MOTM

I am exploring alternate designs to the VC ADSR. The features will be close, 
if not exactly, the same. JH tends to use all discrete, lots of parts 
approach :) I'm looking at something that has 90% fewer parts at roughtly 
the same price. Also, the new approach (if it pans out) will have additional 
bells and whistles.

For the existing MOTM-800, that will be a stripped-down MOTM-1800 design 
(all discrete, without the loop/burst stuff).

Paul S.

You mean the same features? Otherwise, what's the point?

On Sep 2, 2008, at 9:40 AM, Paul Schreiber wrote:

>  I'm looking at something that has 90% fewer parts at roughtly
> the same price.


NOTICE: This electronic mail message and its contents, including any attachments hereto (collectively, "this e-mail"), is hereby designated as "confidential and proprietary." This e-mail\ufffdmay be viewed and used only by the person to whom it has been sent and his/her employer\ufffdsolely for the express purpose for which it has been disclosed and only in\ufffdaccordance with any confidentiality or non-disclosure (or similar) agreement between TEAC Corporation or its affiliates and said employer, and may not be disclosed to any other person or entity. \ufffd
\ufffd

 


\ufffd