MOTM

All,

I'm just starting to build my first 300.  Holy smoke, lots-o-parts!  
Now, I'm not picky, I just want a few things:

I want to build it properly,  :|
I want it to work properly,
I want it to perform consistency with future 300s,
and I want more of them - oh, you already knew that.

I see that, as in many other modules, there are different levels of 
precision components used throughout, and that the higher precision 
components are used at *critical* points in the circuit.  I realize 
Paul knows exactly what quality components need to go where, no 
question.  I also understand that there is a necessary compromise 
point between quality and affordability.  (The difference between DIY 
and a business, er... hobby.)

One good example of this is my latest oblivious trek: debugging a 
problem with the 410.  Turns out I have a bad Vactrol - bummer. :(  
During this lesson, I also learned that resistors R53, R56 and R59 
are used to set the idle current, and directly affect the freq1/2/3 
pot settings for center frequency (Fc) accordingly.  (These are 5% 
parts.)  The 3 pots should *theoretically* operate the same, I 
believe.  For my 410, however, the freq 2 and 3 settings for a given 
Fc are not the same.  Actually, it's not a big difference, only about 
.5 on the scale.  Just me bein anal. ;-)  A resistor tolerance issue?

In any case, I bet there will be other instances of parts just at the 
fringe of their tolerance ratings that may have minor unwanted side-
effects and/or that affect the consistency across same-model 
modules.  (This would of course affect patch reproducability.)  And 
then there's that whole drift thing.

So, this makes me wonder, would there be any advantage in using 
higher precision components across the board?  Wouldn't the use of 1% 
metal film resistors and higher precision caps lead to more accurate 
module performance and/or consistency?  Hey!  I AM NOT questioning 
the performance/quality/consistency of MOTM modules, just wondering 
if a no-holds-barred approach in parts quality would actually make a 
difference.

George -just bein anal- Kisslak

--- In motm@y..., "GeorgeK" <george.kisslak@h...> wrote:
> So, this makes me wonder, would there be any advantage in using 
> higher precision components across the board?  Wouldn't the use of 
> 1% metal film resistors and higher precision caps lead to more 
> accurate module performance and/or consistency?  

You ask two questions, and they MAY have different answers. Yes, 
higher precision parts lead to more accurate performance, but the 
advantage gained may be small enough not to be worth it, audiowise or 
otherwise...

Moe