Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Thread

Re: [motm] MOTM-450 escalation

Re: [motm] MOTM-450 escalation

2002-04-12 by Paul Schreiber

Just keep in mind, the goal is a *low-noise* design. And, who is to say this is the first and
*only* filter bank? I am still a vocoder fan, remember :)

I think 4U is too big, and just the logistics of handling/storage/shipping on my end is an issue.
And the panel alone would cost me $25ea.

I plan for this design to actually be 2 identical pc boards, with "stuffing options" on each for
the HP/LP section and the output summer. This is why the 2 vertical columns. There will be 2
Stooge-style brackets for the pcb support (held by pot nuts). I'm trying to keep the price
reasonable, some of you will want stereo/quad/5.1 no doubt. SIP resistor networks will reduce
overall parts handling/soldering and speed up kit building.

Paul S.

Re: [motm] MOTM-450 escalation

2002-04-12 by Scott Juskiw

At 10:15 AM -0500 2002/04/12, Paul Schreiber wrote:
>I plan for this design to actually be 2 identical pc boards, with 
>"stuffing options" on each for
>the HP/LP section and the output summer. This is why the 2 vertical 
>columns. There will be 2
>Stooge-style brackets for the pcb support (held by pot nuts). I'm 
>trying to keep the price
>reasonable, some of you will want stereo/quad/5.1 no doubt. SIP 
>resistor networks will reduce
>overall parts handling/soldering and speed up kit building.

Sounds like you may still be able to put the 8 bandpass pots in two 
columns using the "old" pot spacing, and put the lowpass and highpass 
pots off board in the third column along with the LED and switch. 
That would be my preference.

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.