know you could do thus one proper too!)CV Digital DelayTriple Pre AmpCV controlled sampler (4 samples with trig in's to play, and looping mode controlled by analog clock input... Hey, no harm in hoping)High quality CV controlled Software ReverbSo, here is you chance to tell me what *exactly* you would buy, fully
assembled in SMT glory.
I'm all ears. Analog, digital, optical, whatever.
Paul S.
2010-04-26 by Paul Schreiber
----- Original Message -----From: Matthew HiscockTo: MOTM-listSent: Monday, April 26, 2010 10:33 AMSubject: Re: [motm] OK...so what WILL you buy assembled?Shudder to think how much it would cost but a CV sampler would be a dream come true.
On 26-Apr-10, at 11:26 AM, Thomas White wrote:
CG with Expansion ModuleMorphing TerrariumStereo Chorus/flanger module (you know you could do thus one proper too!)CV Digital DelayTriple Pre AmpCV controlled sampler (4 samples with trig in's to play, and looping mode controlled by analog clock input... Hey, no harm in hoping)High quality CV controlled Software ReverbSo, here is you chance to tell me what *exactly* you would buy, fully
assembled in SMT glory.
I'm all ears. Analog, digital, optical, whatever.
Paul S.
2010-04-26 by Ross Stapf
From what has been mentioned recently, the cloud Generator and the expander would be first on the list. Then the Morphing T..., Then the Sequencer. Ross ________________________________
From: Paul Schreiber <synth1@...> To: MOTM List <motm@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Mon, April 26, 2010 10:16:57 AM Subject: [motm] OK...so what WILL you buy assembled? So, here is you chance to tell me what *exactly* you would buy, fully assembled in SMT glory. I'm all ears. Analog, digital, optical, whatever. Paul S.
2010-04-26 by Miguel Mendoza
So, here is you chance to tell me what *exactly* you would buy, fully
assembled in SMT glory.
I'm all ears. Analog, digital, optical,
whatever.
Paul S.
2010-04-26 by Paul Schreiber
2010-04-26 by Frank Vanaman
Hi all- I'd still buy the long promised cloud generator. I'd have bought it when the original demos came out. Obviously I'm not in a hurry. :-O Frank
From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Schreiber Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 11:17 AM To: MOTM List Subject: [motm] OK...so what WILL you buy assembled? So, here is you chance to tell me what *exactly* you would buy, fully assembled in SMT glory. I'm all ears. Analog, digital, optical, whatever. Paul S.
2010-04-26 by groovyshaman
From: Paul Schreiber
Subject: [motm] OK...so what WILL you buy assembled?
To: "MOTM List"
Date: Monday, April 26, 2010, 11:16 AMSo, here is you chance to tell me what *exactly* you would buy, fully
assembled in SMT glory.
I'm all ears. Analog, digital, optical, whatever.
Paul S.
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/motm/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/motm/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
motm-digest@yahoogroups.com
motm-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
motm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
2010-04-26 by Frank Vanaman
As an aside, I'm less hung up on getting a kit. Assembled would be just fine from my perspective. Sure it can be fun to assemble, but my time is tighter now than ever before, and my eyes are "tired-er" now than ever before. Would I rather spend my time building or playing? Playing. J Frank From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Frank Vanaman Hi all- I'd still buy the long promised cloud generator. I'd have bought it when the original demos came out.
2010-04-26 by Miguel Mendoza
2010-04-26 by hearts + horses
I would buy one of those. I'd use it more as a looper/live sampler wes --- On Mon, 4/26/10, Miguel Mendoza <miguel@...> wrote:
From: Miguel Mendoza <miguel@...> Subject: Re: [motm] OK...so what WILL you buy assembled? To: "MOTM-list" <motm@yahoogroups.com> Date: Monday, April 26, 2010, 9:19 AM I'll buy one. I just bought an Empress SuperDelay, nice features like reverse delay, looper, tape delay emulation, tap tempo, etc. I'd love to have something like this in my modular. Cheers! Miguel. From: Paul Schreiber Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:54 PM To: MOTM-list Subject: Re: [motm] OK...so what WILL you buy assembled? FYI: Eric & I (with Robert Rich) are poking at going a high-end digital delay with nifty features. Memory is pretty cheap, it can also be a looper (like 16 seconds of 96KHz audio at 24-bits). Paul S.
2010-04-26 by Ritchie DeCarlo
Assembled Sequencer like the one in that 2006 NAMM youTube video. I must say: IT'S GREAT TO SEE SO MANY OF YOU STILL ON THIS FORUM!! Haven't seen this much activity in about a year......... ________________________________
From: Miguel Mendoza <miguel@...> To: MOTM-list <motm@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Mon, April 26, 2010 12:19:55 PM Subject: Re: [motm] OK...so what WILL you buy assembled? I'll buy one. I just bought an Empress SuperDelay, nice features like reverse delay, looper, tape delay emulation, tap tempo, etc. I'd love to have something like this in my modular. Cheers! Miguel. From: Paul Schreiber Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:54 PM To: MOTM-list Subject: Re: [motm] OK...so what WILL you buy assembled? FYI: Eric & I (with Robert Rich) are poking at going a high-end digital delay with nifty features. Memory is pretty cheap, it can also be a looper (like 16 seconds of 96KHz audio at 24-bits). Paul S.
2010-04-26 by groovyshaman
From: groovyshaman
Subject: Re: [motm] OK...so what WILL you buy assembled?
To: "MOTM List" , "Paul Schreiber"
Date: Monday, April 26, 2010, 11:58 AM
Morphing Terrarium
Cloud Generator w/expansion module
Rhythm Wheel
SEM Filter
Full Featured MOTM Sequencer - MOAS or DOMOAS
Any CV Digital Delay / Reverb / Chorus / Phaser / Flanger / Sampler / Echo
There might have been a few other cool MOTM-500 series planned way back but I can't remember them all right now.
I'd include MOTM-450 but looks like JH may have that taken care of.
George
--- On Mon, 4/26/10, Paul Schreiber wrote:
From: Paul Schreiber
Subject: [motm] OK...so what WILL you buy assembled?
To: "MOTM List"
Date: Monday, April 26, 2010, 11:16 AMSo, here is you chance to tell me what *exactly* you would buy, fully
assembled in SMT glory.
I'm all ears. Analog, digital, optical, whatever.
Paul S.
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/motm/
<;*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/motm/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
; motm-digest@yahoogroups.com
motm-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
motm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
2010-04-26 by mkoapl
Paul, I would buy anything in full SMT assembly as long as it was in the full size MOTM format. The form factor is extremely important to me. If SMT means the modules are more available with near-immediate ship times from you, that would be terrific. I would buy any of the original MOTM modules, like the MOTM-300, redone in SMT. I would buy: filter banks sinewave banks for additive synthesis full featured oscillators, like the ZO switching/signal path modules digital event generators digital samplers and delays I would like to see analog and digital options. Keep up the stunning quality and full size interface, and I am interested in it all. I would also be willing to buy SMT assembled boards to kit together any off board jacks and pots, as long as you plan ahead and provide mounting capabilities and sell the hardware to do it. I just don't want some cheesey Doepfer modules with pitiful componentry and a lousy interface. Stick with the Switchcraft, NKK, and ALCO. --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...> wrote:
> > So, here is you chance to tell me what *exactly* you would buy, fully > assembled in SMT glory. > > I'm all ears. Analog, digital, optical, whatever. > > Paul S. >
2010-04-26 by thomas white
OoooohhhhH! Nice one. I'd sign right up for that. Make it have CV control of tap divisions like Dr. Vague's videos of his Modcan plus his clock division switch on Youtube. I'm in! Thomas White Natural Rhythm www.naturalrhythmmusic.com --- On Mon, 4/26/10, Paul Schreiber <synth1@...> wrote:
From: Paul Schreiber <synth1@...> Subject: Re: [motm] OK...so what WILL you buy assembled? To: "MOTM-list" <motm@yahoogroups.com> Date: Monday, April 26, 2010, 8:54 AM FYI: Eric & I (with Robert Rich) are poking at going a high-end digital delay with nifty features. Memory is pretty cheap, it can also be a looper (like 16 seconds of 96KHz audio at 24-bits). Paul S.
2010-04-26 by Jeff Laity
CG with Expansion ModuleMorphing TerrariumStereo Chorus/flanger module (you know you could do thus one proper too!)CV Digital DelayTriple Pre AmpCV controlled sampler (4 samples with trig in's to play, and looping mode controlled by analog clock input... Hey, no harm in hoping)High quality CV controlled Software ReverbSo, here is you chance to tell me what *exactly* you would buy, fully
assembled in SMT glory.
I'm all ears. Analog, digital, optical, whatever.
Paul S.
NOTICE: This electronic mail message and its contents, including any attachments hereto (collectively, "this e-mail"), is hereby designated as "confidential and proprietary." This e-mail may be viewed and used only by the person to whom it has been sent and his/her employer solely for the express purpose for which it has been disclosed and only in accordance with any confidentiality or non-disclosure (or similar) agreement between TEAC Corporation or its affiliates and said employer, and may not be disclosed to any other person or entity.
