Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-03-31 01:40 UTC

Thread

If I'd consider making a PCB for a flanger ...

If I'd consider making a PCB for a flanger ...

2007-07-15 by JH.

... what BBD would you prefer?

I get quite a lot of requests for making pcbs for the Storm Tide flanger.

I can't do exactly that , for 3 reasons:

(1) It uses highly obsolete BBDs
(2) It's too close to Eventide
(3) I know a lot of things I'd do differently now.

But I'm (vaguely!) thinking about a "Son of Storm Tide" as a future pcb
project.

If I'd do this, I'd obviously not use SAD1024s.

I have a favorite vintage BBD chip of which considerable stock is left, so
I'd design it for this chip.
I'd want to have a fallback strategy in case this chip suddenly gets
extinct, and so my plan would be to offer a pcb where you have a choice of
two different BBD chips to solder in. (Similar as I did with the different
transitor arrays on the tau phaser.)

Now, I know what BBD chip option #1 would be (I won't tell right now, for
obvious reasons ...)

Please let me know what you'd prefer as option #2. (Should *not* be another
vintage / extinct specimen, but one of the modern parts.)

Preferred length is 512 stages.

JH.
_________________
CDs of my music available here:
http://www.lulu.com/jhaible

Re: [motm] If I'd consider making a PCB for a flanger ...

2007-07-15 by Mark

On 7/7/07, JH. put forth:
>If there's enough interest, this could be a project for a future PCB
>development. I wouldn't restrict this to Hammond emulation, but make a
>mono-in / stereo out device in the fashion of many Roland / Boss dual-BBD
>chorus circuits. Just without BBD. Let me know what you think ...

I don't think I'd be interested in the scanner chorus. While I'm
sure that getting it to work was quite an achievement, and it's short
delay time is uniquely impressive, imho, it's a bit too subtle for my
tastes. However, I would be be quite interested in a Roland
emulation dual-BBD PCB.

On 7/15/07, JH. put forth:
>Now, I know what BBD chip option #1 would be (I won't tell right now, for
>obvious reasons ...)
>
>Please let me know what you'd prefer as option #2. (Should *not* be another
>vintage / extinct specimen, but one of the modern parts.)
>
>Preferred length is 512 stages.

Curious, which BBD chips are currently in production?? As far as
single units with 512 stages, there was the Reticon SAD512 (which
came in 8 and 16-pin versions), the Phillips TDA 1022 (16-pin), and
the Panasonic MN3002, MN3204, and MN3304 (all 8-pin, afaik). I don't
think there are any others. I have heard conflicting opinions on
whether or not the MN series can be used as direct replacements for
the Reticon chips.

Re: If I'd consider making a PCB for a flanger ...

2007-07-16 by ivancu@aol.com

>Please let me know what you'd prefer as option #2. (Should *not* be another vintage / extinct >specimen, but one of the modern parts.)
What BBD's are still available?  Panasonic?

I seem to recall some "new" Chinese SAD1024's on eBay a while ago.

I've got two Klark-Teknik DN34's with sixteen SAD512's in EACH unit. One of these days I need to get at least one of them fully functional (haven't tried them in years).

Ivan


AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com.