MOTM

I guess You would have to give up the
PWM pot cause of the 1U space to get the
Sine out jack hugh? oh well..........
it was a thought.

I still like it.
                 Bill Hanson.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com

william Hanson wrote: 
> 
> I guess You would have to give up the
> PWM pot cause of the 1U space to get the
> Sine out jack hugh? oh well..........
> it was a thought.

I was pondering this also.  I was cooking up the idea of offering
4 outputs - pulse, saw, tri and sine.  Then just let the builder
pick which outputs to send to the front panel.  

The biggest problem with this is Front Panel labeling - the pulse
<might> be constant, but the other output would probably be 
labeled SAW (when it is really tri or sine).

Then we could have a square/tri arrangement for simple VC-LFO 
usage, or square/sine and use the sine for traditional additive 
synthesis.  Of course this would have us begging for the Quad-VCA
and for the gate-only Envelope Generators.

Regards,

Roy Tate
roytate@...
http://www.ionet.net/~roytate

The reason it's a cheaper, smaller version is that all of the waveshaping
circuitry
is left out!


Paul S.