2010-04-26 by hearts + horses
I don't care if anything is digital or analog anymore. If it does something cool that's all I care about. I moved over to the eurorack format a few years ago. I don't like waiting however many years for a module to be released or for something to ship. that had a lot to do with it plus, bringing a system to shows was a lot easier too. I still have my MOTM system though :) wes --- On Mon, 4/26/10, mkoapl <mkoapl@...> wrote: From: mkoapl <mkoapl@...> Subject: [motm] Re: OK...so what WILL you buy assembled? To: motm@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, April 26, 2010, 9:32 AM Paul, I would buy anything in full SMT assembly as long as it was in the full size MOTM format. The form factor is extremely important to me. If SMT means the modules are more available with near-immediate ship times from you, that would be terrific. I would buy any of the original MOTM modules, like the MOTM-300, redone in SMT. I would buy: filter banks sinewave banks for additive synthesis full featured oscillators, like the ZO switching/signal path modules digital event generators digital samplers and delays I would like to see analog and digital options. Keep up the stunning quality and full size interface, and I am interested in it all. I would also be willing to buy SMT assembled boards to kit together any off board jacks and pots, as long as you plan ahead and provide mounting capabilities and sell the hardware to do it. I just don't want some cheesey Doepfer modules with pitiful componentry and a lousy interface. Stick with the Switchcraft, NKK, and ALCO. --- In motm@yahoogroups. com, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...> wrote:
> > So, here is you chance to tell me what *exactly* you would buy, fully > assembled in SMT glory. > > I'm all ears. Analog, digital, optical, whatever. > > Paul S. >
2010-04-26 by thomas white
"MOTM-540 Munging Decimator (VC bit-rate reduction)" Look at the OTO Biscuit. It has the 8-Bit thing with Digital Delay, Wavetable Control, Stereo Multimode Filter with Fliter Sequencer for $600. No external control via CV of filter. Imagine a MOTM version for $500 with similar options and Paul's MOTM twists. This type of module under CV control would be impressive. I have want for the OTO, but $600 is a lot for something with only MIDI control of features. I can MIDI control these types of effects in my computer with automation, but I can also control plug ins with automation and still to this day the computer does not have the resolution and tone that external analog gear has (no flames here, just facts in my studio with Logic Pro). I'd buy one of these in MOTM right off. Thanks for bringing up the Munging Decimator! Thomas Thomas White Natural Rhythm www.naturalrhythmmusic.com --- On Mon, 4/26/10, groovyshaman <groovyshaman@...> wrote:
From: groovyshaman <groovyshaman@...> Subject: Re: [motm] OK...so what WILL you buy assembled? To: "MOTM List" <motm@yahoogroups.com>, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...> Date: Monday, April 26, 2010, 9:30 AM Ok I found my master list. Seems every year or so I need to republish a revised version. :) SMT pre-built I'd buy: Morphing Terrarium MOTM-102 Noise/ASR MOTM-520 Cloud Generator w/521 MOTM-530 Envelope Nest (bizarre EG) MOTM-540 Munging Decimator (VC bit-rate reduction) MOTM-550 Rhythm Wheel (Seq/ASR/S&H w/pattern gen) Any CV Digital Delay, Reverb, Chorus, Phaser, Flanger, Sampler, Echo Old but likely resurrect-able in SMT that I'd buy: MOTM-125 Pulse Width Multiplier Dual 10000ms Delay (discussed 8/19/00) DoMOAS (Daughter of Mother of all Sequencers) VC Phase Shifter Synthtech Vocoder Died a horrible death - that I wanted to buy (sigh): MOTM-130 Dual Pan/Fade VCA (so close!) MOTM-180 Triple Preamp MOTM-450 Fixed Filter Bank (ugh) MOTM-460 ARP 2600-4072 VCF MOTM-470 SEM VCF w/morphing output MOTM-600 uSequencer (double ugh) MOTM-810 JH's VC EG MOTM-840 Envelope Follower/Compressor MOTM-880 VC Filter Envelope Generator (CS-80) Matrix-12 15-Mode VCF Bi-Phase Clone Joystick Interface Random Vibrato Source (discussed 11/23/00) George --- On Mon, 4/26/10, groovyshaman <groovyshaman@ snet.net> wrote: From: groovyshaman <groovyshaman@ snet.net> Subject: Re: [motm] OK...so what WILL you buy assembled? To: "MOTM List" <motm@yahoogroups. com>, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@airmail. net> Date: Monday, April 26, 2010, 11:58 AM Morphing Terrarium Cloud Generator w/expansion module Rhythm Wheel SEM Filter Full Featured MOTM Sequencer - MOAS or DOMOAS Any CV Digital Delay / Reverb / Chorus / Phaser / Flanger / Sampler / Echo There might have been a few other cool MOTM-500 series planned way back but I can't remember them all right now. I'd include MOTM-450 but looks like JH may have that taken care of. George --- On Mon, 4/26/10, Paul Schreiber <synth1@airmail. net> wrote: From: Paul Schreiber <synth1@airmail. net> Subject: [motm] OK...so what WILL you buy assembled? To: "MOTM List" <motm@yahoogroups. com> Date: Monday, April 26, 2010, 11:16 AM So, here is you chance to tell me what *exactly* you would buy, fully assembled in SMT glory. I'm all ears. Analog, digital, optical, whatever. Paul S. ------------ --------- --------- ------ Yahoo! Groups Links
2010-04-26 by IvanCU2
Oberheim SEM-type filter Mutron Bi-Phase phaser Other "non traditional" synth modules. --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...> wrote:
> > So, here is you chance to tell me what *exactly* you would buy, fully > assembled in SMT glory. > > I'm all ears. Analog, digital, optical, whatever. > > Paul S. >
2010-04-26 by IvanCU2
Oh yes, I still would buy the Mother of all Sequencers!
2010-04-26 by IvanCU2
Yes! The Cloud Generator and MT are interesting to me because of this as well, but I haven't gotten into the Eurorack format... yet. --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Miguel Mendoza" <miguel@...> wrote:
> > I need more 'unconventional' modules. >
2010-04-26 by rogerpellegrini
Having cooled off from my last message, I'll start by observing that the market for modules today is significantly different from a few years back. There are now MANY formats and manufacturers to choose from, most of whom can ship with minimal lead time. I can't even count the number of "standard" modules (e.g. VCA, Noise, VCF, VCO) there are out there. To make sales a new module has to rise above the din with unique, desirable and useful features. I applaud design decisions (i.e. alternate power connectors) that streamline 3rd-party alternate format repackaging. This obviously multiplies the size of the market for any new design. It would be best for the customers if MOTM's release of new modules were coordinated with 3rd party repackagers to make delivery (and support) in any of a variety of formats a seamless shopping experience. I'd vote FOR: * Cloud Generator + Expander * Morphing Terrarium * Digital Additive Synthesis module: Very simple envelope control of many harmonics. Maybe a "learn" mode to allow analysis of incoming audio and subsequent resynthesis. Voltage control of "chaos" in harmonic levels. Mode where multiple detuned and otherwise slightly randomized copies of the voice are output. Simple interface. Musical results. * Physical Modeling modules: think specific models, like a "pipe" module, or a "Karplus-Strong" module with voltage control of a couple of key parameters. * Digital Fixed Filter Bank: with FFT analysis mode and storage of settings, with presets for acoustic instruments and other effects that could be shared across a user community. Resonant settings. * Other innovative products that don't replicate features already provided in the marketplace I'd vote AGAINST: * Noise/S&H * More straightforward VCF clones * Sequencers (been done) * Digital Delays (I have all the Eventide pedals, for example) * Envelope generators (these have been done to death) * MOTM-540 Munging Decimator (complex distorting/wavewarping modules don't sell all that well anyway, I suspect) * Any CV Digital Delay, Reverb, Chorus, Phaser, Flanger, Sampler, Echo (these have been done to death and are best done "in the box" on the computer, anyway) * Traditional Fixed Filter Bank * Envelope Follower/Compressor Best regards, Roger
2010-04-26 by Jeff Laity
I'll might buy the noise module if it is affordable and 1u. Not sure about the bandpass. On Apr 26, 2010, at 8:16 AM, Paul Schreiber wrote: > So, here is you chance to tell me what *exactly* you would buy, fully assembled in SMT glory. > > I'm all ears. Analog, digital, optical, whatever. > > Paul S. > NOTICE: This electronic mail message and its contents, including any attachments hereto (collectively, "this e-mail"), is hereby designated as "confidential and proprietary." This e-mail�may be viewed and used only by the person to whom it has been sent and his/her employer�solely for the express purpose for which it has been disclosed and only in�accordance with any confidentiality or non-disclosure (or similar) agreement between TEAC Corporation or its affiliates and said employer, and may not be disclosed to any other person or entity. �
2010-04-26 by Richard Bartz
Ahoi, I share the same need with Miguel. Something which is really missing in my MOTM Rack are flexible modular effects. As example: because of the (nearly) realtime intervention my favourite reverb is the DEP-5 by Roland. I really would love to control it by CV. Or how about a Flanger/Phaser with barber pole option. Even Dieter D. has some Voltage Controlled DSP Effects like the A-187-1 module. http://www.doepfer.de/a1871.htm. I would be happy to have such MOTM modules . Richard Bartz
2010-04-26 by Richard Bartz
Same need here :-) My favourite Sampler is the Akai S612. The start/splice functionality is a dream. When I could get the possibility to control that features by CV and sending that loops through some filters hundrets of hours of pure happiness would be guaranteed ! Richard Bartz Matthew Hiscock schrieb:
> Shudder to think how much it would cost but a CV sampler would be a > dream come true. > > On 26-Apr-10, at 11:26 AM, Thomas White wrote: > >> >> CG with Expansion Module >> Morphing Terrarium >> Stereo Chorus/flanger module (you know you could do thus one proper too!) >> CV Digital Delay >> Triple Pre Amp >> CV controlled sampler (4 samples with trig in's to play, and looping >> mode controlled by analog clock input... Hey, no harm in hoping) >> High quality CV controlled Software Reverb >> >> >> Thomas White >> Natural Rhythm Music >> www.naturalrhythmmu sic.com <http://www.naturalrhythmmusic.com> >> >> On Apr 26, 2010, at 8:16 AM, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@airmail. net >> <mailto:synth1@...>> wrote: >> >>> So, here is you chance to tell me what *exactly* you would buy, fully >>> assembled in SMT glory. >>> >>> I'm all ears. Analog, digital, optical, whatever. >>> >>> Paul S. >>> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Eingehende eMail ist virenfrei. > Von AVG \ufffdberpr\ufffdft - www.avg.de > Version: 8.5.437 / Virendatenbank: 271.1.1/2834 - Ausgabedatum: 04/25/10 06:31:00 > >
2010-04-26 by Les Mizzell
> I share the same need with Miguel. Something which is > really missing in my MOTM Rack are flexible modular effects. I am intrigued by the Tip Top Audio Z-DSP: http://www.tiptopaudio.com/zdsp.php?goto=features __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5063 (20100426) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com
2010-04-26 by Miguel Mendoza
Ok, let's dream it with the first OLED touch screen module in the world! --------------------------------------------------
From: "Richard Bartz" <RICHARD@...> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 9:09 PM To: <motm@yahoogroups.com> Subject: Re: [motm] OK...so what WILL you buy assembled? > Same need here :-) My favourite Sampler is the Akai S612. The > start/splice functionality is a dream. When I could get the possibility > to control that features by CV and sending that loops through some > filters hundrets of hours of pure happiness would be guaranteed ! > > Richard Bartz > > > > Matthew Hiscock schrieb: >> Shudder to think how much it would cost but a CV sampler would be a >> dream come true. >> >> On 26-Apr-10, at 11:26 AM, Thomas White wrote: >> >>> >>> CG with Expansion Module >>> Morphing Terrarium >>> Stereo Chorus/flanger module (you know you could do thus one proper >>> too!) >>> CV Digital Delay >>> Triple Pre Amp >>> CV controlled sampler (4 samples with trig in's to play, and looping >>> mode controlled by analog clock input... Hey, no harm in hoping) >>> High quality CV controlled Software Reverb >>> >>> >>> Thomas White >>> Natural Rhythm Music >>> www.naturalrhythmmu sic.com <http://www.naturalrhythmmusic.com> >>> >>> On Apr 26, 2010, at 8:16 AM, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@airmail. net >>> <mailto:synth1@...>> wrote: >>> >>>> So, here is you chance to tell me what *exactly* you would buy, fully >>>> assembled in SMT glory. >>>> >>>> I'm all ears. Analog, digital, optical, whatever. >>>> >>>> Paul S. >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> Eingehende eMail ist virenfrei. >> Von AVG \ufffdberpr\ufffdft - www.avg.de >> Version: 8.5.437 / Virendatenbank: 271.1.1/2834 - Ausgabedatum: 04/25/10 >> 06:31:00 >> >> > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > >
2010-04-26 by m brandenberg
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Miguel Mendoza wrote: > Ok, let's dream it with the first OLED touch screen module in the world! Quiet, you, I've been trying to get that done. :-) -- Monty Brandenberg
2010-04-26 by Scott Deyo
Having cooled off from my last message, I'll start by observing that the market for modules today is significantly different from a few years back. There are now MANY formats and manufacturers to choose from, most of whom can ship with minimal lead time. I can't even count the number of "standard" modules (e.g. VCA, Noise, VCF, VCO) there are out there. To make sales a new module has to rise above the din with unique, desirable and useful features.
