Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Thread

Logo try #2

Logo try #2

2008-12-10 by Paul Schreiber

I've updated the viewing directory:
http://www.gunnarlockwood.com/psmotm/logo/2
If it doesn't look different, you might need to reload.

I listened to everyone's comments and we found some more fonts that
may be better than previous ones. These also are easier to read in smaller
heights.

Reply back to me with #1-#4 and I'll move on to other stuff :)

BTW: the MOTM-380 panels are now on order. I am a bit
low on MOTM-960s but 75 more are coming.

I also have 1 BI pot quote in that is a bit high, waiting for 1 more to show 
up.

Paul S.

Re: [motm] Logo try #2

2008-12-10 by John Mahoney

#1  (But I still think Meta is a better font! ;-)

I used to set type, and IMHO the set of fonts offered has been -- to 
use the vernacular -- pretty sucky. Again, that's just my opinion.

Thanks for asking what the peanut gallery thinks, Paul. You'll 
probably never do *that* again, LOL!

John

Re: Logo try #2

2008-12-10 by wjhall11

Well - this is interesting - I like #3 top and bottom layouts.  I
didn't think I would, but I do.  Yup #3.  <g>



--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...> wrote:
>
> I've updated the viewing directory:
> http://www.gunnarlockwood.com/psmotm/logo/2
> If it doesn't look different, you might need to reload.
> 
> I listened to everyone's comments and we found some more fonts that
> may be better than previous ones. These also are easier to read in
smaller
> heights.
> 
> Reply back to me with #1-#4 and I'll move on to other stuff :)
> 
> BTW: the MOTM-380 panels are now on order. I am a bit
> low on MOTM-960s but 75 more are coming.
> 
> I also have 1 BI pot quote in that is a bit high, waiting for 1 more
to show 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> up.
> 
> Paul S.
>

RE: [motm] Logo try #2

2008-12-10 by John L Rice

I'll vote #4

John L Rice
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul
Schreiber
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 7:21 PM
To: MOTM List
Subject: [motm] Logo try #2

I've updated the viewing directory:
http://www.gunnarlockwood.com/psmotm/logo/2
If it doesn't look different, you might need to reload.

I listened to everyone's comments and we found some more fonts that
may be better than previous ones. These also are easier to read in smaller
heights.

Reply back to me with #1-#4 and I'll move on to other stuff :)

BTW: the MOTM-380 panels are now on order. I am a bit
low on MOTM-960s but 75 more are coming.

I also have 1 BI pot quote in that is a bit high, waiting for 1 more to show

up.

Paul S.


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

Re: [motm] Logo try #2

2008-12-10 by Jeff Laity

#1.  #4 is my second choice.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Dec 9, 2008, at 8:15 PM, John L Rice wrote:

>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf  
> Of Paul
> Schreiber
> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 7:21 PM
> To: MOTM List
> Subject: [motm] Logo try #2
>
> I've updated the viewing directory:
> http://www.gunnarlockwood.com/psmotm/logo/2
> If it doesn't look different, you might need to reload.
>
> I listened to everyone's comments and we found some more fonts that
> may be better than previous ones. These also are easier to read in  
> smaller
> heights.
>
> Reply back to me with #1-#4 and I'll move on to other stuff :)
>
> BTW: the MOTM-380 panels are now on order. I am a bit
> low on MOTM-960s but 75 more are coming.
>
> I also have 1 BI pot quote in that is a bit high, waiting for 1 more  
> to show
>
> up.
>
> Paul S.
>

RE: [motm] Logo try #2

2008-12-10 by Adam Schabtach

> I also have 1 BI pot quote in that is a bit high, waiting for 1 more to
show up.

I don't know whether or not you have any interest in being in the parts
reseller business, but there don't seem to be many (any?) U.S. suppliers for
small quantities of these pots and I could use, say, a dozen each of 100K
linear and 50K audio.

--Adam

Re: Logo try #2

2008-12-10 by djxpat

Actually, I like #2 best, then #1. I'm not so into the all lower case 
lettering for Synthesis Technologies. This is the graphic desinger in 
me speaking. I'm glad your designer included a smaller verion of each 
because it shows you where the text breaks up or chunks up. At the TV 
station, we always walked across the room to judge our work, to see 
if you could still recognize what you were aiming for on a small 
screen from far away. Could you still read it, did it stand out or 
blend in appropriately, etc. Even though font #2 is like a gimmicky 
font you'd download from 1001 free fonts, it works well for logos. 
It's a little retro, a little modern, and a touch foreign. Kind of 
2001-ish, 60's futurism while grounded enough to not look like it's 
an old bi-phase pulled from someone's attic. I think it gives it the 
best sense of a real brand. #1 is condensed, and I've always loved 
condensed fonts, though they can chunk up really easily when small, 
they are much easier to place within the context of other graphics or 
text. #1 is the most generic of the fonts. #3 has a military surplus 
technology kind of thing going on, like you sold oscilliscopes in the 
40s or 50s. it's not bad, but the font is a tad generic for my taste. 
my opinion of #4 is personal. i just don't like the font. couple that 
with not liking all lower case, it's my least favorite.

trying to look with a critical eye, paul. i'm hope most of you are 
getting a good laugh out of my graphic designer geeky comments. 
honestly, any of the logos would be fine. but since you asked, i gave 
my opinions and preferences.

erik


--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...> wrote:
>
> I've updated the viewing directory:
> http://www.gunnarlockwood.com/psmotm/logo/2
> If it doesn't look different, you might need to reload.
> 
> I listened to everyone's comments and we found some more fonts that
> may be better than previous ones. These also are easier to read in 
smaller
> heights.
> 
> Reply back to me with #1-#4 and I'll move on to other stuff :)
> 
> BTW: the MOTM-380 panels are now on order. I am a bit
> low on MOTM-960s but 75 more are coming.
> 
> I also have 1 BI pot quote in that is a bit high, waiting for 1 
more to show 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> up.
> 
> Paul S.
>

Re: [motm] Re: Logo try #2

2008-12-10 by Ti_

I like #3 the best too.  #2 is OK, but #3's the winner in my eyes.
~Tim C.




