Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Thread

Fw: [motm] Re: cabinets.

Fw: [motm] Re: cabinets.

2006-04-15 by Gert Jalass

----- Original Message ----- 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "Gert Jalass" <synth@...>
To: "edibennardo" <endiendi@...>
Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2006 4:47 PM
Subject: Re: [motm] Re: cabinets.


> Hi Enrico,
>
> the S.Com cabinets don't have rails - the modules are directly attached 
> using "wood" screws.
>
> I do believe that having rails is the way to go in case you do want to 
> swap your modules on a regular basis (therefore I am using re-manufactured 
> Moog look alikes ).
>
> And Stooge rails do fit, too.
>
> Gert
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "edibennardo" <endiendi@...>
> To: <motm@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2006 2:58 PM
> Subject: [motm] Re: cabinets.
>
>
>> --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "mate_stubb" <mate_stubb@...> wrote:
>>>
>>> Why not just buy the dotcom cabinets?
>>>
>>> Moe
>> I'm sure this has been discussed already and I probably missed
>> something, anyway, since MOTM and .com have roughly the same height
>> but not the same width I'm wondering how .com modules are attached to
>> the cabinet, i mean they have rails? (in this case these wouldn't
>> match MOTM's width) to they have screws receptacles in the wood or,
>> more simply, would it be possible to insert stooge rails in .com
>> cabinets? I'm sure someone went through this matter and knows exactly
>> the answer.
>> Thanks Enrico
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Fw: [motm] Re: cabinets.

2006-04-15 by edibennardo

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Gert Jalass" <synth@...> wrote:
> > Hi Enrico,
> >
> > the S.Com cabinets don't have rails - the modules are directly 
attached 
> > using "wood" screws.
> >
>> > And Stooge rails do fit, too.
> >
> > Gert
I see, but if rails must be added and not replaced, i guess rails 
have their own thickness so the modules would probably protrude a 
bit outward of the case if I'm not mistaking, unless there's a deep 
gap in those cabinets between the edge of the cabinet and the 
internal surface where the modules are attached. I can not tell 
anything from the pics.
What about the number of U spaces? i calculated that a 22 .com is 
equivalent to 26 motm U plus some gap, is this correct? I'm not 
familiar at all with inches in this metric latin world :-)

Enrico (Italy)

Re: Fw: [motm] Re: cabinets.

2006-04-15 by Richard Brewster

There is no problem with thickness.  Yes, it provides 26U plus a little 
gap that is handled with Stooge end caps.  I believe all the rails and 
screws are -- or will be -- available from Stooge Industries.

http://www.stoogeindustries.com/

Richard Brewster

http://www.pugix.com

edibennardo wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>I see, but if rails must be added and not replaced, i guess rails 
>have their own thickness so the modules would probably protrude a 
>bit outward of the case if I'm not mistaking, unless there's a deep 
>gap in those cabinets between the edge of the cabinet and the 
>internal surface where the modules are attached. I can not tell 
>anything from the pics.
>What about the number of U spaces? i calculated that a 22 .com is 
>equivalent to 26 motm U plus some gap, is this correct? I'm not 
>familiar at all with inches in this metric latin world :-)
>
>Enrico (Italy)
>
>
>
>  
>

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.