Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-03 01:33 UTC

Thread

Thanks for the photo help

Thanks for the photo help

2006-01-16 by Paul Schreiber

Thanks to all that assisted. I'm about to lay out the NAMM brochure (of which 
85% will wind up in the trash).

BTW: MOTM version of 'digital camera':

http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2500

Paul S.

Re: [motm] Thanks for the photo help

2006-01-16 by john mahoney

> ... MOTM version of 'digital camera':
>
> http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2500

Feh... I don't see any CV inputs. ;-)

Knock 'em dead at NAMM!  (Can I have a copy of the brochure if I promise not
to throw it away?)
--
john

650 Current Draw

2006-01-16 by xamboldt

Does anyone know how much current the 650 will draw (in particular at  
5V)?

Thanks,
Chris

Re: [motm] 650 Current Draw

2006-01-16 by Paul Schreiber

The +5V current is dependent on the backlight. There are several levels of LED 
brightness. Att maximum, the +5V current is around 300ma. When the backlight is 
off, the draw is around 65ma.

The +15V/-15V current draw is quite small. I'd guess 30ma for each.

Paul S.

Re: [motm] Thanks for the photo help

2006-01-16 by John Laudicina

Of course you realize this new Hasselblad is made by
Fuji, not zies lenses like the original, That is why I
still shoot with original with a phase one digital
back.  The joke of all of this is when you shoot a
39mp shot unless you are doing a billboard you down
size the files or it will crash most computers when
the art director tries to open the files to edit. 
When I shoot with mine I have to write the images to 2
file sizes so the ad views the small 5 mb shots then
chooses the one he likes then opens it up.  
Our technology is out of hand and as for being a
professionnal photographer we cant afford to
constantly up grade, I guess it is the same in all
professions, they want us all broke.  I feel sorry for
anyone who wants to be a photographer now days.

Paul when you get that system then you need the
lights...  another ball of wax

Most publishing software doesnt show the images like
they look in photoshop, they do print right, at least
with Quarkexpress this is so.
john

--- Paul Schreiber <synth1@...> wrote:

> Thanks to all that assisted. I'm about to lay out
> the NAMM brochure (of which 
> 85% will wind up in the trash).
> 
> BTW: MOTM version of 'digital camera':
> 
> http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2500
> 
> Paul S.
> 
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com