Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Thread

I've finished my MOTM.. for now?

I've finished my MOTM.. for now?

2003-10-11 by foraxx

I posted a picture of this a while back, but it is now complete.
Check out my signal processing system at:
http://users.ev1.net/~puttersonly/motm/

Hopefully I can turn this into a fully fledged synth one day.

Re: [motm] I've finished my MOTM.. for now?

2003-10-11 by Richard Brewster

Very nice little box.  I'm curious why you chose a MOTM-420 filter instead 
of a MOTM-410, which would seem to be more oriented to signal 
processing.  Well, you can always get a 410 and swap it in at any 
point.  That's the beauty of modulars!

-Richard Brewster

At 03:40 AM 10/11/03 +0000, foraxx wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>I posted a picture of this a while back, but it is now complete.
>Check out my signal processing system at:
>http://users.ev1.net/~puttersonly/motm/
>
>Hopefully I can turn this into a fully fledged synth one day.
>

Re: I've finished my MOTM.. for now?

2003-10-11 by foraxx

The 410 would have been a really nice choice now that I think about 
it, but I really liked the filter of my old Korg MS-10 and I wanted 
to have bandpass and highpass as well.  I also eventually want to add 
a VCO & VCA.  The 420 seems more suited to getting a basic voice up 
and running.

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, Richard Brewster <pugix@n...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Very nice little box.  I'm curious why you chose a MOTM-420 filter 
>instead  of a MOTM-410, which would seem to be more oriented to 
>signal processing.  Well, you can always get a 410 and swap it in at 
>any point.  That's the beauty of modulars!

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.