Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Thread

Fantastic new MOTM demos /paging Mr. Aardvark

Fantastic new MOTM demos /paging Mr. Aardvark

2002-10-10 by Paul Schreiber

Please visit the following link:

http://www.midiwall.com/aleatoric/results.html

And listen to the 3 MOTM entries by Norm Fay, Andrew Sanchez and Ken Elhardt. Listen to the 2
others and you will hear why MOTM is the best modular out there. If you like old school Wendy
Carlos, Ken's timbres in the section towards the end will make you swear he used a sampler off of
"The Well-Tempered Synthesizer". Norm's recording quality really shines, and Andrew's piece is a
real speaker workout.

BTW: this was a contest to "guess the synth" and I was 4 out of 5 (thought the Wiard was a
Blacet).

I really appreciate you guys taking the time to do this, and being loyal customers. I know times
are tough, and MOTM is a pure luxury for most of you. I'm still designing those 500 Series and
that 600 Series uSequencer (there!) modules for next Spring. Save those pennies!

A. Wagner, please call me sometime.

Paul S.

[motm] Re: Fantastic new MOTM demos /paging Mr. Aardvark

2002-10-10 by Simon

>  >MOTM is the best modular out there.
>
>One gloat a year ol' Paul? Hmm. I think you've run out for the next
>decade.
>
>Your true character will surface once more when this message
>dissapears from the archive, like so many others have.

Someone's a little paranoid!


>And yes, Mr. Schrieber, you are still an...

Troll! Why waste your time here if your just going to be such a 
little bitch...been hangin' with Mr.P too much I think.


Simon
Canberra
AUSTRALIA

Re: Fantastic new MOTM demos /paging Mr. Aardvark

2002-10-10 by synthbaron

>MOTM is the best modular out there.

One gloat a year ol' Paul? Hmm. I think you've run out for the next 
decade.

Your true character will surface once more when this message 
dissapears from the archive, like so many others have.

And yes, Mr. Schrieber, you are still an...
Jay

Re: [motm] Re: Fantastic new MOTM demos /paging Mr. Aardvark

2002-10-10 by Mike Fisher

I'm pretty sure that I'll regret posting this, but oh well- what the 
hell. Sometimes I just gotta.

<asbestos suit>

Just to get this out of the way, I don't endorse the previous 
post/troll about Paul's response to the competition. Name calling is 
just dumb.

Separately, I have to say that sometimes some of Paul's comments leave 
me scratching my head in confusion.

To my mind, saying that MOTM is "the best modular" is sort of like 
saying that a cello is "the best instrument", or that Kandinsky is "the 
best painter". It just seems non-sensical to me.

Don't get me wrong - Paul has every reason to be proud of his 
accomplishments. And MOTM is a great modular. I like mine a lot, and 
expect to continue adding to it.

However... right there next to my MOTM sits Wiard, and Doepfer and 
Blacet too. Each has its strong points, and its weaknesses. Doepfer is 
probably the most affordable. Wiard is probably the most 
multi-functional, and so on. That doesn't make any of them "the best 
modular". Likewise, the fact that Doepfer construction is obviously of 
a lower quality than that of MOTM (and most others) doesn't make 
Doepfer "the worst" modular, because depending on what you're doing 
with it, other factors may offset this downside. Every system is good 
in some sense, and not as good in another. In other words, they're all 
-DIFFERENT-.

There's no doubt in my mind that MOTM is "the best modular" for some 
people (and depending on the context, that sometimes includes me). But 
that's (importantly) different from saying that it's "the best modular".

I propose that we all (and this includes, ahem, the manufacturers) 
adopt a more ecumenical, inclusive approach to the discussion of 
synthesis and its instruments. Assuming that we generally consider a 
modular synthesizer to be a musical instrument, rather than simply the 
sum of its parts, claiming superiority in an arena where the final word 
is invariably subjective just doesn't make sense. It also doesn't 
advance the discussion, IMHO. In fact it really seems to have the 
opposite effect, often resulting in alienation and fodder for yet more 
flame wars.

</asbestos suit>

Re: [motm] Re: Fantastic new MOTM demos /paging Mr. Aardvark

2002-10-10 by J. Larry Hendry

Gloat ?!?  Hardly.  Come on dudes.  This is not the AH list, or Gas Station
or some other vendor's list.  A guy should be able to say his stuff is "the
best"  on his own users list without being called names.  Nowhere in the
statement is there one negative thing said about anyone else's fine stuff.

True, there is no one size fits all.  But, MOTM "is" the best by the
criteria by which Paul chooses to judge his stuff.  So, it is the best to
him, and me, and many others on this list.  That does not mean others are
not great too.  I love some of my non-MOTM stuff. Heck, no one makes a
better vocoder the  PAiA in the < $150 price range.  So, John and Craig can
say it is the best by their criteria (low price). The Blacet Time Machine is
the "best" BDD type toy I have ever owned.

