MOTM-440 pix posted
2005-01-03 by Paul Schreiber
Yahoo Groups archive
Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC
Thread
2005-01-03 by Paul Schreiber
Thanks to D. Brown, here is a good shot of an assembled MOTM-440: www.synthtech.com/misc/motm440.jpg Paul S.
2005-01-04 by Jeff Laity
Thanks, everyone, for your on- and off-list responses. It looks like the 440 has a higher part count, and many of these parts are multi-pin ICs. There appears to a temperature-regulation resistor on there as well. I was worried that I needed an oscilloscope to set it up or something like the 300 osc modules. As I said, I'll probably end up with both anyway, so perhaps I should just start with the simpler one so I don't get discouraged. I've built a few DIY projects before, though, and some of them even work! Paul, does this kit use vintage/out of production SSM parts? Maybe that's another reason to hold off on the project: I wouldn't want to smoke one of the last remaining SSM chips. I can hear the difference between Dotcom and MOTM – if I couldn't, I wouldn't even consider MOTM. The price difference seems to be about 3:2, so the question is either more modules or better modules. But if I'm not going to build the best-sounding modular synth out there, why do it at all? :)
On Jan 2, 2005, at 9:25 PM, Paul Schreiber wrote: > Thanks to D. Brown, here is a good shot of an assembled MOTM-440: > > www.synthtech.com/misc/motm440.jpg > > Paul S. > > >
2005-01-04 by Paul Schreiber
2005-01-04 by Mike Estee
> Thanks, everyone, for your on- and off-list responses. It looks like > the 440 has a higher part count, and many of these parts are multi-pin > ICs. There appears to a temperature-regulation resistor on there as > well. I was worried that I needed an oscilloscope to set it up or > something like Oh, that part is easy. The most difficult part about MOTM assemble is keeping in mind that there are parts you can wash, and parts you can't (and a different solder for each kind.) Just don't mess those up and your ok. As a tip: I insert all my resistors and axial caps before I do the first solder. This way when I'm picking parts if I find that one doesn't match that probably means there's another one that doesn't match elsewhere. It's a lot easier to fix misplaced parts *before* you solder them down. Another tip: presort your resistors. I presort all like resistors out into their own piles before assembling. It makes the whole process go a *lot* faster, and reduces errors. > the 300 osc modules. As I said, I'll probably end up with both anyway, > so perhaps I should just start with the simpler one so I don't get > discouraged. I've built a few DIY projects before, though, and some of > them even work! > > Paul, does this kit use vintage/out of production SSM parts? Maybe > that's another reason to hold off on the project: I wouldn't want to > smoke one of the last remaining SSM chips. > > I can hear the difference between Dotcom and MOTM – if I couldn't, I > wouldn't even consider MOTM. The price difference seems to be about > 3:2, so the question is either more modules or better modules. But if > I'm not going to build the best-sounding modular synth out there, why > do it at all? :) Another interesting observation: MOTM synths maintain there value *very* well. It all depends on the soldering skills of the assembler of course, but as a general rule used modules are worth the same as new ones. Keep that in mind when you're putting your modules together, take your time! Double check your work, and work in phases to reduce error (i.e. take a frickin' break!) Does anyone know of any online soldering resources for beginners? I know of this one: http://www.circuittechctr.com/guides/guides.shtml If someone wants to host it, I'll record a video of assembling a MOTM 300. --mikes