MOTM

95% sure this is the final version:

www.synthtech.com/misc/m450.jpg

Paul S.

What happened to the vote (poll) results on this one? I could have sworn the 
standard formatted panel won the popularity poll. just curious

Thomas "Back Burner" White

PS. Heres a new vote... How many current MOTM customers wish they had more 
money for modules since all this new stuff is coming out? 1 vote for "Me"


>From: "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...>
>To: "MOTM listserv" <motm@yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: [motm] MOTM-450 mockup
>Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 22:53:20 -0500
>
>95% sure this is the final version:
>
>www.synthtech.com/misc/m450.jpg
>
>Paul S.
>
>




_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: 
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx

I meant all the pots no lower than four rows down and jacks on the bottom 
etc. you know, like every other module in the line up JK HA! I do remember 
some controversy surrounding one side of the group wanting it one way and 
the other tragically opposite

Thomas White


>From: "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...>
>To: "thomas white" <djthomaswhite@...>
>Subject: Re: [motm] MOTM-450 mockup
>Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 11:33:50 -0500
>
>It *won't fit* with standard spacing. The bottom pot hits the rack rail.
>
>Paul S.
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "thomas white" <djthomaswhite@...>
>To: <motm@yahoogroups.com>
>Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 11:23 AM
>Subject: Re: [motm] MOTM-450 mockup
>
>
> > What happened to the vote (poll) results on this one? I could have sworn 
>the
> > standard formatted panel won the popularity poll. just curious
> >
> > Thomas "Back Burner" White
> >
> > PS. Heres a new vote... How many current MOTM customers wish they had 
>more
> > money for modules since all this new stuff is coming out? 1 vote for 
>"Me"
> >
> >
> > >From: "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...>
> > >To: "MOTM listserv" <motm@yahoogroups.com>
> > >Subject: [motm] MOTM-450 mockup
> > >Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 22:53:20 -0500
> > >
> > >95% sure this is the final version:
> > >
> > >www.synthtech.com/misc/m450.jpg
> > >
> > >Paul S.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
> > http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >




_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: 
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx

On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, thomas white wrote:

> I meant all the pots no lower than four rows down and jacks on the bottom 
> etc. you know, like every other module in the line up JK HA! I do remember 
> some controversy surrounding one side of the group wanting it one way and 
> the other tragically opposite
> 
"Poll" values are here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/motm/surveys?id=900259

However, I find the front panel layout at
http://www.synthtech.com/misc/m450.jpg
to be much easier to navigate and than the one at
http://www.hotrodmotm.com/images/motm/m-450_3U_3row1.jpg

Jeff

Speaking to the differences between the "two columns of five pots" 
versus "3 columns" layout, notice that since that poll Paul has added 
an extra pot, for MIX. That would be almost impossible to fit into 
the "3 columns" scheme we were thinking about back then.

The current arrangement of bands (left to right, top to bottom) 
mirrors the Moog filter banks.

Moe

In my opinion, this layout looks the best so far.  And the bypass and mix
controls are icing on the proverbial cake.

George

----- Original Message -----

From: Paul Schreiber <synth1@...>
To: MOTM listserv <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 11:53 PM
Subject: [motm] MOTM-450 mockup


> 95% sure this is the final version:
>
> www.synthtech.com/misc/m450.jpg
>
> Paul S.