MOTM

Thank you very much to all who have commented.  I decided to have my
mults on a 1U 19" rack panel along with other I/O.  So I do have two
MOTM spaces to fill.  A few people mentioned the MOTM-390 and MOTM-490
combination as being a good addition to my system.

I agree.  As George mentioned the MOTM-410 module has an LFO.  What is
the group thought on a single 410 versus a 390 and 490?

Thanks again to everyone!  Please let me know if I'm using up too much
bandwidth here.

Ivan

Ivan, you won't have external access to the two LFOs in the 410 without a
Tony Allgood OMS-410 companion.  The LFOs are for internal use only.
(heh)

George

----- Original Message ----- 

From: "ivancu2" <ivancu@...>
To: <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 6:45 PM
Subject: Re: [motm] Small MOTM system - 410 vs 390/490


> Thank you very much to all who have commented.  I decided to have my
> mults on a 1U 19" rack panel along with other I/O.  So I do have two
> MOTM spaces to fill.  A few people mentioned the MOTM-390 and MOTM-490
> combination as being a good addition to my system.
>
> I agree.  As George mentioned the MOTM-410 module has an LFO.  What is
> the group thought on a single 410 versus a 390 and 490?
>
> Thanks again to everyone!  Please let me know if I'm using up too much
> bandwidth here.
>
> Ivan

Very good point; thanks!

Ivan

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, <groovyshaman@s...> wrote:
> Ivan, you won't have external access to the two LFOs in the 410
without a Tony Allgood OMS-410 companion.  The LFOs are for internal
use only. (heh)
> 
> George