Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Thread

MOMT-310 version

MOMT-310 version

2001-08-31 by Paul Schreiber

What I've decided is the PWM version, with 1 out. Ther is no VC blend (I
never said that!). Remember,
the intent is make a smaller, CHEAPER, VCO.

You will be able to use the '130 VCA for 2 signal blending (fade) and 1
signal splitting (pan).

Now I have to see if the circuitry will fit on a '800 pcb. It's a tight
squeeze, but I'll do a parts placement
over the weekend.

As you have noticed, there is a flurry of R&D now since NAMM is looming on
the horizon.

Paul S.

Re: [motm] MOMT-310 version

2001-08-31 by mark@indole.net

At 10:25 AM -0500 08/31/01, Paul Schreiber wrote:
>
>What I've decided is the PWM version, with 1 out. Ther is no VC blend (I
>never said that!). Remember,
>the intent is make a smaller, CHEAPER, VCO.

I'm no EE, but aren't pots one of the most expensive parts??  How about a
310 with no VC blend, but with...

3 knobs:

COARSE
FINE
FM (attenuator)

and

5 jacks:

1V/OCT
FM
PWM
SAW
PULSE

Would that work??  This way saw and pulse will both be available at the
same time -- a feature found on every VCO I have ever seen.

>You will be able to use the '130 VCA for 2 signal blending (fade) and 1
>signal splitting (pan).

You also sell a mixer, which could do the non-VC blending.

However, you cannot do any sort of blending, VC or otherwise, unless the
310 has at least two outputs to blend!!

So an additional output is much more useful than a blend knob.

>Now I have to see if the circuitry will fit on a '800 pcb. It's a tight
>squeeze, but I'll do a parts placement over the weekend.

Couldn't a regular sized PCB be mounted on the back of a 1U module??  Also
couldn't you order PCB's in any size you wanted??

>As you have noticed, there is a flurry of R&D now since NAMM is looming on
>the horizon.

Excellent :)

Re: [motm] MOMT-310 version

2001-08-31 by George Kisslak

----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: <mark@...>
>
> I'm no EE, but aren't pots one of the most expensive parts??  How about a
> 310 with no VC blend, but with...
>
> 3 knobs:
>
> COARSE
> FINE
> FM (attenuator)
>
> and
>
> 5 jacks:
>
> 1V/OCT
> FM
> PWM
> SAW
> PULSE
>
> Would that work??  This way saw and pulse will both be available at the
> same time -- a feature found on every VCO I have ever seen.
>
> You also sell a mixer, which could do the non-VC blending.

---- GK ----
Mark makes good points.  Having both saw and pulse outs would be preferable
to a manual blend knob, since one can manually blend using an 830, and a
cost savings would be beneficial.  I'm wondering if a 5th jack would
interfere with the PCB?  (When I look at the 800, it looks like it would
fit.)

George

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.