I applaud design decisions (i.e. alternate power connectors) that streamline 3rd-party alternate format repackaging. This obviously multiplies the size of the market for any new design. It would be best for the customers if MOTM's release of new modules were coordinated with 3rd party repackagers to make delivery (and support) in any of a variety of formats a seamless shopping experience.
I'd vote FOR:
* Cloud Generator + Expander
* Morphing Terrarium
* Digital Additive Synthesis module: Very simple envelope control of many harmonics. Maybe a "learn" mode to allow analysis of incoming audio and subsequent resynthesis. Voltage control of "chaos" in harmonic levels. Mode where multiple detuned and otherwise slightly randomized copies of the voice are output. Simple interface. Musical results.
* Physical Modeling modules: think specific models, like a "pipe" module, or a "Karplus-Strong" module with voltage control of a couple of key parameters.
* Digital Fixed Filter Bank: with FFT analysis mode and storage of settings, with presets for acoustic instruments and other effects that could be shared across a user community. Resonant settings.
* Other innovative products that don't replicate features already provided in the marketplace
I'd vote AGAINST:
* Noise/S&H
* More straightforward VCF clones
* Sequencers (been done)
* Digital Delays (I have all the Eventide pedals, for example)
* Envelope generators (these have been done to death)
* MOTM-540 Munging Decimator (complex distorting/wavewarping modules don't sell all that well anyway, I suspect)
* Any CV Digital Delay, Reverb, Chorus, Phaser, Flanger, Sampler, Echo (these have been done to death and are best done "in the box" on the computer, anyway)
* Traditional Fixed Filter Bank
* Envelope Follower/Compressor
Best regards,
Roger
2010-04-26 by jfm3
>>>>> Scott Deyo <contact@...> writes: > Your decision to concentrate on Euro is a good business decision, > and one that lots of folks are making. Euro is smaller, cheaper, has > a vastly larger market, and, really, has lower expectations to meet. > That being said, please please please stay strong in 5U. I think the > MT and CG will sell very very well. The Pulse Divider may not have > done as well because it is seen as a utility timing module, and as > such seemed like a lot of ching for utility. I doubt it will reflect > on the sales of the MT and CG at all. Couldn't have said it better myself. I can't help but think most of it is marketing. The pulse divider has more strange noise in it than any four Euro modules with messy paint jobs you care to choose. This isn't bug music by a long shot, but it should get you thinking: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oI8CkYrcJfc
2010-04-26 by Miguel Mendoza
>>>>> Scott Deyo <contact@bridechamber.com>
writes:
> Your decision to concentrate on Euro is a good business
decision,
> and one that lots of folks are making. Euro is smaller,
cheaper, has
> a vastly larger market, and, really, has lower expectations
to meet.
> That being said, please please please stay strong in 5U. I
think the
> MT and CG will sell very very well. The Pulse Divider may not
have
> done as well because it is seen as a utility timing module, and
as
> such seemed like a lot of ching for utility. I doubt it will
reflect
> on the sales of the MT and CG at all.
Couldn't have said
it better myself.
I can't help but think most of it is marketing. The
pulse divider has
more strange noise in it than any four Euro modules with
messy paint
jobs you care to choose.
This isn't bug music by a long
shot, but it should get you thinking:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oI8CkYrcJfc
2010-04-26 by Graham Atkins
I would agree with that. We have Oakley 5U in the UK and it would be nice to have an easier source of DIY / Built MOTM 5U as well. Graham
On 26 Apr 2010, at 22:36, Miguel Mendoza wrote: > > Nice demo, I never used the 730 like that. > > Speaking about marketing, I think that if MOTM 5U should have a good > distributor in Europe things would be different. Many friends of > mine freak out when they see and hear my system but they decide to > start with something 'easier' to get. > > > > From: jfm3 > Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 10:27 PM > To: MOTM List > Subject: Re: [motm] Re: OK...so what WILL you buy assembled? > > > >>>>> Scott Deyo <contact@bridechamber.com> writes: > > > Your decision to concentrate on Euro is a good business decision, > > and one that lots of folks are making. Euro is smaller, cheaper, has > > a vastly larger market, and, really, has lower expectations to meet. > > That being said, please please please stay strong in 5U. I think the > > MT and CG will sell very very well. The Pulse Divider may not have > > done as well because it is seen as a utility timing module, and as > > such seemed like a lot of ching for utility. I doubt it will reflect > > on the sales of the MT and CG at all. > > Couldn't have said it better myself. > > I can't help but think most of it is marketing. The pulse divider has > more strange noise in it than any four Euro modules with messy paint > jobs you care to choose. > > This isn't bug music by a long shot, but it should get you thinking: > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oI8CkYrcJfc > > >
2010-04-27 by Richard Brewster
I'm in for the announced modules : 102 Digital Noise Sample & Hold, Cloud Generator (not expansion, though), Morphing Terrarium. Not much interested in more filters. -Richard Brewster http://pugix.com
On 4/26/10 11:16 AM, Paul Schreiber wrote: > So, here is you chance to tell me what *exactly* you would buy, fully > assembled in SMT glory. > > I'm all ears. Analog, digital, optical, whatever. > > Paul S. > > >
2010-04-27 by John Loffink
Stereo/Panning VCAs and VC (complex) envelopes. Bunches of them. John Loffink Paul Schreiber wrote:
> So, here is you chance to tell me what *exactly* you would buy, fully > assembled in SMT glory. > > I'm all ears. Analog, digital, optical, whatever. > > Paul S. > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > >
2010-04-27 by Greg James
Not necessarily in priority order: Cloud Generator with Expander Triple Pre-Amp VCA with Pan/Fade Bi-Phase Clone Sequencer Matrix-12 VCF Morphing Terrarium Additive Synthesis sound sources Physical Modeling sound sources I'd also be interested in any super-duper exotic CV-oriented modules (as has been alluded to by others). This is an idea I've been noodling on for some time now (Paul knows why): I would like to retro-fit my modules with add-on kits to normal my system. I'm envisioning something like daughterboards along with new switching jacks that could be substituted for the standard jacks. Think of Pot Chicklets on steroids. Then, with modular wiring inside the cabinet, I can set up whatever normalled configuration I want. Since it's configurable, it can be changed to suit my tastes as time goes by (and by, and by). In my situation I also need a way to bus the normalling to several cases. And voilla! The badest ARP 2600 in the universe. I guess my point here is: there can be lots more to these modulars than just the modules we tend to think of. -Greg
-----Original Message----- From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Schreiber Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 11:17 AM To: MOTM List Subject: [motm] OK...so what WILL you buy assembled? So, here is you chance to tell me what *exactly* you would buy, fully assembled in SMT glory. I'm all ears. Analog, digital, optical, whatever. Paul S. ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links
2010-04-27 by Greg James
One more thing - Do it up right with a processor based switchboard on a 5U panel in the front, and you'd never have to go into the guts to change the normalling... Greg (going to bed now...)
-----Original Message----- From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Greg James Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 11:18 PM To: 'Paul Schreiber'; 'MOTM List' Subject: [motm] Wish list and normalling - was OK...so what WILL you buy assembled? Not necessarily in priority order: Cloud Generator with Expander Triple Pre-Amp VCA with Pan/Fade Bi-Phase Clone Sequencer Matrix-12 VCF Morphing Terrarium Additive Synthesis sound sources Physical Modeling sound sources I'd also be interested in any super-duper exotic CV-oriented modules (as has been alluded to by others). This is an idea I've been noodling on for some time now (Paul knows why): I would like to retro-fit my modules with add-on kits to normal my system. I'm envisioning something like daughterboards along with new switching jacks that could be substituted for the standard jacks. Think of Pot Chicklets on steroids. Then, with modular wiring inside the cabinet, I can set up whatever normalled configuration I want. Since it's configurable, it can be changed to suit my tastes as time goes by (and by, and by). In my situation I also need a way to bus the normalling to several cases. And voilla! The badest ARP 2600 in the universe. I guess my point here is: there can be lots more to these modulars than just the modules we tend to think of. -Greg -----Original Message----- From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Schreiber Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 11:17 AM To: MOTM List Subject: [motm] OK...so what WILL you buy assembled? So, here is you chance to tell me what *exactly* you would buy, fully assembled in SMT glory. I'm all ears. Analog, digital, optical, whatever. Paul S. ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links
2010-04-27 by Paul Schreiber
> I would like to retro-fit my modules with add-on kits to normal my system. > I'm envisioning something like daughterboards along with new switching > jacks > that could be substituted for the standard jacks. Think of Pot Chicklets > on > steroids. The easiest way to do this is get the Switchraft vertical, pc board mounted switching jacks: part # 112APCX and then make a 2 row x 4 jack board (like what I do on the MOTM-910 mults now). But if you want to leave the output alone and just "selectively" switch certain jacks then a steroid chicklet with this jack might be the ticket. Paging John Loffink...... All the current MOTM jacks are switchable/can be normalled. Some modules (like the MOTM-410) use the switched circuit to "clever ends". Paul S.
