Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-03-31 23:28 UTC

Thread

Re: modules review

Re: modules review

2002-06-19 by Len DeFazio

Here is the complete response of Roger to the review of his new modules
posted to this list, as he as posted to his list:
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 16:23:07 -0000
From: "roboroger" <rarrick@...>
Subject: New module review

There should be no problem finding the review, the competetion has
captured the moment and reposted it on their forum. I suppose it
makes others look and feel better. Makes me feel terrible if anyone
cares. It's the only thing I've thought about for the last 24 hours.
Someone should tell Margo, she thinks a friend died or something.


Q123 Standards:
I was never contacted about of this issue. Too bad because it's a
simple resistor value problem on 1 drawing and took only 10 minuites
to find after I read the review. A batch of boards around here has as
many has 25,000 resistors. Looks like 4 of the Q123's I shipped have
this wrong resistor in the 'add in' summer which accounts for that
problem. The prototype and preproduction run worked fine so beta
testing wouldn't have caught this. Of course I'll be offering a fix
for free including shipping, prompt and polite. Hopefully you get the
same kind of service from Microsoft, CompUSA, General Motors. Or
maybe you get endless denials and "sorry sir our system won't
allow..." :)

I'm sorry some feel the freqency and voltage standards shouldn't be on
the same module. If there was a universal format/layout that would
make all happy I would do it. I threw away many customers by even
using the moog panel size, my using +15/-15/+5 power, by using 1/4"
jacks, by selecting the company name, etc.


Q161 Oscillator Mixer, Q162 Filter Mixer:
These are not really new modules at all, but simply new panels for the
Q112/Q113 PCB. I found myself using mixers this way and decided to
offer these modules because it was simple to do and some people were
wanting to reduce patchcords. I hope no one feels like they are
required in their systems. Notch and BP are (ALMOST) mutually
exclusive when used full force but you get to control the value of
each and that is something you have to use a mixer for.


Q127 Fixed Filter Bank:
This filter was inspired by the Moog 914 but uses common opamp filters
instead of big coils. I borrowed Eric Norlander's and plotted the
responses. If I had used coils, this discussion would be about the
$1200 price tag. But now I'm faced with the issue that with all the
knobs off there is feed through (sort of like a no-pass filter :) and
the highs are getting through. Even though the all-off condition is
not very useful, it's an issue for some and I respect that. I
specifically did this because I got tired of putting low pass filters
on every output for dampening. Has anyone ever looked at a moog
modular on a scope? Spikes, overshoots, crosstalk everwhere.
It looks like an electron battlefield. I believe this is part of that
great moog sound, it's not perfect which is good. Look at a triangle
wave on a digital synth - almost perfect, like smooth plastic, not
american walnut. Right now I'm working on a mod to change that
response on the Q127 for any what wish. Yes, it will be free
including shipping, and a smile :)


Q140 Fixed Filter Aid:
Simply cables coming from the Q127 filter to a panel. Haven't seen
other modulars offer this and thought it was a good idea. The signals
are attenuated by 75% because of the way the Q127 filters work, which
means they might be 2.5V PP which is still larger than the moog
systems. Making them a full 10V PP could become an issue since they
are likely to be mixed anyway.


Q143 Preset Module:
This module was specifically ask for by one of my friendly customers
and it was a simple and clean implementation. I'm happy and my
customer is happy but doing small specials like this might be
making me a lot of enemies, and I didn't foresee that. I'll probably
only sell 10 of these a year so it's a financial loss.


Q146 Normalization:
This module is bascially a panel with a bunch of wires. Requested by
a very small number of my customers for patchcord clutter. Frankly,
it violates some of the hyper-modularity concepts that I had sought
for this system. It's not designed to be a multi-cabinet solution.
Again, I might have somehow turned off more customers than I gained
which suprises me.


The design and manufacturing process is blanketed with potholes.
I don't pretent to be great at either. This is especially true of
low-volume products like analog synthesizers. It's very difficult to
stay in business and it's difficult to work all year and not make very
much money. But I do handle issues/problems responsibly and ethicly.
As everyone knows who has done business with me, you're welcome to a
refund if not happy with any of my products or service. As it sits
now, the latest batch of modules will probably be a financial disaster
for more than a year. This is mainly because I rely on my customers
(happy and unhappy) for promotion, not $10K/mo ads in magazines. I
probably should have used that time with the kids. I'm often asked
why I do this, frankly I'm not sure anymore. My skin is way to thin,
but that's my problem.

