320s are ALIVE
1999-12-12 by J. Larry Hendry
Well, I just finished building two MOTM-320s. I spent about 9 hours total across 4 different days. So, for me 4 1/2 hours was the per-module time. It is almost as difficult as the 300, but had fewer front panel stuff, so that made the last part go a little quicker. I must say that this is the absolutely coolest LFO I have ever seen. So, my high expectations of MOTM are not denied. Both of mine worked perfectly on first power up. This time I made certain not to stick any ICs in backwards like I did on my 410. It's amazing how easy one can make such silly, stupid mistakes. The dual-colored LED is VERY, VERY, VERY cool. I think there should be some other MOTM modules in the future with this feature. No, I don't want one on every module, but where they can be a meaningful and valuable addition, I hope Paul will consider using them again. when using the shape controls at higher rates, the LED really reminds you if you have your wave biased to the high or low side of zero by virtually staying the color of majority. This is SUPER in my opinion. If I had a choice to leave this out for a $ 6 savings, I would say, "NO WAY." My conclusion was that selection of the sine wave for LED indication was the most desirable. I will be interested to see what others think. I applaud Paul for including the tri-wave in the selection since this is the only one where shape will NOT effect the LED operation. I can see where some might prefer that. If I could change anything on the modules I can think of only one thing. I would make the "SHAPE" silk screen scale +/- 5 with 0 at the mid point just like the FM control since the mid point is where shape is not modified with no CV inserted. The 0 - 10 scale tends to make me think it is attenuation when the CV is applied, and it is not, it is "initial." The only difficulty I had during the construction was the tempco. After I pulled the tempco down to the board, I bent the two transistors over to make contact. Since there is a bit of spring in the transistor leads, the contact is not quite as solid as I would like to see. My conclusion is that a better contact could be made if the transistors were bent over just prior to soldering the tempco while it will still "give" over to one side some. Then when the tempco is pulled to its center line by soldering it down tight, the transistors contact will be more solid. Congratulations Paul on another GREAT module. I'm glad I ordered two. Larry (stooge) Hendry - surprised I am the first to report on MOTM-320 since I have been dubbed "slow" in the past with my construction.