2010-04-27 by John Loffink
Believe it or not I've actually thought a lot about the normalling over the last few years, as well as "enhancements" or programmability. There is never enough time, unfortunately... John Loffink Paul Schreiber wrote:
>> I would like to retro-fit my modules with add-on kits to normal my system. >> I'm envisioning something like daughterboards along with new switching >> jacks >> that could be substituted for the standard jacks. Think of Pot Chicklets >> on >> steroids. >> > > The easiest way to do this is get the Switchraft vertical, pc board mounted > switching jacks: part # 112APCX and then make a 2 row x 4 jack board (like > what I do on the MOTM-910 mults now). But if you want to leave the output > alone and just "selectively" switch certain jacks then a steroid chicklet > with this jack might be the ticket. Paging John Loffink...... > > All the current MOTM jacks are switchable/can be normalled. > > Some modules (like the MOTM-410) use the switched circuit to "clever ends". > > Paul S. > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > >
2010-04-27 by John L Rice
Thanks guys! J John L Rice
From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Miguel Mendoza Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 2:37 PM To: MOTM List Subject: Re: [motm] Re: OK...so what WILL you buy assembled? Nice demo, I never used the 730 like that. From: jfm3 <mailto:jfm3@...> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 10:27 PM To: MOTM <mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com> List Subject: Re: [motm] Re: OK...so what WILL you buy assembled? I can't help but think most of it is marketing. The pulse divider has more strange noise in it than any four Euro modules with messy paint jobs you care to choose. This isn't bug music by a long shot, but it should get you thinking: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oI8CkYrcJfc
2010-04-27 by John L Rice
Thanks for asking for opinions Paul and thanks for the archived list George! ;-) Kit, prebuilt SMT or even grown in dirt (so long as I don't have to water it! ;-) is fine with me. Most of the stuff on the list sounds cool and interesting to me! I'm especially interested in sequencers, arpeggiators, anything clockable, triggerable, or manipulates clocks! I like filters and sound sources too! Heh! I want the little BPF! AND WHAT THE FREAKIN' HELL IS THE DoMOAS (Daughter of Mother of all Sequencers)???????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! We never sees it, but we wantses its! (sounds precious!!!!!!!!!!) And the MOTM-550 Rhythm Wheel (Seq/ASR/S&H w/pattern gen) too! Man! Make me one please! John L Rice
From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of groovyshaman Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 9:31 AM To: MOTM List; Paul Schreiber Subject: Re: [motm] OK...so what WILL you buy assembled? Ok I found my master list. Seems every year or so I need to republish a revised version. :) SMT pre-built I'd buy: Morphing Terrarium MOTM-102 Noise/ASR MOTM-520 Cloud Generator w/521 MOTM-530 Envelope Nest (bizarre EG) MOTM-540 Munging Decimator (VC bit-rate reduction) MOTM-550 Rhythm Wheel (Seq/ASR/S&H w/pattern gen) Any CV Digital Delay, Reverb, Chorus, Phaser, Flanger, Sampler, Echo Old but likely resurrect-able in SMT that I'd buy: MOTM-125 Pulse Width Multiplier Dual 10000ms Delay (discussed 8/19/00) DoMOAS (Daughter of Mother of all Sequencers) VC Phase Shifter Synthtech Vocoder Died a horrible death - that I wanted to buy (sigh): MOTM-130 Dual Pan/Fade VCA (so close!) MOTM-180 Triple Preamp MOTM-450 Fixed Filter Bank (ugh) MOTM-460 ARP 2600-4072 VCF MOTM-470 SEM VCF w/morphing output MOTM-600 uSequencer (double ugh) MOTM-810 JH's VC EG MOTM-840 Envelope Follower/Compressor MOTM-880 VC Filter Envelope Generator (CS-80) Matrix-12 15-Mode VCF Bi-Phase Clone Joystick Interface Random Vibrato Source (discussed 11/23/00) George --- On Mon, 4/26/10, groovyshaman <groovyshaman@...> wrote: From: groovyshaman <groovyshaman@...> Subject: Re: [motm] OK...so what WILL you buy assembled? To: "MOTM List" <motm@yahoogroups.com>, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...> Date: Monday, April 26, 2010, 11:58 AM Morphing Terrarium Cloud Generator w/expansion module Rhythm Wheel SEM Filter Full Featured MOTM Sequencer - MOAS or DOMOAS Any CV Digital Delay / Reverb / Chorus / Phaser / Flanger / Sampler / Echo There might have been a few other cool MOTM-500 series planned way back but I can't remember them all right now. I'd include MOTM-450 but looks like JH may have that taken care of. George --- On Mon, 4/26/10, Paul Schreiber <synth1@...> wrote: From: Paul Schreiber <synth1@...> Subject: [motm] OK...so what WILL you buy assembled? To: "MOTM List" <motm@yahoogroups.com> Date: Monday, April 26, 2010, 11:16 AM So, here is you chance to tell me what *exactly* you would buy, fully assembled in SMT glory. I'm all ears. Analog, digital, optical, whatever. Paul S. ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links
2010-04-27 by groovyshaman
Jeeze I have not seen this much list traffic in years. Yea John, the list of modules that have been discussed is pretty extensive, and many made it much further but still never saw the light of day, alas. Of course I kept track of the potential upcoming modules because, like crack, you must manage your money wisely or you'll miss out. :) Re DoMOAS, check back in the archives towards the beginning I believe there may be some discussion. In the end it became a collection of modules to build up your own sequencer with functional units separated out. Stooge Moe at hotrodmotm.com took it to heart and came up with some interesting designs, he may offer more insight. George --- On Tue, 4/27/10, John L Rice <Drummer@ImJohn.com> wrote:
From: John L Rice <Drummer@...>
Subject: RE: [motm] OK...so what WILL you buy assembled?
To: "'MOTM List'" <motm@yahoogroups.com>, "'Paul Schreiber'" <synth1@...>
Date: Tuesday, April 27, 2010, 3:48 AM
Thanks for asking for opinions Paul and thanks for the archived list
George! ;-)
Kit, prebuilt SMT or even grown in dirt (so long as I don’t
have to water it! ;-) is fine with me.
Most of the stuff on the list sounds cool and interesting to me!
I’m especially interested in sequencers, arpeggiators, anything clockable,
triggerable, or manipulates clocks! I like filters and sound sources too! Heh!
I want the little BPF! AND WHAT THE FREAKIN’ HELL IS THE DoMOAS
(Daughter of Mother of all Sequencers)???????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
We never sees it, but we wantses its! (sounds precious!!!!!!!!!!) And the MOTM-550
Rhythm Wheel (Seq/ASR/S&H w/pattern gen) too! Man! Make me one please!
John L Rice
From:
motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@...m] On Behalf Of groovyshaman
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 9:31 AM
To: MOTM List; Paul Schreiber
Subject: Re: [motm] OK...so what WILL you buy assembled?
Ok I found my master list. Seems every year or so I
need to republish a revised version. :)
SMT pre-built I'd buy:
Morphing Terrarium
MOTM-102 Noise/ASR
MOTM-520 Cloud Generator w/521
MOTM-530 Envelope Nest (bizarre EG)
MOTM-540 Munging Decimator (VC bit-rate reduction)
MOTM-550 Rhythm Wheel (Seq/ASR/S&H w/pattern gen)
Any CV Digital Delay, Reverb, Chorus, Phaser, Flanger, Sampler, Echo
Old but likely resurrect-able in SMT that I'd buy:
MOTM-125 Pulse Width Multiplier
Dual 10000ms Delay (discussed 8/19/00)
DoMOAS (Daughter of Mother of all Sequencers)
VC Phase Shifter
Synthtech Vocoder
Died a horrible death - that I wanted to buy (sigh):
MOTM-130 Dual Pan/Fade VCA (so close!)
MOTM-180 Triple Preamp
MOTM-450 Fixed Filter Bank (ugh)
MOTM-460 ARP 2600-4072 VCF
MOTM-470 SEM VCF w/morphing output
MOTM-600 uSequencer (double ugh)
MOTM-810 JH's VC EG
MOTM-840 Envelope Follower/Compressor
MOTM-880 VC Filter Envelope Generator (CS-80)
Matrix-12 15-Mode VCF
Bi-Phase Clone
Joystick Interface
Random Vibrato Source (discussed 11/23/00)
George
--- On Mon, 4/26/10, groovyshaman <groovyshaman@...>
wrote:
From: groovyshaman <groovyshaman@...>
Subject: Re: [motm] OK...so what WILL you buy assembled?
To: "MOTM List" <motm@yahoogroups.com>, "Paul
Schreiber" <synth1@...>
Date: Monday, April 26, 2010, 11:58 AM
Morphing Terrarium
Cloud Generator w/expansion module
Rhythm Wheel
SEM Filter
Full Featured MOTM Sequencer - MOAS or DOMOAS
Any CV Digital Delay / Reverb / Chorus / Phaser / Flanger / Sampler / Echo
There might have been a few other cool MOTM-500 series planned way back but
I can't remember them all right now.
I'd include MOTM-450 but looks like JH may have that taken care of.
George
--- On Mon, 4/26/10, Paul Schreiber <synth1@...>
wrote:
From: Paul Schreiber <synth1@...>
Subject: [motm] OK...so what WILL you buy assembled?
