Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Thread

650 question

650 question

2006-04-04 by David Holt

I was reading the early version of the '650 manual.  I thought (and I 
could be wrong) that it would do duophonic voice allocation ala the 
Odyssey or Octave Cat.  Does it or do I misremember?

-dave

Re: 650 question

2006-04-04 by Mike Marsh

As long as I've been on this group I still make the same mistake: send
to poster instead of to the group. Crap. Either I'm stupid or the user
interface SUCKS.

I posted to David that the 650 has 2/2 mode which is essentially two
duophonic modes if you set them up al Poly and on separate channels.

Mike

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "David Holt" <dave_3283@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> I was reading the early version of the '650 manual.  I thought (and I 
> could be wrong) that it would do duophonic voice allocation ala the 
> Odyssey or Octave Cat.  Does it or do I misremember?
> 
> -dave
>

Re: 650 question

2006-04-04 by mate_stubb

You're not wrong. The interface sucks.

Moe
--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Marsh" <michaelmarsh@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> 
> As long as I've been on this group I still make the same mistake: send
> to poster instead of to the group. Crap. Either I'm stupid or the user
> interface SUCKS.
> 
> I posted to David that the 650 has 2/2 mode which is essentially two
> duophonic modes if you set them up al Poly and on separate channels.
> 
> Mike
> 
> --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "David Holt" <dave_3283@> wrote:
> >
> > I was reading the early version of the '650 manual.  I thought (and I 
> > could be wrong) that it would do duophonic voice allocation ala the 
> > Odyssey or Octave Cat.  Does it or do I misremember?
> > 
> > -dave
> >
>

[motm] Re: 650 question

2006-04-04 by Scott Juskiw

But is that two separate notes all the time, or two outputs that are 
either in unison or separate depending on how many notes you play? 
Didn't the Odyssey play two oscillators off one note, but if you 
played two notes at the same time the  oscillators played different 
notes? Does the 650 do that?
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>I posted to David that the 650 has 2/2 mode which is essentially two
>duophonic modes if you set them up al Poly and on separate channels.
>
>  >
>>  I was reading the early version of the '650 manual.  I thought (and I
>>  could be wrong) that it would do duophonic voice allocation ala the
>  > Odyssey or Octave Cat.  Does it or do I misremember?
>>

Re: 650 question

2006-04-04 by mate_stubb

Scott,

The 650 has Unison mode, which stacks all available channels across
how many notes are played. Sounds like what you are asking for.

Moe

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, Scott Juskiw <scott@...> wrote:
>
> But is that two separate notes all the time, or two outputs that are 
> either in unison or separate depending on how many notes you play? 
> Didn't the Odyssey play two oscillators off one note, but if you 
> played two notes at the same time the  oscillators played different 
> notes? Does the 650 do that?
> 
> >I posted to David that the 650 has 2/2 mode which is essentially two
> >duophonic modes if you set them up al Poly and on separate channels.
> >
> >  >
> >>  I was reading the early version of the '650 manual.  I thought
(and I
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> >>  could be wrong) that it would do duophonic voice allocation ala the
> >  > Odyssey or Octave Cat.  Does it or do I misremember?
> >>
>

Re: [motm] Re: 650 question

2006-04-04 by Neil Bradley

> As long as I've been on this group I still make the same mistake: send
> to poster instead of to the group. Crap. Either I'm stupid or the user
> interface SUCKS.

On the 650 or the email program? ;-)

> I posted to David that the 650 has 2/2 mode which is essentially two
> duophonic modes if you set them up al Poly and on separate channels.

Try unison steal. I think that's what David is looking for.

-->Neil

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Neil Bradley            "If you owe the bank $100, it's your problem. If you
Synthcom Systems, Inc.   owe them $100mil, it's the bank's problem." - JP Getty

Re: 650 question

2006-04-04 by mate_stubb

I was referring to the yahoo list web interface, which I use instead
of being email bombed from all the lists I belong to.

In replying to your message, if I just hit send it will send it to you
via private email instead of the list, which is what you want 99% of
the time.

Moe

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, Neil Bradley <nb@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> > As long as I've been on this group I still make the same mistake: send
> > to poster instead of to the group. Crap. Either I'm stupid or the user
> > interface SUCKS.
> 
> On the 650 or the email program? ;-)
>

Re: [motm] Re: 650 question

2006-04-04 by synchro1

The list owner/moderator sets the reply preferences within the yahoo 
group.  The default can be reply to list or reply to sender.  The 
preferences have been debated endlessly on the groups since long 
before yahoo purchased them from (?, there's a senior moment, I've forgotten).

Anyway, a valuable life lesson is that in business or personal or 
public communication, you might want to *always* check the To: and 
CC: distribution lines prior to clicking "send".  A quick spell check 
is also helpful.

My (Fortune 500) company is awash in idiotic "me too" and "thanks" 
emails from people who think "reply to all" is a cool thing.

Meanwhile, I hope to receive my first MOTM gear soon (a 650 and a 
triple resonant filter).  These shall not be my last.

Take care,
Jim W.
San Mateo, CA

At 09:29 PM 4/3/2006, mate_stubb wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>I was referring to the yahoo list web interface, which I use instead
>of being email bombed from all the lists I belong to.
>
>In replying to your message, if I just hit send it will send it to you
>via private email instead of the list, which is what you want 99% of
>the time.
>
>Moe
>
>--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, Neil Bradley <nb@...> wrote:
> >
> > > As long as I've been on this group I still make the same mistake: send
> > > to poster instead of to the group. Crap. Either I'm stupid or the user
> > > interface SUCKS.
> >
> > On the 650 or the email program? ;-)
> >

Re: 650 question

2006-04-04 by David Holt

Sounds like it. The Oddysey did it by setting one oscillator to respond 
to the high note and one to the low note.  So if you hit only one key, 
you got both, but if you hit more than that, the highest went to one, 
the lowest to the other.  Will unison do that high/low allocation?  
When you're using two similar oscillators, it's no big deal, but when 
one is FMing, ring modulating, or synched to the other, that's where 
the magic happens and why it's important that one is consistantly high 
and one consistantly low.  Did that explain it?

-dave

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "mate_stubb" <mate_stubb@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Scott,
> 
> The 650 has Unison mode, which stacks all available channels across
> how many notes are played. Sounds like what you are asking for.
> 
> Moe

Re: 650 question

2006-04-04 by Mike Marsh

:)

Sorry to waste bandwidth complaining about it, though.

Mike

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "mate_stubb" <mate_stubb@...> wrote:
>
> You're not wrong. The interface sucks.
> 
> Moe
> --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Marsh" <michaelmarsh@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > As long as I've been on this group I still make the same mistake: send
> > to poster instead of to the group. Crap. Either I'm stupid or the user
> > interface SUCKS.
> > 
> > I posted to David that the 650 has 2/2 mode which is essentially two
> > duophonic modes if you set them up al Poly and on separate channels.
> > 
> > Mike
> > 
> > --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "David Holt" <dave_3283@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I was reading the early version of the '650 manual.  I thought
(and I 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> > > could be wrong) that it would do duophonic voice allocation ala the 
> > > Odyssey or Octave Cat.  Does it or do I misremember?
> > > 
> > > -dave
> > >
> >
>

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.