MOTM

I was looking at the uSeq on the MOTM website, and it got me 
wondering: could the MIDI port be used to connect a MIDI controller 
with assignable pots to control the sequencer's functions? I'm really 
looking forward to having all the versatility of this module, but at 
the same time I really prefer to have pots for control rather than 
menus, and I'll bet there are others who feel the same way. Mr. 
Shreiber?
~Terry

I would be one of those that feel like it would be HUGE if the uSEQ
responded to MIDI CC messages while it was running.  Paul is this something
that the hardware would support in some future operating system release?
Larry H

----- Original Message -----
From: xiphiguy <tahrens@...>
I was looking at the uSeq on the MOTM website, and it got me wondering:
could the MIDI port be used to connect a MIDI controller with assignable
pots to control the sequencer's functions? I'm really looking forward to
having all the versatility of this module, but at the same time I really
prefer to have pots for control rather than menus, and I'll bet there are
others who feel the same way.

Please forgive my misspelling your name, Mr. Schreiber.
Chalk it up to momentary blindness: it seems I was unable to "C" ;)
~Terry



--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "xiphiguy" <tahrens@s...> wrote:
> I was looking at the uSeq on the MOTM website, and it got me 
> wondering: could the MIDI port be used to connect a MIDI controller 
> with assignable pots to control the sequencer's functions? I'm 
really 
> looking forward to having all the versatility of this module, but 
at 

> the same time I really prefer to have pots for control rather than 
> menus, and I'll bet there are others who feel the same way. Mr. 
> Shreiber?
> ~Terry

> I was looking at the uSeq on the MOTM website, and it got me
> wondering: could the MIDI port be used to connect a MIDI controller
> with assignable pots to control the sequencer's functions?

In the current software definition (and being a definition, subject to changes),
there are some MIDI messages that the uSeq will respond to. Right now, they
mainly have to do with "transport controls", such as Start, Stop, Continue,
Change Program and MIDI Clock.

I suppose it would not be that difficult to pick some CC messages and assign
them to things like Tempo, Gate Time and Sequence Length.

Paul S.

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Paul Schreiber <synth1@...>
> In the current software definition (and being a definition, subject to
changes), there are some MIDI messages that the uSeq will respond to. Right
now, they mainly have to do with "transport controls", such as Start, Stop,
Continue, Change Program and MIDI Clock.

Those are all good things. :)

> I suppose it would not be that difficult to pick some CC messages and
assign them to things like Tempo, Gate Time and Sequence Length.

Well, certainly it would not be appropriate in MOTM land to call any new
function into service that would be described as "not too difficult."
Thinking in terms of being a real pain in the ass, what are things we could
put on the wish list -- actually reaching in an changing the tuning of one
of the CV outs?  Humm?  :)

Afterall, it's just code ......

ROTFLMAO
Sorry, I just could not resist.
Stooge Larry

This would be *EXTREMELY* useful!

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@a...> wrote:
> > I was looking at the uSeq on the MOTM website, and it got me
> > wondering: could the MIDI port be used to connect a MIDI 
controller
> > with assignable pots to control the sequencer's functions?
> 
> In the current software definition (and being a definition, subject 
to changes),
> there are some MIDI messages that the uSeq will respond to. Right 
now, they
> mainly have to do with "transport controls", such as Start, Stop, 
Continue,
> Change Program and MIDI Clock.
> 
> I suppose it would not be that difficult to pick some CC messages 
and assign

> them to things like Tempo, Gate Time and Sequence Length.
> 
> Paul S.