To: "MOTM List" <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Monday, April 26, 2010, 11:16 AM
So, here is you chance to
tell me what *exactly* you would buy, fully
assembled in SMT glory.
I'm all ears. Analog, digital, optical, whatever.
Paul S.
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/motm/
Individual Email | Traditional
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/motm/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
motm-digest@yahoogroups.com
motm-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
motm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/2010-04-27 by groovyshaman
Actually I should correct myself re Moe's work. (My brain cannot keep things straight after 5 minutes let alone 5+ years.) Inspired from list discussions, and the fact that a MOTM analog sequencer did not materialize, he came up with his own designs called SuperMoe. You can see it on his site. It's quite impressive. George --- On Tue, 4/27/10, groovyshaman <groovyshaman@...> wrote:
From: groovyshaman <groovyshaman@snet.net>
Subject: RE: [motm] OK...so what WILL you buy assembled?
To: "'MOTM List'" <motm@yahoogroups.com>, "John L Rice" <Drummer@...>
Date: Tuesday, April 27, 2010, 10:34 AM
Jeeze I have not seen this much list traffic in years. Yea John, the list of modules that have been discussed is pretty extensive, and many made it much further but still never saw the light of day, alas. Of course I kept track of the potential upcoming modules because, like crack, you must manage your money wisely or you'll miss out. :) Re DoMOAS, check back in the archives towards the beginning I believe there may be some discussion. In the end it became a collection of modules to build up your own sequencer with functional units separated out. Stooge Moe at hotrodmotm.com took it to heart and came up with some interesting designs, he may offer more insight.
George
--- On Tue, 4/27/10, John L Rice <Drummer@ImJohn.com> wrote:
From: John L Rice <Drummer@...>
Subject: RE: [motm] OK...so what WILL you buy assembled?
To: "'MOTM List'" <motm@...m>, "'Paul Schreiber'" <synth1@...>
Date: Tuesday, April 27, 2010, 3:48 AM
Thanks for asking for opinions Paul and thanks for the archived list
George! ;-)
Kit, prebuilt SMT or even grown in dirt (so long as I don’t
have to water it! ;-) is fine with me.
Most of the stuff on the list sounds cool and interesting to me!
I’m especially interested in sequencers, arpeggiators, anything clockable,
triggerable, or manipulates clocks! I like filters and sound sources too! Heh!
I want the little BPF! AND WHAT THE FREAKIN’ HELL IS THE DoMOAS
(Daughter of Mother of all Sequencers)???????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
We never sees it, but we wantses its! (sounds precious!!!!!!!!!!) And the MOTM-550
Rhythm Wheel (Seq/ASR/S&H w/pattern gen) too! Man! Make me one please!
John L Rice
From:
motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of groovyshaman
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 9:31 AM
To: MOTM List; Paul Schreiber
Subject: Re: [motm] OK...so what WILL you buy assembled?
Ok I found my master list. Seems every year or so I
need to republish a revised version. :)
SMT pre-built I'd buy:
Morphing Terrarium
MOTM-102 Noise/ASR
MOTM-520 Cloud Generator w/521
MOTM-530 Envelope Nest (bizarre EG)
MOTM-540 Munging Decimator (VC bit-rate reduction)
MOTM-550 Rhythm Wheel (Seq/ASR/S&H w/pattern gen)
Any CV Digital Delay, Reverb, Chorus, Phaser, Flanger, Sampler, Echo
Old but likely resurrect-able in SMT that I'd buy:
MOTM-125 Pulse Width Multiplier
Dual 10000ms Delay (discussed 8/19/00)
DoMOAS (Daughter of Mother of all Sequencers)
VC Phase Shifter
Synthtech Vocoder
Died a horrible death - that I wanted to buy (sigh):
MOTM-130 Dual Pan/Fade VCA (so close!)
MOTM-180 Triple Preamp
MOTM-450 Fixed Filter Bank (ugh)
MOTM-460 ARP 2600-4072 VCF
MOTM-470 SEM VCF w/morphing output
MOTM-600 uSequencer (double ugh)
MOTM-810 JH's VC EG
MOTM-840 Envelope Follower/Compressor
MOTM-880 VC Filter Envelope Generator (CS-80)
Matrix-12 15-Mode VCF
Bi-Phase Clone
Joystick Interface
Random Vibrato Source (discussed 11/23/00)
George
--- On Mon, 4/26/10, groovyshaman <groovyshaman@...>
wrote:
From: groovyshaman <groovyshaman@...>
Subject: Re: [motm] OK...so what WILL you buy assembled?
To: "MOTM List" <motm@yahoogroups.com>, "Paul
Schreiber" <synth1@...>
Date: Monday, April 26, 2010, 11:58 AM
Morphing Terrarium
Cloud Generator w/expansion module
Rhythm Wheel
SEM Filter
Full Featured MOTM Sequencer - MOAS or DOMOAS
Any CV Digital Delay / Reverb / Chorus / Phaser / Flanger / Sampler / Echo
There might have been a few other cool MOTM-500 series planned way back but
I can't remember them all right now.
I'd include MOTM-450 but looks like JH may have that taken care of.
George
--- On Mon, 4/26/10, Paul Schreiber <synth1@...>
wrote:
From: Paul Schreiber <synth1@...>
Subject: [motm] OK...so what WILL you buy assembled?
To: "MOTM List" <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Monday, April 26, 2010, 11:16 AM
So, here is you chance to
tell me what *exactly* you would buy, fully
assembled in SMT glory.
I'm all ears. Analog, digital, optical, whatever.
Paul S.
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/motm/
Individual Email | Traditional
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/motm/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
motm-digest@yahoogroups.com
motm-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
motm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/2010-04-27 by Chris Parker
WOW!!! I check my email and it looks like the good old days when Larry was with us! It\u03357;s great to see some traffic again!
As a longtime 5U MOTMer, I have to say that I will buy at least one of any MOTM digital module and at least two of any MOTM analog modules. This has been my pattern forever and I see no reason to change it now.
That being said, I REALLY,REALLY would like to see the following done to MOTM standards:
Triple PreAmp (need at least two, either analog or digital)
Envelope Follower/Compressor (also need at least two, either analog or digital)
Fixed Filter Bank
Dual VCA/Pan/Fade
-Chris-
From:
motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul
Schreiber
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 10:30 PM
To: gjames@...; 'MOTM List'
Subject: Re: [motm] Wish list and normalling - was OK...so what WILL you
buy assembled?
> I would like to retro-fit my modules with
add-on kits to normal my system.
> I'm envisioning something like daughterboards along with new switching
> jacks
> that could be substituted for the standard jacks. Think of Pot Chicklets
> on
> steroids.
The easiest way to do this is get the Switchraft vertical, pc board mounted
switching jacks: part # 112APCX and then make a 2 row x 4 jack board (like
what I do on the MOTM-910 mults now). But if you want to leave the output
alone and just "selectively" switch certain jacks then a steroid
chicklet
with this jack might be the ticket. Paging John Loffink......
All the current MOTM jacks are switchable/can be normalled.
Some modules (like the MOTM-410) use the switched circuit to "clever
ends".
Paul S.
2010-04-27 by James Elliott
1) Digital Delay/Sampler 2) Stereo/Panning VCA's 3) Modulation Sources..... ________________________________ From: John Loffink <jloffink@austin.rr.com> To: Paul Schreiber <synth1@...> Cc: MOTM List <motm@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Mon, April 26, 2010 8:59:30 PM Subject: Re: [motm] OK...so what WILL you buy assembled? Stereo/Panning VCAs and VC (complex) envelopes. Bunches of them. John Loffink Paul Schreiber wrote:
> So, here is you chance to tell me what *exactly* you would buy, fully > assembled in SMT glory. > > I'm all ears. Analog, digital, optical, whatever. > > Paul S. > > > > ------------ --------- --------- ------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > >
2010-04-27 by Jim "synchro1" W
2010-04-27 by Tom Adam
Just wondering... What's so special about the Stereo panning VCA's? When I want to achieve this, I use 2 VCA's, an inverter module (part of the MOTM-410 OMS oakley thingie) and a CV. Or when just having fun, I use a MOTM-700... Come to think of it, there are several ways to achieve this. What feature makes this a much wanted module? What am I missing? Why would I put it on my want list knowing Paul has "limited time" for releasing new stuff? If it's just the matter of the 'amount of modules' used, expand your system. Paul would love to sell you some more VCA's/EG's or LFO's ;-) James Elliott schreef: > 2) Stereo/Panning VCA's > > > Cheers, -- ToAd Tom.Adam@... www.thebigear.be
2010-04-27 by IvanCU2
Beyond normalling; how about using one of these? http://www.cmlabs.net/sixtyfour.html Just need the same thing for control voltages and gates and you'd be all set... Ivan
2010-04-27 by rogerpellegrini
I feel compelled to mention an important flaw with this poll. The potential market for MOTM product can be thought of in a lot of different ways. One way to look at it is to divide it into two groups: (A) MOTM die-hards: Comprised mostly of those who built modules from kits, this group would like to see a broad variety of modules to complete their MOTM system. Modules that would allow them to perform functions that other modulars also perform (eg sequencers, envelope followers, preamps, etc). This group is also likely to vote for putting choruses, delays, etc., into MOTM format for completeness, although these are also available elsewhere. This is a shrinking group, not a growing group, because in the last few years it has been increasingly difficult to purchase enough modules to create a complete system that might attract the new customer. (B) Everyone else who is interested in modulars: They'd like to see something that's not available elsewhere, because if it is available elsewhere, they've already got one. They may or may not need the module in MOTM 5U format. They probably don't want to touch a soldering iron. They likely expect timely delivery. This poll, like others before it, will draw largely from group (A). Group (B), though a much larger potential market, is not well represented. Reliance on polls like this results in business decisions to keep making hopelessly labor intensive kits or variations on utility or redundant modules that will sell in smaller and smaller numbers. Here's an example: Paul S. wrote: >Modcan has a CV recorder already, 57B. It's $700. >I think Eric & I could do a better one for $499. Are those Modcan 57B's flying off the shelves? What unsatisfied demand would be uncovered by the cost savings? This might satisfy some group A members, but would not be a money making project. Likewise, the Noise/S&H module and the 1U BPF filter could only target group A and will not sell well. Sorry to be so negative, Roger
2010-04-27 by Paul Schreiber
> > Likewise, the Noise/S&H module and the 1U BPF filter could only target > group A and will not sell well. > > Sorry to be so negative, > Roger OK! I agree 100% about the 2 groups. This sort of dawned on me a few days ago whilst walking the doggie. I have people with 50+ modules that need X but newbies just starting out looking for Y or even Z. So, knowing all of this, the next 2 modules (not the CG, '102 or MT) I should make are ......???????? Paul S.
