MOTM Format Zeroscillator Update!
2007-06-21 by Cynthia
Yahoo Groups archive
Index last updated: 2026-03-31 23:28 UTC
Thread
2007-06-21 by Cynthia
2007-06-22 by Eric Wood
----- Original Message -----From: CynthiaSent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 3:12 PMSubject: [motm] MOTM Format Zeroscillator Update!At long last MOTM format ZOs are
shipping again! We made a small
batch of MOTM Zeroscillators this
time, and after shipping half a
dozen of them over the next few
days we will have only four units
in stock and ready to ship.
Now is a good time to grab one
as we'll be concentrating on the
other format ZOs until the next
Christmas season.
Best Wishes!
Cynthia
http://www.cyndustr ies.com/No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.9.1/857 - Release Date: 6/20/2007 2:18 PM
2007-06-26 by elle_webb
>FYI - I ordered an "in-stock" Zeroscillator and had to wait a year to
> At long last MOTM format ZOs are
> shipping again! We made a small
> batch of MOTM Zeroscillators this
> time, and after shipping half a
> dozen of them over the next few
> days we will have only four units
> in stock and ready to ship.
>
> Now is a good time to grab one
> as we'll be concentrating on the
> other format ZOs until the next
> Christmas season.
>
2007-06-27 by James Elliott
--- In motm@yahoogroups. com, "Cynthia" <cynthia.webster@ ...> wrote:
>
> At long last MOTM format ZOs are
> shipping again! We made a small
> batch of MOTM Zeroscillators this
> time, and after shipping half a
> dozen of them over the next few
> days we will have only four units
> in stock and ready to ship.
>
> Now is a good time to grab one
> as we'll be concentrating on the
> other format ZOs until the next
> Christmas season.
>
FYI - I ordered an "in-stock" Zeroscillator and had to wait a year to
get it, while Cyndustries sat on my $$$ and continued to advertise
them as "in-stock".
The Zeroscillator IS a nice module, but the purchase experience was
the worst I have with any modular synth supplier, including MOTM,
Blacet, Catgirl, Synthesizers. com and Oakley.
I'd recommend working through a third party like Analogue Haven, if
possible, so Cyndustries can focus on production and developing
interesting modules instead of handling orders.
2007-06-27 by michael stein
I ordered "in-stock" MOTM kits 10 months ago, paid cash for them, and I am still waiting on them....Kind of sux when $1000+ is tied up in un-delivered modules, huh.I won't be ordering a Zeroscillator, because there is no way in hell I am going to repeat this experience.----- Original Message ----
From: elle_webb <elle_webb@...>
To: motm@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 2:35:23 PM
Subject: [motm] Re: MOTM Format Zeroscillator Update!
--- In motm@yahoogroups. com, "Cynthia" <cynthia.webster@ ...> wrote:
>
> At long last MOTM format ZOs are
> shipping again! We made a small
> batch of MOTM Zeroscillators this
> time, and after shipping half a
> dozen of them over the next few
> days we will have only four units
> in stock and ready to ship.
>
> Now is a good time to grab one
> as we'll be concentrating on the
> other format ZOs until the next
> Christmas season.
>
FYI - I ordered an "in-stock" Zeroscillator and had to wait a year to
get it, while Cyndustries sat on my $$$ and continued to advertise
them as "in-stock".
The Zeroscillator IS a nice module, but the purchase experience was
the worst I have with any modular synth supplier, including MOTM,
Blacet, Catgirl, Synthesizers. com and Oakley.
I'd recommend working through a third party like Analogue Haven, if
possible, so Cyndustries can focus on production and developing
interesting modules instead of handling orders.
Need a vacation? Get great deals to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel.Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles.
Visit the Yahoo! Auto Green Center.
2007-06-27 by Jeff Laity
I ordered "in-stock" MOTM kits 10 months ago, paid cash for them, and I am still waiting on them....
NOTICE: This electronic mail message and its contents, including any attachments hereto (collectively, "this e-mail"), is hereby designated as "confidential and proprietary." This e-mail may be viewed and used only by the person to whom it has been sent and his/her employer solely for the express purpose for which it has been disclosed and only in accordance with any confidentiality or non-disclosure (or similar) agreement between TEAC Corporation or its affiliates and said employer, and may not be disclosed to any other person or entity.
2007-06-27 by John Mahoney
>In-stock must mean all the parts are at hand but someones gottaDotcom amps (VCAs) are known to be susceptible to power
>bag'em up and ship it. It is understood and expected that ordering
>from MOTM could result in a long lead time. I've got no complaints,
>things are supposed to pick up in that department with MOTM and it
>sounds to me that paul has been workin his arse off lately, so i'm
>sure your wait is almost over.
>My .COM filters and amps have been putting out a good load of
>noise/hums lately and Paul your filters don't seem to do this. Any
>tips on what might be the problem. (or difference?) p.s. and no
>there not self oscillating.
>Thanx,
>-michael-
2007-06-28 by James Elliott
On Jun 27, 2007, at 10:26 AM, James Elliott wrote:
I ordered "in-stock" MOTM kits 10 months ago, paid cash for them, and I am still waiting on them....
NOTICE: This electronic mail message and its contents, including any attachments hereto (collectively, "this e-mail"), is hereby designated as "confidential and proprietary. " This e-mail may be viewed and used only by the person to whom it has been sent and his/her employer solely for the express purpose for which it has been disclosed and only in accordance with any confidentiality or non-disclosure (or similar) agreement between TEAC Corporation or its affiliates and said employer, and may not be disclosed to any other person or entity.
2007-06-28 by Mark
>It sounds like a power supply problem. One great thing about the
>My .COM filters and amps have been putting out a good load of
>noise/hums lately and Paul your filters don't seem to do this. Any
>tips on what might be the problem. (or difference?) p.s. and no
>there not self oscillating.
>Thanx,