MOTM

In a message dated 01-03-28 00:54:38 EST, you write:

<< I am VERY interested in the article. >>


okay, you two gents were the only ones who answered on this post so you are 
the "lucky ( ? ) winners".
i only have one copy but, if i sent it to one of you, would you copy it and 
pass it along to the other party also ?
that way, you both could get one. seem fair ?
other than the good kharma from passing along a document someone might find 
interesting, i`m not looking for anything here - no postage, no nothing.
so, if it sounds good to you, send me a mailing address and i`ll get it out 
in the mail a.s.a.p..
best,
dave v.

--- In motm@y..., davevosh@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 01-03-28 00:54:38 EST, you write:
> 
> << I am VERY interested in the article. >>
> 
> 
> okay, you two gents were the only ones who answered on this post so you are 
> the "lucky ( ? ) winners".
> i only have one copy but, if i sent it to one of you, would you copy it and 
> pass it along to the other party also ?
> that way, you both could get one. seem fair ?
> other than the good kharma from passing along a document someone might find 
> interesting, i`m not looking for anything here - no postage, no nothing.
> so, if it sounds good to you, send me a mailing address and i`ll get it out 
> in the mail a.s.a.p..
> best,
> dave v.

If the winner could possibly scan it and post the file somewhere, I'd 
be interested in seeing it.

Chuck

In a message dated 3/28/01 5:16:19 PM, davevosh@... writes:

<< i only have one copy but, if i sent it to one of you, would you copy it 
and 
pass it along to the other party also ? >>

I don't have a collector's interest in having the original paper, so I would 
gladly take the copy.

Ivan

In a message dated 01-03-28 22:38:23 EST, you write:

<< 
 If the winner could possibly scan it and post the file somewhere, I'd 
 be interested in seeing it.
 
 Chuck
  >>


chuck,
certainly not something i`d have a negative reaction to but it would be up to 
them as i don`t have the ability to do so.  i don`t think any "intellectual" 
property rights are at risk here as the article is nearly 36 years old, i 
would think that any patents have long since expired and i`ve seen most of 
the circuitry reproduced other places over the years.
best,
dave v.

In a message dated 01-03-29 09:43:33 EST, you write:

<< 
 I don't have a collector's interest in having the original paper, so I would 
 gladly take the copy.
  >>


ivan,
it goes out in the mail tomorrow to todd so send him your mailing address.
little of "practical" value in an article so old but it does make interesting 
reading, sort of the first stumbling steps that lead to where we are today.
best,
dave v.

In a message dated 3/29/01 8:47:09 PM, davevosh@... writes:

<< it goes out in the mail tomorrow to todd so send him your mailing address. 
>>

Thanks!  I will scan for the group in Todd can't scan.

Todd - please e-mail me privately.

Ivan

ivancu@...