Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-05 20:20 UTC

Thread

Poor MOTM-700

Poor MOTM-700

2006-07-03 by Paul Schreiber

> Personally, I'm chagrined by the discontinuation of the 700. It gets my
> nomination for Most Underappreciated MOTM Module. I use mine all the time,
> and will purchase a second one during the BIG SALE.
>

I personally agree. It's a really cool module that makes NO audio :) But it can 
me patched up to do all sorts of things. I've only sold 9 of them in the last 9 
months.

Paul S.

Re: [motm] Poor MOTM-700

2006-07-03 by Aaron Day

I second this. When in use w/ my analog sequencers its a swiss army knife.

People, buy one of these while you have the chance.



On 03.07.2006, at 20:34 Uhr, Paul Schreiber wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text

> Personally, I'm chagrined by the discontinuation of the 700. It gets my
>; nomination for Most Underappreciated MOTM Module. I use mine all the time,
> and will purchase a second one during the BIG SALE.
>

I personally agree. It's a really cool module that makes NO audio :) But it can
me patched up to do all sorts of things. I've only sold 9 of them in the last 9
months.

Paul S.

New Message Search

Find the message you want faster. Visit your group to try out the improved message search.

SPONSORED LINKS
.

Re: [motm] Poor MOTM-700

2006-07-03 by Scott Juskiw

>  > Personally, I'm chagrined by the discontinuation of the 700. It gets my
>>  nomination for Most Underappreciated MOTM Module. I use mine all the time,
>>  and will purchase a second one during the BIG SALE.
>>
>
>I personally agree. It's a really cool module that makes NO audio :) 
>But it can
>me patched up to do all sorts of things. I've only sold 9 of them in 
>the last 9
>months.
>

That's really sad. I have two 700s and use them all the time. I can't 
imagine a synth without them. I should really get going on writing my 
own patch book so other people can see how useful the 700 is.

Re: [motm] Poor MOTM-700 - Patch book

2006-07-03 by Richard Brewster

Yes, Scott.  Whatever patches you could document would be great 
information for everyone.  I use my MOTM-700 frequently, but I could use 
it more and better with some interesting patch ideas from other folks.  
Of course I can come up with these too, and I should.

Richard Brewster
http://www.pugix.com

Scott Juskiw wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>>  > Personally, I'm chagrined by the discontinuation of the 700. It gets my
>>     
>>>  nomination for Most Underappreciated MOTM Module. I use mine all the time,
>>>  and will purchase a second one during the BIG SALE.
>>>
>>>       
>> I personally agree. It's a really cool module that makes NO audio :) 
>> But it can
>> me patched up to do all sorts of things. I've only sold 9 of them in 
>> the last 9
>> months.
>>
>>     
>
> That's really sad. I have two 700s and use them all the time. I can't 
> imagine a synth without them. I should really get going on writing my 
> own patch book so other people can see how useful the 700 is.
>
>

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.