________________________________
From: wjhall11 <wjhall@...>
To: motm@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2008 10:09:47 PM
Subject: [motm] Re: Logo try #2


Well - this is interesting - I like #3 top and bottom layouts.  I
didn't think I would, but I do.  Yup #3.  <g>

--- In motm@yahoogroups. com, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...> wrote:
>
> I've updated the viewing directory:
> http://www.gunnarlo ckwood.com/ psmotm/logo/ 2
> If it doesn't look different, you might need to reload.
> 
> I listened to everyone's comments and we found some more fonts that
> may be better than previous ones. These also are easier to read in
smaller
> heights.
> 
> Reply back to me with #1-#4 and I'll move on to other stuff :)
> 
> BTW: the MOTM-380 panels are now on order. I am a bit
> low on MOTM-960s but 75 more are coming.
> 
> I also have 1 BI pot quote in that is a bit high, waiting for 1 more
to show 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> up.
> 
> Paul S.
>

Re: [motm] Re: Logo try #2

2008-12-10 by Jeff Laity

A far more serious question: what type of paint will be used to print  
the new logo?!?

> --- In motm@yahoogroups. com, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...> wrote:
> >
> > I've updated the viewing directory:
> > http://www.gunnarlo ckwood.com/ psmotm/logo/ 2
> > If it doesn't look different, you might need to reload.
> >
> > I listened to everyone's comments and we found some more fonts that
> > may be better than previous ones. These also are easier to read in
> smaller
> > heights.
> >
> > Reply back to me with #1-#4 and I'll move on to other stuff :)
> >
> > BTW: the MOTM-380 panels are now on order. I am a bit
> > low on MOTM-960s but 75 more are coming.
> >
> > I also have 1 BI pot quote in that is a bit high, waiting for 1 more
> to show
> > up.
> >
> > Paul S.
> >
>


NOTICE: This electronic mail message and its contents, including any attachments hereto (collectively, "this e-mail"), is hereby designated as "confidential and proprietary." This e-mail\ufffdmay be viewed and used only by the person to whom it has been sent and his/her employer\ufffdsolely for the express purpose for which it has been disclosed and only in\ufffdaccordance with any confidentiality or non-disclosure (or similar) agreement between TEAC Corporation or its affiliates and said employer, and may not be disclosed to any other person or entity. \ufffd
\ufffd

 


\ufffd

Re: [motm] Logo try #2

2008-12-11 by Richard Brewster

If you look at the #2 smaller font, it is the most legible.  This one 
scales down better.  I also liked it the first time.

Richard Brewster

Paul Schreiber wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> I've updated the viewing directory:
> http://www.gunnarlockwood.com/psmotm/logo/2
> If it doesn't look different, you might need to reload.
>
> I listened to everyone's comments and we found some more fonts that
> may be better than previous ones. These also are easier to read in smaller
> heights.
>
> Reply back to me with #1-#4 and I'll move on to other stuff :)
>
> BTW: the MOTM-380 panels are now on order. I am a bit
> low on MOTM-960s but 75 more are coming.
>
> I also have 1 BI pot quote in that is a bit high, waiting for 1 more to show 
> up.
>
> Paul S.
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [motm] Logo try #2

2008-12-11 by George Kisslak

I don't think my first vote made it to the list, but anyway, I like #1
first layout on this next go around.  I cracked in my first vote that I
guess this means that my MOTM hat will now be an instant collectors item.

George


Paul Schreiber wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> I've updated the viewing directory:
> http://www.gunnarlockwood.com/psmotm/logo/2
> If it doesn't look different, you might need to reload.
> 
> I listened to everyone's comments and we found some more fonts that
> may be better than previous ones. These also are easier to read in smaller
> heights.
> 
> Reply back to me with #1-#4 and I'll move on to other stuff :)
> 
> BTW: the MOTM-380 panels are now on order. I am a bit
> low on MOTM-960s but 75 more are coming.
> 
> I also have 1 BI pot quote in that is a bit high, waiting for 1 more to show 
> up.
> 
> Paul S.

Re: [motm] Logo try #2

2008-12-11 by Jason Proctor

i think i'd rather Paul work on designs than fuss about with logos ;-)

Re: [motm] Logo try #2

2008-12-11 by James Elliott

3

From: Paul Schreiber
To: MOTM List
Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2008 9:21:16 PM
Subject: [motm] Logo try #2

I've updated the viewing directory:
http://www.gunnarlo ckwood.com/ psmotm/logo/ 2
If it doesn't look different, you might need to reload.

I listened to everyone's comments and we found some more fonts that
may be better than previous ones. These also are easier to read in smaller
heights.

Reply back to me with #1-#4 and I'll move on to other stuff :)

BTW: the MOTM-380 panels are now on order. I am a bit
low on MOTM-960s but 75 more are coming.

I also have 1 BI pot quote in that is a bit high, waiting for 1 more to show
up.

Paul S.


Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.