Jay,  You don't see MOTMer's on the dot com list over there making such rude
comments.  Go troll on gas station and keep your childish comments off this
list please.  I doubt anyone here gives a damn what you think.

Larry Hendry
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: synthbaron <synthbaron@...>
One gloat a year ol' Paul? Hmm. I think you've run out for the next decade.
Your true character will surface once more when this message dissapears from
the archive, like so many others have.
And yes, Mr. Schrieber, you are still an...
Jay

From: Mike Fisher <mbfisher@...>
To my mind, saying that MOTM is "the best modular" is sort of like
saying that a cello is "the best instrument", or that Kandinsky is "the
best painter". It just seems non-sensical to me.

Re: Fantastic new MOTM demos /paging Mr. Aardvark

2002-10-10 by Mike Marsh

> Go troll on gas station and keep your childish comments off this
> list please.  I doubt anyone here gives a damn what you think.
> 
> Larry Hendry

Right.  I wouldn't give a rat's ass for folks that post stuff like 
this.

Mike

Re: [motm] Re: Fantastic new MOTM demos /paging Mr. Aardvark

2002-10-10 by groovyshaman@snet.net

I'm sure Elhardt could patch up the sound of a rat's ass.
He already has the breath controller thingy down pat.

:)

George

----- Original Message ----- 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Mike Marsh <mmarsh@...>
To: <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 5:30 PM
Subject: [motm] Re: Fantastic new MOTM demos /paging Mr. Aardvark


> > Go troll on gas station and keep your childish comments off this
> > list please.  I doubt anyone here gives a damn what you think.
> > 
> > Larry Hendry
> 
> Right.  I wouldn't give a rat's ass for folks that post stuff like 
> this.
> 
> Mike

Re: [motm] Re: Fantastic new MOTM demos /paging Mr. Aardvark

2002-10-11 by J. Larry Hendry

No doubt.  I think Elhardt can patch anything :)
Larry
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <groovyshaman@...>
To: <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: [motm] Re: Fantastic new MOTM demos /paging Mr. Aardvark


I'm sure Elhardt could patch up the sound of a rat's ass.
He already has the breath controller thingy down pat.

:)

George

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Mike Marsh <mmarsh@...>
To: <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 5:30 PM
Subject: [motm] Re: Fantastic new MOTM demos /paging Mr. Aardvark


> > Go troll on gas station and keep your childish comments off this
> > list please.  I doubt anyone here gives a damn what you think.
> > 
> > Larry Hendry
> 
> Right.  I wouldn't give a rat's ass for folks that post stuff like 
> this.
> 
> Mike




 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

RE: [motm] Re: Fantastic new MOTM demos /paging Mr. Aardvark

2002-10-11 by Brousseau, Paul E (Paul)

Think he can patch my bicycle's tire?  It's a little flat.  (Hmmm, maybe my BCOs-- bicycle controller oscillators-- just need calibration...)

--PBr
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: J. Larry Hendry [mailto:jlarryh@...]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 6:34 PM
To: MOTM List
Subject: Re: [motm] Re: Fantastic new MOTM demos /paging Mr. Aardvark


No doubt.  I think Elhardt can patch anything :)

Re: Fantastic new MOTM demos /paging Mr. Aardvark

2002-10-11 by Mike Marsh

heh heh heh

BTW, I really enjoyed *all* the entries in that contest.  What a 
talented bunch of folks...

Mike

--- In motm@y..., <groovyshaman@s...> wrote:
> I'm sure Elhardt could patch up the sound of a rat's ass.
> He already has the breath controller thingy down pat.
> 
> :)
> 
> George
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: Mike Marsh <mmarsh@s...>
> To: <motm@y...>
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 5:30 PM
> Subject: [motm] Re: Fantastic new MOTM demos /paging Mr. Aardvark
> 
> 
> > > Go troll on gas station and keep your childish comments off 
this
> > > list please.  I doubt anyone here gives a damn what you think.
> > > 
> > > Larry Hendry
> > 
> > Right.  I wouldn't give a rat's ass for folks that post stuff 
like 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> > this.
> > 
> > Mike

Re: Fantastic new MOTM demos /paging Mr. Aardvark

2002-10-11 by synthbaron

--- In motm@y..., "Scott Evans, Gen Mgr" <esresource@e...> 
wrote:
> Congratulations Jay! (synthbaron)
> 
> You just hit my Kill filter!
> 
> Scott

Wohoo! My first kill file entry...

Folow thy leader.
Jay

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.