MOTM

> ---JLH said---
> PS:  I very much agree with JHs statement that is should be complementary
to
> the 320.  We already have voltage control. We already have sync.  We
already
> have lots of shapes.  Something different please.

I also hope for something complementary.  But how does this jive with "I
need utilitarian, cheap.  I also need strange, but not for this homework
assignment." ??  I'm getting the feeling that this new line of uModules is
to better serve the portable-SKB crowd, by offering most of the 2U-wide
functions in 1U of space, not necessarally to offer complementary functions.

George

Here is riddle for you all.

Q:  How do you stop an entire group of rabbid MOTM fans from starting a
never ending discussion on micro-misxer functions?

A:  Start a discussion on micro LFO.

<snicker>
Larry

PS:  I very much agree with JHs statement that is should be complementary to
the 320.  We already have voltage control. We already have sync.  We already
have lots of shapes.  Something different please.

I also agree with Ken T. that the LFO default shape in my book is a sine
wave.  But, if you have multiple LFO waves as JH suggested, maybe two could
have one waveshape and two could have another (tri and sine?)

Well, if the micro series offers same than the 2U series all of suscribers
will get a kind of double modules...
We need something different...

Josue.


> I also hope for something complementary.  But how does this jive with "I
> need utilitarian, cheap.  I also need strange, but not for this homework
> assignment." ??  I'm getting the feeling that this new line of uModules is
> to better serve the portable-SKB crowd, by offering most of the 2U-wide
> functions in 1U of space, not necessarally to offer complementary
functions.
>
> George