2010-04-27 by Miguel Mendoza
>
> Likewise, the Noise/S&H module and the 1U BPF filter could
only target
> group A and will not sell well.
>
> Sorry to be
so negative,
> Roger
OK! I agree 100% about the 2 groups. This sort
of dawned on me a few days
ago whilst walking the doggie.
I have people
with 50+ modules that need X but newbies just starting out
looking for Y or
even Z.
So, knowing all of this, the next 2 modules (not the CG, '102 or
MT) I
should make are ......????????
Paul S.
2010-04-27 by Joe Miklojcik
DISCLAIMER: I am often wrong, especially about sales and marketing :)
I am also ranty sometimes and apparently incapable of using a smiley
correctly.
>>>>> Paul Schreiber <synth1@...> writes:
> So, knowing all of this, the next 2 modules (not the CG, '102 or MT)
> I should make are ......????????
If you want new buyers:
MOTM "Mercury", available as a turn-key system, all modules
assembled, calibrated, tested, and signed off by the Paul
4 weeks to delivery at an absolute absolute absolute maximum
this is the main thing that will get you new buyers
right now people go "hey maybe MOTM.. wait 2.0 what? ... maybe dotcom then"
problem of course is then you have to build a pile and hope people buy them
at that point you may as well hunt down a business person and make a go of this as a day job
10U EWI Tourcase, two pairs Rails, mounting h/w, extras
patch cables
950 that mounts in the back somehow, power distro w/ all three kinds of headers power cables
One Moog Voyager's worth of modules
must include a 650 and a 440
SMT versions of everything are 100% okay
especially if they cut lead time
It only must continue to sound awesome and impress any analog fetishist
leave room for 2U or so to fill in later
Better manuals with assembly instructions moved to the back,
more patch examples
calibration instructions
DVD of celebrities explaining/playing MOTM
Include flyers from Oakley, Blacet, Modcan, Bridechamber, Metasonix, Hordijk,
and every other legitimate 5U format vendor
by 5U I mean I can put it on MOTM rails, get it powered from a 950 modulo a special cable, and put/get reasonable signals in/out
by legitimate I mean that the stuff actually works and can be bought assembled
(okay so Blacet and Metasonix don't do 5U any more, maybe not them then)
Also offer a much larger "Saturn", made to order, explicit long lead time.
Keyboard "magazine" and other Glen Becks of the music technology
"industry" will reivew the Mercury (because in point of fact nothing
interesting enough to sell more magazines has happened in their world
in a decade or more), you'll probably get 10 or so new users from
that. You'd need a person who has actually studied business and
operations research to predict how many of these you need to have in
the pipe before you announce it. Delivery time is probably the
dominant factor for all this.
For those of us who have 50+ modules and consider soldering a
therapeutic activity, I'd say see the lists of modules produced by
long-time MOTM fans that have been put on this Yahoo group. Maybe if
you think Oakley, Modcan, or whoever has done a quality job of making
something from such a list, you can strike that, but yeah.
Maybe see if you can get sales figures from Bridechamber, Modcan, Todd
Fletcher, Oakley, KRISP-ONE, etc., and see if you can all derive some
mutual benefit from attempting to foment a 5U renaissance. There's a
whole nascent ecosystem of 5U suppliers out there. They probably have
a very clear picture of what your next two modules should be.
Want more die-hards? Get some of us to host 5Ucon here in lovely
Piscataway New Jersey, where all 5U people of the world will meet up,
make the world's largest patch, show off the world's most incredible
systems in a large common room (locked and guarded at night), see
performances in a separate room with a stage and seating,
buy/sell/swap modules, drink expensive beer with 5U using
semi-celebrities, and donate $100 to the Bob Moog foundation for each
swing they get to take at some old Doepfer gear with a sledge hammer.
There will also be soldering. And beer.2010-04-28 by Jason Proctor
i think the 102 does sound interesting, because AFAIK there isn't a S&H + ASR combo currently available (the CGS ASR won't act like a straight S&H). ideally it would have individual lag between the stages, and at least one stage would have a comparator output with a pot for threshold. i've been kinda missing my departed Oakley S&H and i might buy a 102. i was going to go off on there being no point to taking polls on the list if the result is the 102 and a new bandpass, neither of which polled highly IIRC. unless the bandpass is the SEM filter in a beard and funny hat :-) hard to poll group B if only group A is around taking part in the discussion. perchance should we do a call to arms on other lists asking for MOTM suggestions?
2010-04-28 by Jason Proctor
PS it would be nice if the 102 triggered on the clock's rising edge. the 101 did it the other way, making sync with other clocked modules effectively impossible.
2010-04-28 by Jim Black
Morphing Terrarium Cloud GeneratorAnything that takes input clock to use in conjunction w/ 730. I second the notion of better manuals/tutorials. The 730 Robert Rich video, while semi-informative... was not applicable - who has the modules to trigger 5 separate sequences?? --- On Mon, 4/26/10, Paul Schreiber <synth1@...> wrote:
From: Paul Schreiber <synth1@...>
Subject: [motm] OK...so what WILL you buy assembled?
To: "MOTM List" <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Monday, April 26, 2010, 11:16 AM
So, here is you chance to tell me what *exactly* you would buy, fully
assembled in SMT glory.
I'm all ears. Analog, digital, optical, whatever.
Paul S.2010-04-28 by Richard Brewster
My 101 now sports a clock polarity switch. Yes, it lost some features as well. Probably my most insane conversion: http://pugix.com/synth/motm-101-noise-sample-hold-dual-oakley-sample-hold/ One reason I am interested in the 102 is that I packed three sample and holds into a 2U module, and I'd like to have a 1U single unit to put into a portable cabinet. I'm not interested in more Oakley S&H, nice as they are. The 102 sound like just the right feature set. As for going digital, the Modcan Quad Envelope and Quad LFO are an interesting approach to putting a lot of function in a compact space. That sort of module, but in 1U size if possible. The 3/4" UEG-style knobs <shudder> are fine with me. Richard Brewster (A or B customer? I don't know which.)
On 4/27/10 8:31 PM, Jason Proctor wrote: > PS it would be nice if the 102 triggered on the clock's rising edge. > the 101 did it the other way, making sync with other clocked modules > effectively impossible. > > > >
2010-04-28 by Richard Brewster
Compactness is probably the main reason. It's true that panning can be patched easily, and in different ways. It doesn't seem that interesting to me any more. My DIY synth built in 1980 had panning VCAs and I grossly overused them. Richard Brewster
On 4/27/10 4:10 PM, Tom Adam wrote: > Just wondering... > What's so special about the Stereo panning VCA's? > When I want to achieve this, I use 2 VCA's, an inverter module (part of > the MOTM-410 OMS oakley thingie) and a CV. > Or when just having fun, I use a MOTM-700... > Come to think of it, there are several ways to achieve this. > > What feature makes this a much wanted module? What am I missing? > Why would I put it on my want list knowing Paul has "limited time" for > releasing new stuff? > > If it's just the matter of the 'amount of modules' used, expand your > system. Paul would love to sell you some more VCA's/EG's or LFO's ;-) > > James Elliott schreef: > >> 2) Stereo/Panning VCA's >> >> >> >> > Cheers, > >
2010-04-28 by James Elliott
Why get a lag processor when you can use a filter? Why get a modular distortion unit when you can use guitar pedals? Why buy wave shapers when you can just mix an infinite amount of oscillator outputs together? Why oh why use 'this' instead of 'that'? I personally think it would be nice to have one module that fades between two sources by means of one (or two) control voltages across one or more outputs without the need for multiple separate VCA's and inverter modules. And the 700 does not achieve what I am seeking, it is a discreet switch, not a cross fader. I don't think this request is that far fetched considering Paul had mentioned in the past that he was going to build one. I imagine it must have been requested by a few people for him to even consider it. I don't think questioning each other's desires will help Paul in his decision making as there will be at least one person who says, "I don't think you should release more filters" for each person who says they want another one. Same with sequencers, envelope generators, etc. Maybe a poll followed by a feature wishlist would be more useful? -Jim ________________________________
From: Tom Adam <tom.adam@...> To: MOTM List <motm@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tue, April 27, 2010 3:10:05 PM Subject: Panning VCA's was: [motm] OK...so what WILL you buy assembled? Just wondering... What's so special about the Stereo panning VCA's? When I want to achieve this, I use 2 VCA's, an inverter module (part of the MOTM-410 OMS oakley thingie) and a CV. Or when just having fun, I use a MOTM-700... Come to think of it, there are several ways to achieve this. What feature makes this a much wanted module? What am I missing? Why would I put it on my want list knowing Paul has "limited time" for releasing new stuff? If it's just the matter of the 'amount of modules' used, expand your system. Paul would love to sell you some more VCA's/EG's or LFO's ;-) James Elliott schreef: > 2) Stereo/Panning VCA's > > > Cheers, -- ToAd Tom.Adam@thebigear. be www.thebigear. be
2010-04-28 by John L Rice
Hhhmm, I actually disagree with you Roger, although it was an interesting and thought provoking read! ;-) In my opinion, there are very few things that are that black and white and you seem to be making some very definitive statements without any data from solid research to back it up. (at least as far as I know, since I don't know you at all ;-) Saying everyone only fits into one or the other group is . .well . . . a surprising statement to say the least. :-( John L Rice
> -----Original Message----- > From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of > rogerpellegrini > Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 2:48 PM > To: motm@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [motm] Re: Wish list and normalling - was OK...so what WILL > you buy assembled? > > I feel compelled to mention an important flaw with this poll. The > potential market for MOTM product can be thought of in a lot of > different ways. One way to look at it is to divide it into two groups: > > (A) MOTM die-hards: Comprised mostly of those who built modules from > kits, this group would like to see a broad variety of modules to > complete their MOTM system. Modules that would allow them to perform > functions that other modulars also perform (eg sequencers, envelope > followers, preamps, etc). This group is also likely to vote for > putting choruses, delays, etc., into MOTM format for completeness, > although these are also available elsewhere. This is a shrinking > group, not a growing group, because in the last few years it has been > increasingly difficult to purchase enough modules to create a complete > system that might attract the new customer. > > (B) Everyone else who is interested in modulars: They'd like to see > something that's not available elsewhere, because if it is available > elsewhere, they've already got one. They may or may not need the > module in MOTM 5U format. They probably don't want to touch a > soldering iron. They likely expect timely delivery. > > This poll, like others before it, will draw largely from group (A). > Group (B), though a much larger potential market, is not well > represented. > > Reliance on polls like this results in business decisions to keep > making hopelessly labor intensive kits or variations on utility or > redundant modules that will sell in smaller and smaller numbers. > > Here's an example: > Paul S. wrote: > >Modcan has a CV recorder already, 57B. It's $700. > >I think Eric & I could do a better one for $499. > > Are those Modcan 57B's flying off the shelves? What unsatisfied demand > would be uncovered by the cost savings? This might satisfy some group > A members, but would not be a money making project. > > Likewise, the Noise/S&H module and the 1U BPF filter could only target > group A and will not sell well. > > Sorry to be so negative, > Roger > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
