MOTM

Any chance of a looping ADSR for us original format types?

Yep, the MOTM-810.

Paul S.

Does this mean the 810 will replace the 800 from now on?
I like the looping feature a lot. Is there a mod for the 800's so that I could add this feature 
myself to my 800's ?



--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...> wrote:

>
> Any chance of a looping ADSR for us original format types?
> 
> Yep, the MOTM-810.
> 
> Paul S.
>

is the 810 the vc one too?

hopeso

>Does this mean the 810 will replace the 800 from now on?
>I like the looping feature a lot. Is there a mod for the 800's so 
>that I could add this feature
>myself to my 800's ?

> Does this mean the 810 will replace the 800 from now on?
> I like the looping feature a lot. Is there a mod for the 800's so that I
> could add this feature
> myself to my 800's ?

a) no, does not replace it (meaning, MOTM-800 will still be available)

b) it's a 100% new design, can't modify the old one.

Paul S>

Looking forward to it :-)
How fast will/could  the looping be, I.E. could the loop signal be  
used as a sort of LFO with near limitless shape ?
I'm dreaming up some options here :-)


On 15 May 2006, at 21:53, synth1@... wrote:

>> Does this mean the 810 will replace the 800 from now on?
>> I like the looping feature a lot. Is there a mod for the 800's so  
>> that I
>> could add this feature
>> myself to my 800's ?
>
> a) no, does not replace it (meaning, MOTM-800 will still be available)
>
> b) it's a 100% new design, can't modify the old one.
>
> Paul S>
>
>

Koos Fockens
www.motmsynth.blogspot.com
torikoos@...

Will the looping adsr be 1U or 2U wide?  My guess: 2U.  However, it
seems like 1U is 'workable' (easy for the LED and switch), possibly
removing the OUT- output for the Pushbutton.  It would help those of
us with constrained cabinet real estate.
Just my $.01, Jeff
>

> Will the looping adsr be 1U or 2U wide?  My guess: 2U. 

2U because it *adds* CV control of ADSR.

Paul S.

if the difference was just looping, then 1U would be manageable. 
however it's also VC, so 2U is necessary if only to accommodate the 
extra CV inputs.

>Will the looping adsr be 1U or 2U wide?  My guess: 2U.  However, it
>seems like 1U is 'workable' (easy for the LED and switch), possibly
>removing the OUT- output for the Pushbutton.  It would help those of
>us with constrained cabinet real estate.

paul, do you implement the function for controlling each point of the 
envelope by cv ?

best

rick

Paul Schreiber schrieb:

>> Will the looping adsr be 1U or 2U wide?  My guess: 2U. 
>>     
>
> 2U because it *adds* CV control of ADSR.
>
> Paul S.
>
>
>
>
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>  
>
>
>

> paul, do you implement the function for controlling each point of the
> envelope by cv ?

Well, the Attack, Decay and Release times are set by a CV, as is Sustain level. 
Not sure by
the term "point".

Paul S.

If not already under consideration, I strongly suggest putting in an End
Gate output socket (ie., gate goes high when Release (or Decay? maybe a
switch to select which one?) goes below some positive voltage.  I have
found this to be very useful and intergrable with other modules. If
front panel space is used up already, maybe a toggle switch to switch
between OUT- and END GATE at one socket.

If there is room, a pot (say, 0 to + 4V) to select the voltage below
which the gate goes high on the Release (or Decay?) slope would be very
nice.  [Ok, then we get into voltage control of when the gate goes
high.]

Just my $.02 to bother Paul again, Jeff