Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-05 20:20 UTC

Thread

320 In Audio Range

320 In Audio Range

2002-05-11 by coyoteous

How well does this work, as well as the 300 over the range it 
covers? If so, It could be a cool bass VCO and different than the 
300/310 with addition of the of the Shape modulation.

Barry

Re: [motm] 320 In Audio Range

2002-05-11 by Paul Schreiber

It is not very good above A880. The tracking will be off too much above middle C. Below middle C,
it may be OK, but this is NOT a trimmed setting. Your '320 may be 5% off another '320.

<Paul S>

----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "coyoteous" <satori@...>
To: <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 7:26 PM
Subject: [motm] 320 In Audio Range


> How well does this work, as well as the 300 over the range it
> covers? If so, It could be a cool bass VCO and different than the
> 300/310 with addition of the of the Shape modulation.
>
> Barry
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

Re: [motm] 320 In Audio Range

2002-05-11 by J. Larry Hendry

I love to use my 320 in the bass range as a sub oscillator.  However, you
may find (and Paul told us too) that tracking is nor exactly perfect on all
320s as that was not a design feature.  "Close" is what it is supposed to
be.  Some people report theirs are right on.  Both mine are slightly off.
So, I use a frequency divider to sync my 320 in addition to driving it with
the 1/v oct signal.  I thought about trimming that input amp gain (like the
300), but it just doesn't seem important.
The 320 has always been one of my favorite modules.
Larry Hendry
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: coyoteous <satori@...>
To: <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 7:26 PM
Subject: [motm] 320 In Audio Range


How well does this work, as well as the 300 over the range it
covers? If so, It could be a cool bass VCO and different than the
300/310 with addition of the of the Shape modulation.

Barry





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: 320 In Audio Range

2002-05-11 by coyoteous

OK, it's worth a spin, though. It should be great for bass drones, 
at least.

Is Shape equivalent to PW for the pulse wave? What does it do to 
sine and saw? I'm guessing the saw transitions to tri then to 
ramp and the sine "leans" similarly?

I see the 380's upper limit is 35Hz, will the 390 go into the audio 
range?

Thanks, Barry

--- In motm@y..., "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@a...> wrote:
> It is not very good above A880. The tracking will be off too much 
above middle C. Below middle C,
> it may be OK, but this is NOT a trimmed setting. Your '320 may 
be 5% off another '320.
> 
> <Paul S>

Re: [motm] Re: 320 In Audio Range

2002-05-11 by J. Larry Hendry

Since is more difficult to explain.  I guess you could day one lobe gets fat
while the other is skinny and then they alternate going through a regular
sine.  I'm stuck for a better way to describe it.
Larry
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: coyoteous <satori@...>
To: <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 8:25 PM
Subject: [motm] Re: 320 In Audio Range


OK, it's worth a spin, though. It should be great for bass drones,
at least.

Is Shape equivalent to PW for the pulse wave? What does it do to
sine and saw? I'm guessing the saw transitions to tri then to
ramp and the sine "leans" similarly?

I see the 380's upper limit is 35Hz, will the 390 go into the audio
range?

Thanks, Barry

--- In motm@y..., "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@a...> wrote:
> It is not very good above A880. The tracking will be off too much
above middle C. Below middle C,
> it may be OK, but this is NOT a trimmed setting. Your '320 may
be 5% off another '320.
>
> <Paul S>





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [motm] 320 In Audio Range

2002-05-11 by George Kisslak

I use a 300->120 for this.

George
----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: coyoteous <satori@...>
To: <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 8:26 PM
Subject: [motm] 320 In Audio Range


> How well does this work, as well as the 300 over the range it
> covers? If so, It could be a cool bass VCO and different than the
> 300/310 with addition of the of the Shape modulation.
>
> Barry
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

Re: [motm] Re: 320 In Audio Range

2002-05-12 by Paul Schreiber

> Is Shape equivalent to PW for the pulse wave?

Yes.

 >What does it do to 
> sine and saw? I'm guessing the saw transitions to tri then to 
> ramp and the sine "leans" similarly?

Saw goes from \ to /
Sine sort of "rounds up" or "rounds down" the overall shape.


> 
> I see the 380's upper limit is 35Hz, will the 390 go into the audio 
> range?

The VC section will go up to maybe 300Hz.

<Paul S>

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.