MOTM

I am one of the guys out here shooting for Polyphony so I vote for the 
micro-VCO. I will have each voice be one 300 VCO and one micro-VCO.

Of course I also would love to see the Dual VCA so I could pan freely 
without the bandpass effects of the 410 VCF. But my fever is for Polyphony 
and anybody with 2 110's can pan with the help of an inverter or 830 mixer 
using bias. Granted this is heavy module usage for the effect.

The pulse divider would also be very useful, but does not help me towards 
polyphony.

Maybe someone can look in the archives and outline the features of these 3 
potential modules

Thomas White
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

My votes:
(1) Dual VCA by a long shot.  I know my 110 has two VCA's in it, not just
one, but I would rather have two _different_ dual VCA modules than get
another 110.  (Hey Paul, I'm not on the subscribers list any more, so that
makes 21 :))

(2) If the remaining choices are fixed at uVCO or Divider, put me down for
the uVCO first.  Two 300s and two 310s sounds like a nice oscillator
section.  But I have to say that, rather than EITHER of these two, I would
rather see a couple other modules that have been bruited about for a
while, like the long awaited Preamp/Envelope Follower, or SEM filter,  or
Phase shifter, or (please don't hurt me) VC EG.  (Although the 820 helps
with the last.)

But please, pretty please, make us a 130 sometime soon.

peace, Chris Jeris