2010-04-28 by wjhall11
You know, James, your desire for a panning output thing is something Will and I sympathize with and have been pursuing. I think YUsynth newly has a big one. Am I recalling that CGS has a version? So saying, there may be limited demand for one from Paul. But your point's well taken - I don't mean to be advising Paul not to invent one... we're coming late to this thread, and as Will and I discuss it, we find ourselves more interested in things we couldn't build ourselves or get elsewhere. And we thought maybe you hadn't seen Yves' new gadget. Bill (and Will) --- In motm@...m, James Elliott <johans121@...> wrote:
> > Why get a lag processor when you can use a filter? Why get a modular distortion unit when you can use guitar pedals? Why buy wave shapers when you can just mix an infinite amount of oscillator outputs together? Why oh why use 'this' instead of 'that'? I personally think it would be nice to have one module that fades between two sources by means of one (or two) control voltages across one or more outputs without the need for multiple separate VCA's and inverter modules. And the 700 does not achieve what I am seeking, it is a discreet switch, not a cross fader. I don't think this request is that far fetched considering Paul had mentioned in the past that he was going to build one. I imagine it must have been requested by a few people for him to even consider it. > > I don't think questioning each other's desires will help Paul in his decision making as there will be at least one person who says, "I don't think you should release more filters" for each person who says they want another one. Same with sequencers, envelope generators, etc. Maybe a poll followed by a feature wishlist would be more useful? > > -Jim > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Tom Adam <tom.adam@...> > To: MOTM List <motm@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Tue, April 27, 2010 3:10:05 PM > Subject: Panning VCA's was: [motm] OK...so what WILL you buy assembled? > > > Just wondering... > What's so special about the Stereo panning VCA's? > When I want to achieve this, I use 2 VCA's, an inverter module (part of > the MOTM-410 OMS oakley thingie) and a CV. > Or when just having fun, I use a MOTM-700... > Come to think of it, there are several ways to achieve this. > > What feature makes this a much wanted module? What am I missing? > Why would I put it on my want list knowing Paul has "limited time" for > releasing new stuff? > > If it's just the matter of the 'amount of modules' used, expand your > system. Paul would love to sell you some more VCA's/EG's or LFO's ;-) > > James Elliott schreef: > > 2) Stereo/Panning VCA's > > > > > > > Cheers, > > -- > ToAd > Tom.Adam@thebigear. be > www.thebigear. be >
2010-04-28 by wjhall11
Yes - so the question was "what will we buy assembled?" And Will and I are obviously in group A. So whereas group B people will necessarily answer "everything" we'll answer "stuff we can't build ourselves and can't get elsewhere." Therefore, we're most interested in Paul spending R&D time creating unique things - Cloud Generator, Morphizzle Whachamacallit <G>, etc. And we'll buy them assembled if they're over our heads or if they're not offered in 2.0 form. PS - Will says that angels cringe at digital - they only listen to vinyl (not CDs) - but we'll buy a Morphy Whachadoohicky anyway. --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "rogerpellegrini" <rogerpellegrini@...> wrote:
> > I feel compelled to mention an important flaw with this poll. The potential market for MOTM product can be thought of in a lot of different ways. One way to look at it is to divide it into two groups: > > (A) MOTM die-hards: Comprised mostly of those who built modules from kits, this group would like to see a broad variety of modules to complete their MOTM system. Modules that would allow them to perform functions that other modulars also perform (eg sequencers, envelope followers, preamps, etc). This group is also likely to vote for putting choruses, delays, etc., into MOTM format for completeness, although these are also available elsewhere. This is a shrinking group, not a growing group, because in the last few years it has been increasingly difficult to purchase enough modules to create a complete system that might attract the new customer. > > (B) Everyone else who is interested in modulars: They'd like to see something that's not available elsewhere, because if it is available elsewhere, they've already got one. They may or may not need the module in MOTM 5U format. They probably don't want to touch a soldering iron. They likely expect timely delivery. > > This poll, like others before it, will draw largely from group (A). Group (B), though a much larger potential market, is not well represented. > > Reliance on polls like this results in business decisions to keep making hopelessly labor intensive kits or variations on utility or redundant modules that will sell in smaller and smaller numbers. > > Here's an example: > Paul S. wrote: > >Modcan has a CV recorder already, 57B. It's $700. > >I think Eric & I could do a better one for $499. > > Are those Modcan 57B's flying off the shelves? What unsatisfied demand would be uncovered by the cost savings? This might satisfy some group A members, but would not be a money making project. > > Likewise, the Noise/S&H module and the 1U BPF filter could only target group A and will not sell well. > > Sorry to be so negative, > Roger >
2010-04-28 by JH.
>I personally think it would be nice to have one module that fades between two sources by means of one (or two) control voltages >across one or >more outputs without the need for multiple separate VCA's and inverter modules. And the 700 does not achieve what I >am seeking, it is a >discreet switch, not a cross fader. I don't think this request is that far fetched considering Paul had >mentioned in the past that he was going to >build one. I imagine it must have been requested by a few people for him to even >consider it. Well, that probably was my Interpolating Scanner. After many years of waiting, I have decided to offer PCBs for this, myself: http://www.jhaible.de/interpolating_scanner_and_scanvib/jh_interpolating_scanner_and_scanvib.html It does a linear crossfade over 9 inputs. I still have boards for sale. The downside, of course: It's just blank PCBs, and it's not a very easy project to build, either. JH.
2010-04-28 by wjhall11
Oh - yes - of course... that too. (We, of type A, 're set to build this - waiting for a panel.) So again, we pray for stuff from the Paul that we can't or daren't build. --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "JH." <jhaible@...> wrote:
> > >I personally think it would be nice to have one module that fades between two sources by means of one (or two) control voltages > >across one or >more outputs without the need for multiple separate VCA's and inverter modules. And the 700 does not achieve what I > >am seeking, it is a >discreet switch, not a cross fader. I don't think this request is that far fetched considering Paul had > >mentioned in the past that he was going to >build one. I imagine it must have been requested by a few people for him to even > >consider it. > > Well, that probably was my Interpolating Scanner. > After many years of waiting, I have decided to offer PCBs for this, myself: > http://www.jhaible.de/interpolating_scanner_and_scanvib/jh_interpolating_scanner_and_scanvib.html > It does a linear crossfade over 9 inputs. > > I still have boards for sale. The downside, of course: It's just blank PCBs, and it's not a very easy project to build, either. > > JH. >
2010-04-28 by rogerpellegrini
I think it would be useful in this discussion to define the size of potential markets and the attributes of a successful module offering. Market Size Paul posted pertinent ESTIMATES of sales in another forum, which I reproduce here: MOTM 5U 8,609 Paul's estimates: .com 5,500 Blacet 4,500 Doepfer 17,000 Modcan 3,500 Cynthia approx 600 Modcan plus 1100 Zeroscillators of all flavors Paul has mentioned a "rule of 12", which sounds reasonable: the avg customer has 12 modules. Also, Paul has stated that he has sold at least one MOTM module to approx 712 different people. Paul has indicated that sales to early customers drop off for a variety of reasons, so let's estimate the upper bound of the active MOTM market as 500 customers. Adding up the rest of the world, I get around 2,700 total customers just from the above manufacturers. Paul has separately estimated that total Euro customers alone could be 3,500. I'll estimate that the rest of the world, all formats combined, is very roughly 3,500 active customers: "group B" from my previous e-mail. Even if all active MOTM customers are "die-hard" members of "group A" that I previously described, they number at most 12% of the total market. (Clearly, even the 500 are not really all that die-hard, as the MOTM-730 sold just 39 units). Attributes of successful modules Which brings us to a convenient case study. MOTM-730 vs. Zeroscillator. MOTM-730: Performs functions similarly performed by other "pulse divider" modules in the market. For many people, not clear how it's going to be useful. Released only in MOTM format. Zeroscillator: Unique sound generator. Many uses are obvious (VCO, quadrature LFO, FM ala DX7, etc.) Released in many formats. People have an incentive to buy 2 or more, in order to properly do the FM thing. Despite being hideously expensive, the Zeroscillator sold in huge numbers. So, evidently price is NOT important in this market. Combining all this information, I think Paul (and customers interested in seeing him in this business for a long time) would be best served by building modules that: (1) Have multiple obvious, unique and attractive uses for the broad group (A plus B, but mostly B). Sound generators that also produce interesting CV outputs are good examples. (2) Can be integrated into many different format systems. They'd need to be designed such that they could be repackaged in any panel format, perhaps through "partners" such as Bridechamber, STG and Cynthia. (3) Provide possibility for repeat sales, either because it might be useful to buy more than one, or because of an "expander" module to add functionality. Or because if you hook them all up together they perform some crazy super function (think two digital fixed filter banks that act like a vocoder when you hook them together with a ribbon cable). Was that a cool idea, or what? (4) Are priced to recoup R&D and make a profit. The market is not price sensitive for boutique high-quality items. With the best intentions, Roger
2010-04-28 by Joe Miklojcik
Someone who knows how to do market analysis! Thank you!
