Re: Mixer idea (That's a s***tload of wiring)
1999-03-11 by JWBarlow@xxx.xxx
Yahoo Groups archive
Archive for motm.
Index last updated: 2026-03-30 01:13 UTC
Thread
1999-03-11 by JWBarlow@xxx.xxx
1999-03-11 by Dave Bradley
>Doesn't Paul's design call for 7 knobs (3 input levels x 2, 1 dual ganged
> From: JWBarlow@...
>
> Hi Paul (everyone),
>
> Mixer is sounding great! I hadn't even thought about output pots;
> so here is
> my two cents (I'm with you, Paul, on 6 knobs, 8 jacks).
> 1) a switch which defeats output level pot on output 2 or (better)You are saying to normal the inputs of mixer 2 to mixer 1. I like the idea,
> 2) a DPDT 3 position switch which defeats either output level
> control 1 or 2
> (both active in the middle position).
> 3) Input 1 to NC input 4
> input 2 to NC input 5
> input 3 to NC input 6
> (do you guys see what I'm on about here?)
> Then you'd have a 6x1 or (3x1)x2 or 3x2 (stereo output) mixer: the fullYou know, it seems like we started talking about a 6x1 mixer, but the 3x1x2
> utility mixer!
1999-03-12 by JWBarlow@xxx.xxx
>I swear this is the last I will say on the subject of a simple mixer.I was wrong (7 knobs, 8 jacks and 2 switches -- and yes two switches can fit
>Doesn't Paul's design call for 7 knobs (3 input levels x 2, 1 dual ganged
>
>output level), 8 jacks?
>> From: JWBarlow@...
>> my two cents (I'm with you, Paul, on 6 knobs, 8 jacks).
>EXACTLY! And I will too (but a s***tload of ver short wiring).
>You are saying to normal the inputs of mixer 2 to mixer 1. I like the idea,
>
>but I can just hear Paul: "That's a s***tload of wiring!" I'd probably make
>
>the mod anyway.