Peace,

R



Show quoted textHide quoted text
> > stuff he mentioned in his post, and then some. As a synth it kind
> > of sucks, but as a processor it's really great. And it has a cool
> > interface!
> >
> > Mike
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
>

Re: [motm] Re: modules review

2002-06-19 by Sikorsky

hello all,

well, we all make mistakes
roger is dead unhappy about stuff that slipped the net
paul s is dead unhappy about stuff he misses
tony allgood is dead unhappy about stuff he misses
tony k is dead unhappy about stuff he misses
ken stone is dead unhappy about stuff he misses (and there's a lot, but i
just don't care)

we all send emails that seemed like a good idea at the time (especially on a
caffeine rush)

at the end of the day - to us it's just a synthesiser, to paul, roger et al
it's more than a job, it's almost a personal crusade
ho hum...

anyway - does anyone have a schematic & notes for the EFM pitch to voltage
convertor..? 'they've' been dead unhelpful

cheers
paul b
sheffield
uk

Re: [motm] Re: modules review

2002-06-19 by Sikorsky

----- Original Message -----
From: <jhaible@...>
> Just my opinion, of course.

of course opinions count for nothing in flame wars
nevermind,
i'd love to see the interpolating scanner in motm form
maybe one of the mystical 500 series..?

cheers
paul b
sheffield
uk

[motm] Re: modules review

2002-06-19 by Simon

Roger says...
>My skin is way to thin,


We're lucky Paul has thicker skin.

I doubt Roger could have handled the type of public MOTM bashing Paul
received from Mr.P on AH.

I think Roger should take it a little less personally, but I suppose
that must be hard when someone is putting down your creations in
public.


Simon
Canberra
AUSTRALIA

Re: [motm] Re: modules review

2002-06-19 by vulture.squadron@syol.com

> Roger says...
> >My skin is way to thin,

hello all,
please no one quote me on this
but i believe paul & roger have a good 'working' relationship

as 'manufacturers' they work very hard to provide the things we cherish so
much

any arguement between paul, roger or any other manufacturer is their problem

i don't really think a 'user' can comment too much on this as we are not
involved in the process other than our lust for the equipment

if people want to start attacking certain manufacturing companies, they
should certainly leave the one man operation synth companies till last, and
i'm thinking macdonalds, enron, gap here. anything else is just pathetic,
really...

...ah, sorry chaps but something (and i don't know what) has happened and i
don't want this list to go the way of so many other lists...

cheers
paul b

Re: Re: modules review

2002-06-21 by sasami@hotkey.net.au

>hello all,
>
>well, we all make mistakes
>roger is dead unhappy about stuff that slipped the net
>paul s is dead unhappy about stuff he misses
>tony allgood is dead unhappy about stuff he misses
>tony k is dead unhappy about stuff he misses
>ken stone is dead unhappy about stuff he misses (and there's a lot, but i
>just don't care)

Hey! I resemble that remark!

Seriously, if you spot something, email me!

Ken
_______________________________________________________________________
Ken Stone sasami@...
Modular Synth PCBs for sale <http://www.blaze.net.au/~sasami/synth/>
Australian Miniature Horses & Ponies <http://www.blaze.net.au/~sasami/>

Re: [motm] Re: Re: modules review

2002-06-21 by vulture.squadron@syol.com

----- Original Message -----
From: <sasami@...>
> >ken stone is dead unhappy about stuff he misses (and there's a lot, but i
> >just don't care)
>
> Hey! I resemble that remark!

ah ha - lurker ahoy..?
sorry, what i meant was the board errors that you'd already documented - at
that particular moment in time i was trying to locate the track cut for
voltage controlled divider - i only realised last night that i had a revised
board.
ken, i hope there's no offence taken - there's been a lot of flying around
lately

cheers
paul b
sheffield
ku

Re: modules review

2002-06-23 by sasami@hotkey.net.au

>----- Original Message -----
>From: <sasami@...>
>> >ken stone is dead unhappy about stuff he misses (and there's a lot, but i
>> >just don't care)
>>
>> Hey! I resemble that remark!
>
>ah ha - lurker ahoy..?

well... yeah. I actually do own a couple of MOTM modules...

>sorry, what i meant was the board errors that you'd already documented - at
>that particular moment in time i was trying to locate the track cut for
>voltage controlled divider - i only realised last night that i had a revised
>board.
>ken, i hope there's no offence taken - there's been a lot of flying around
>lately

No offence taken.

Cheers,

Ken

>
>cheers
>paul b
>sheffield
>ku
_______________________________________________________________________
Ken Stone sasami@...
Modular Synth PCBs for sale <http://www.blaze.net.au/~sasami/synth/>
Australian Miniature Horses & Ponies <http://www.blaze.net.au/~sasami/>