>>>>> rogerpellegrini <rogerpellegrini@...> writes:
> Cynthia approx 600 Modcan plus 1100 Zeroscillators of all flavors [...]
> Zeroscillator: Unique sound generator. Many uses are obvious (VCO,
> quadrature LFO, FM ala DX7, etc.) Released in many formats. People
> have an incentive to buy 2 or more, in order to properly do the FM
> thing.
> Despite being hideously expensive, the Zeroscillator sold in huge
> numbers. So, evidently price is NOT important in this market.
One thing may be missing from this: of the 1100 Zeroscillators that
sold, how many were MOTM format? Probably not a significant
percentage. That leaves it at having to do the following to 730's to
sell a bunch:
1) Multi-format (mostly probably not MOTM).
2) Name them "Destroyer of Time" or something equivalently sexy and
ironic.
But if we're comparing 730's and Zeroscillators within the MOTM
format, we'd need to know how many MOTM format Zeroscillators sold,
and I'm betting that's comparable to the 730 sales. If that's true,
then we're back at square one for answering the "what to make"
question, no? The answer to everything else is "find a way to release
in Euro format too."
Price sensitivity is affected by this too: 5U (or other large format)
modulars take up huge amounts of space; you need fewer modules, so you
aren't as inclined to think "Dayum bra, I could get two Hertz Donuts
for that much money." I'd bet price is at issue for Euro owners.
Also, you need a house to house a big 5U modular in, so I'd guess most
MOTM owners are in the 'home owner' demo. Euro owners are *probably*
generally younger and *probably* have less disposable income. Hard to
say without more numbers!
Respectfully,
jfm32010-04-28 by eric f
According to Cynthia, at least in the initial run of ZOs, your assumptions are unfounded and the MOTM format sold quite briskly, on par with the Modcan A format and vastly outnumbering euro, frac, and .com. It surpassed 100 units in the first few months, but after that, there really are no solid numbers out there so I haven't a clue what the final totals are. The total number of ZOs sold seems overstated, but Cynthia rarely posts in that (dead dead dead) newsgroup except to occasionally explain why the ZOe still doesn't exist. cheers, eric w f --- On Wed, 4/28/10, Joe Miklojcik <jfm3@...> wrote:
From: Joe Miklojcik <jfm3@...>
Subject: Re: [motm] Re: Wish list and normalling - was OK...so what WILL you buy assembled?
To: "rogerpellegrini" <rogerpellegrini@...>, motm@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, April 28, 2010, 11:09 AM
Someone who knows how to do market analysis! Thank you!
>>>>> rogerpellegrini <rogerpellegrini@ optonline. net> writes:
> Cynthia approx 600 Modcan plus 1100 Zeroscillators of all flavors [...]
> Zeroscillator: Unique sound generator. Many uses are obvious (VCO,
> quadrature LFO, FM ala DX7, etc.) Released in many formats. People
> have an incentive to buy 2 or more, in order to properly do the FM
> thing.
> Despite being hideously expensive, the Zeroscillator sold in huge
> numbers. So, evidently price is NOT important in this market.
One thing may be missing from this: of the 1100 Zeroscillators that
sold, how many were MOTM format? Probably not a significant
percentage. That leaves it at having to do the following to 730's to
sell a bunch:
1) Multi-format (mostly probably not MOTM).
2) Name them "Destroyer of Time" or something equivalently sexy and
ironic.
But if we're comparing 730's and Zeroscillators within the MOTM
format, we'd need to know how many MOTM format Zeroscillators sold,
and I'm betting that's comparable to the 730 sales. If that's true,
then we're back at square one for answering the "what to make"
question, no? The answer to everything else is "find a way to release
in Euro format too."
Price sensitivity is affected by this too: 5U (or other large format)
modulars take up huge amounts of space; you need fewer modules, so you
aren't as inclined to think "Dayum bra, I could get two Hertz Donuts
for that much money." I'd bet price is at issue for Euro owners.
Also, you need a house to house a big 5U modular in, so I'd guess most
MOTM owners are in the 'home owner' demo. Euro owners are *probably*
generally younger and *probably* have less disposable income. Hard to
say without more numbers!
Respectfully,
jfm32010-04-28 by Gordon Van Huizen
I'm surprised that the number of ZOs in MOTM format would "vastly outnumber" those in Euro or DotCom. I've seen a number in the latter two formats in people's rigs and for sale, but I don't recall seeing a single one in MOTM format. And it's not like "Group A" MOTM guys don't show off their rigs!
On Apr 28, 2010, at 1:06 PM, eric f wrote: > According to Cynthia, at least in the initial run of ZOs, your assumptions are unfounded and the MOTM format sold quite briskly, on par with the Modcan A format and vastly outnumbering euro, frac, and .com. It surpassed 100 units in the first few months, but after that, there really are no solid numbers out there so I haven't a clue what the final totals are. The total number of ZOs sold seems overstated, but Cynthia rarely posts in that (dead dead dead) newsgroup except to occasionally explain why the ZOe still doesn't exist. > > cheers, > eric w f > >
2010-04-28 by groovyshaman
From: Paul Schreiber
Subject: Re: [motm] Re: Wish list and normalling - was OK...so what WILL you buy assembled?
To: motm@yahoogroups.com, "rogerpellegrini"
Date: Tuesday, April 27, 2010, 5:53 PM>
> Likewise, the Noise/S&H module and the 1U BPF filter could only target
> group A and will not sell well.
>
> Sorry to be so negative,
> Roger
OK! I agree 100% about the 2 groups. This sort of dawned on me a few days
ago whilst walking the doggie.
I have people with 50+ modules that need X but newbies just starting out
looking for Y or even Z.
So, knowing all of this, the next 2 modules (not the CG, '102 or MT) I
should make are ......????????
Paul S.
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/motm/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/motm/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
motm-digest@yahoogroups.com
motm-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
motm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
2010-04-28 by Stephen Drake
So, here is you chance to tell me what *exactly* you would buy, fully
assembled in SMT glory.
I'm all ears. Analog, digital, optical, whatever.
Paul S.
2010-04-29 by nnovele
I must say that JH Interpolating Scanner is the best module ever. I use it in every patch and it bumps my creative thinking in a good way. Even the boring MOTM-730 Counter turns into a complex event generator :) --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "JH." <jhaible@...> wrote:
> > Well, that probably was my Interpolating Scanner. > After many years of waiting, I have decided to offer PCBs for this, myself: > http://www.jhaible.de/interpolating_scanner_and_scanvib/jh_interpolating_scanner_and_scanvib.html > It does a linear crossfade over 9 inputs. > > I still have boards for sale. The downside, of course: It's just blank PCBs, and it's not a very easy project to build, either. > > JH. >
2010-04-30 by JH.
>I must say that JH Interpolating Scanner is the best module ever. I use it in every patch and it bumps my creative thinking in a >good way. Thank you! - It's an open secret that it's my own favorite of all I've designed, too. :) JH.
2010-05-02 by Jeff Laity
Cross posted from Muff's forum: > I looked to see how many[b] new customers[/b] I shipped MOTM module(s) to in the last 12 months. > > *9* > > Paul, I'm one of your biggest fans. But MOTM has a reputation for endless lead times and vaporware. When you start showing signs of life, the customers will too. I know this is a hobby for you, but ordering 12 modules is real money to most of us. The problem is that you're wasting your time soldering together oscillators and filters instead of engineering new products. I think everyone would be much happier if you found someone to do your module manufacturing for you, even if they aren't up to your NASA-quality soldering skills. I don't think my Minimoog could be launched into space, but through-hole soldering doesn't require that much precision. Hell, if my dumb monkey-ass soldering can put together your modules, anyone can. Get someone to build your modules and spend your time on R&D to release new models. You've shipped more modules than Bob ever did with one to two employees. What's wrong with this picture? :)
2010-05-02 by John L Rice
My vote for the next up modules are the MOTM-600 uSeq and the 1U BP filter! That said, I know it would be a fair amount of time and money, but . . . I think you should make working prototypes of ALL of the below modules, and then loan them to two or three people to make some functionally demonstrative AND musically exciting audio and video demos (all modesty aside, I'd be happy to do some! ;-) and then share those with everyone. I think people could get more excited and be able to tell which ones they want the most. John L Rice ------------------------------------------ Morphing Terrarium MOTM-102 Noise/ASR MOTM-520 Cloud Generator w/521 MOTM-530 Envelope Nest (bizarre EG) MOTM-540 Munging Decimator (VC bit-rate reduction) MOTM-550 Rhythm Wheel (Seq/ASR/S&H w/pattern gen) MOTM-125 Pulse Width Multiplier Dual 10000ms Delay (discussed 8/19/00) DoMOAS (Daughter of Mother of all Sequencers) VC Phase Shifter Synthtech Vocoder MOTM-130 Dual Pan/Fade VCA (so close!) MOTM-180 Triple Preamp MOTM-450 Fixed Filter Bank (ugh) MOTM-460 ARP 2600-4072 VCF MOTM-470 SEM VCF w/morphing output MOTM-600 uSequencer (double ugh) MOTM-810 JH's VC EG MOTM-840 Envelope Follower/Compressor MOTM-880 VC Filter Envelope Generator (CS-80) Matrix-12 15-Mode VCF Bi-Phase Clone Joystick Interface Random Vibrato Source (discussed 11/23/00)
2010-05-03 by IvanCU2
Actually, build quality is part of what I feel I'm paying for with MOTM. Ivan --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, Jeff Laity <synthetic@...> wrote: > > I think everyone would be much happier if you found someone to do your module manufacturing for you, even if they aren't up to your NASA-quality soldering skills.
2010-05-03 by Aaron Day
Actually, build quality is part of what I feel I'm paying for with MOTM.
Ivan
--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, Jeff Laity wrote:
>
> I think everyone would be much happier if you found someone to do your module manufacturing for you, even if they aren't up to your NASA-quality soldering skills.